--- title: What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation description: From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/ author: Israel Melendez Ayala article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-05-06T15:18:49.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-06T15:37:38.466Z article:section: Ideas og:title: What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation og:description: From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt267ba068df976fa4/69fb5b403cc3f077a7deb6a6/trump-ballroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: trump-ballroom.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation twitter:description: From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt267ba068df976fa4/69fb5b403cc3f077a7deb6a6/trump-ballroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7ff87247-8b56-44ae-8298-c12b26365b88&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7ff87247-8b56-44ae-8298-c12b26365b88&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=7ff87247-8b56-44ae-8298-c12b26365b88&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: Trump Says the White House Ballroom Is Essential For Security. Is It? [Watch (HLS stream): Trump Says the White House Ballroom Is Essential For Security. Is It?](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/g91ICZxa.m3u8) (1:19)  _Published 2026-04-29. From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala._ by [Israel Melendez Ayala](https://time.com/author/israel-melendez-ayala/) ## Israel Melendez Ayala Israel Meléndez Ayala is a historian and writer. He publishes a biweekly newsletter, Crítica. May 6, 2026 3:18 PM UTC by [Israel Melendez Ayala](https://time.com/author/israel-melendez-ayala/) ## Israel Melendez Ayala Israel Meléndez Ayala is a historian and writer. He publishes a biweekly newsletter, Crítica. May 6, 2026 3:18 PM UTC Historic preservation is often dismissed as nostalgia, the hobby of people who prefer old facades to modern needs. But preservation is not a refusal of change—[it is a discipline](https://www.nps.gov/subjects/historicpreservation/what-is-historic-preservation.htm), a way of deciding which changes deepen the meaning of a place and which ones degrade it. In Washington, that discipline matters because the capital’s buildings do not merely house power. They teach Americans how democratic power is meant to be expressed in architectural language. The National Park Service describes the White House as “a symbol of the presidency, of a free democratic society, and through its continuity, of the [stability of our nation](https://www.nps.gov/whho/planyourvisit/upload/WHHO%5FFD%5F2015-508-accessible-resize.pdf).” President Donald Trump’s actions do not match this vision of stewardship. His [ballroom project](https://time.com/article/2026/04/17/white-house-military-complex-bunker-trump-ballroom/) and proposed [triumphal arch](https://time.com/article/2026/04/11/how-trump-s-proposed-triumphal-arch-stacks-up-against-others-around-the-world/) seem to indicate an ambition to turn the architecture of the nation into a monument to presidential taste. That instinct is visible in the way the Trump Administration has handled the East Wing itself. [Demolition began](https://time.com/7327200/trump-white-house-ballroom-east-wing-demolition/) in Oct. 2025, before Congress had authorized the ballroom. Later reporting showed that the project was not merely a ballroom above ground but also a below-grade security complex, including a bunker beneath the site. Now, Senate Republicans are pushing an immigration-enforcement funding [bill](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/us/politics/republicans-immigration-bill-trump-ballroom.html) through Congress that would allocate [$1 billion](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/republicans-propose-1-billion-taxpayer-dollars-secure-trump-ballroom-rcna343637) of taxpayer dollars to fund his ballroom renovation. Even though the White House and its grounds are exempt from the National Historic Preservation Act under [54 U.S.C. § 307104](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/54/307104), that [does not make](https://www.ncpc.gov/docs/actions/2026March/8733%5FEast%5FWing%5FModernization%5FProject%5FStaff%5FReport%5FMar2026.pdf) the East Wing’s destruction preservation-neutral. Preservation is also a norm of stewardship. Once historic fabric is demolished, the loss is irreversible. Once a president can tear down first and justify later, public review becomes theater rather than protection. And the [White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/the-white-house/) is not just another old building. George Washington [selected the site in 1791](https://www.whitehousehistory.org/galleries/building-the-presidents-house). John Adams moved in in [1800](https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/november-1/john-adams-moves-into-white-house). The building has been burned, rebuilt, enlarged, and adapted, but those changes became part of a larger national narrative. The White House is valuable because it embodies continuity. That is why the recent fight over columns was so poignant, even if no redesign was formally adopted. In March, the chair of Trump’s [Commission of Fine Arts](https://www.cfa.gov/about-cfa/history) floated replacing the White House’s Ionic columns with the more ornate [Corinthian order that Trump prefers](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/15/white-house-columns-ionic-corinthian/). That is not decorative trivia. In architectural language, Ionic columns convey proportion, dignity, and restraint. Corinthian columns, with their acanthus leaves and richer ornament, signal display, monumentality, and theatrical grandeur. The scholar Steven Semes called the proposed switch “[inappropriate for the Executive Residence](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/15/white-house-columns-ionic-corinthian/?utm),” and he was right. Architecture has syntax. To understand why that matters, one has to understand Washington itself. [Pierre L’Enfant’s 1791 plan](https://www.nps.gov/articles/dc-monumental-core-the-lenfant-plan.htm) and the later [McMillan vision](https://www.whitehousehistory.org/photos/fotoware?id=F0F739CE933B4264%20A492AA62F25F33B2) gave the capital a grammar of avenues, framed vistas, measured monumentality and careful relationships between buildings and open space. Congress created the [Commission of Fine Arts](https://www.cfa.gov/about-cfa/history) in 1910 to protect that language. Washington was never meant to be an anthology of presidential whims. It was designed as a civic composition, one in which restraint was part of the message. The ballroom makes Trump’s misunderstanding impossible to miss. In [July 2025](https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/07/the-white-house-announces-white-house-ballroom-construction-to-begin/?utm), the White House announced an approximately 90,000-square-foot ballroom that would cost about $200 million and be funded by Trump donors. Since then, the price tag attached to the project has [ballooned](https://apnews.com/article/trump-white-house-ballroom-lawsuit-b2b3121ef594cf3006c24ddd306e50aa). A federal judge [ruled on March 31](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.60.0%5F3.pdf) that the project could go forward only with congressional approval, and Judge Richard Leon [later clarified](https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/9caa9b56-bbc9-49a8-867a-02144cf3a3aa.pdf?itid=lk%5Finline%5Fmanual%5F4) that only limited underground work tied to security could continue. Then came the [shooting at the White House correspondents’ dinner](https://time.com/article/2026/04/25/trump-rushed-off-stage-after-shots-fired-at-white-house-correspondents-dinner/), held at the Washington Hilton, after which Trump and his allies rushed to say the attack proved the [ballroom’s necessity](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/28/trump-ballroom-filing-national-trust-lawsuit/). The Justice Department’s [April 27](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.79.0.pdf) motion went even further, insisting the injunction should be dissolved because such an attack “could have never taken place” in the new facility and accusing the [National Trust for Historic Preservation](https://savingplaces.org/) of suffering from “[Trump Derangement Syndrome](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/28/trump-ballroom-filing-national-trust-lawsuit/).” The filing matters not only for its tone, but for what it reveals. The National Trust has [repeatedly said](https://apnews.com/article/white-house-ballroom-donald-trump-lawsuit-bcbe5b42723fcae1870d55b5921404b5) its lawsuit is about whether a president can demolish and rebuild parts of the White House without congressional authorization, not about blocking legitimate security measures, and it has [not opposed](https://cdn.savingplaces.org/2026/03/12/15/13/26/38688c2e-58b4-4b4c-8071-02302616a9a1/ECF%2051-1.pdf) underground protective construction. The real issue is [power](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/27/trump-ballroom-national-trust-lawsuit/). Meanwhile, the institutional guardrails have been weakened. James McCrery, the project’s first architect, [was replaced](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/04/trump-ballroom-architect) after [clashing with Trump over the ballroom’s size](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/04/us/politics/trump-ballroom-white-house-construction.html), and once the East Wing was already rubble, [Trump fired all six sitting members](https://www.npr.org/2025/10/30/nx-s1-5590040/white-house-fires-commission-that-reviews-designs-for-federal-buildings) of the Commission of Fine Arts. The National Capital Planning Commission is now chaired by [Will Scharf](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/02/trump-ballroom-federal-review-commission/), Trump’s former lawyer, who worked on his legal team. The appeals court has given Trump partial breathing room. [Aboveground work](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-ballroom-construction-allowed-now-us-appeals-court-says-2026-04-18/?utm) has been allowed to continue temporarily while the case moves toward a June hearing. Meanwhile, [Republican](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-republicans-push-legislation-build-fund-trumps-400-million-ballroom-2026-04-27/?utm) lawmakers are [pushing legislation to fund and speed](https://apnews.com/article/white-house-ballroom-trump-congress-9b8a11f9ba87a2583e2d7b9684861d9a) the ballroom, with some now [proposing taxpayer money](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-split-using-taxpayer-funds-trump-white-house-ballroom-rcna342290) for a project Trump once said would be privately donated. What began as a supposed gift is being converted into a public bill. Then there is the [triumphal arch](https://www.reuters.com/world/designs-unveiled-trumps-proposed-250-foot-arch-washington-2026-04-10/), which may be the purest expression of Trump’s architectural politics. He has said he wants the largest triumphal arch in the world. The current design would rise [250 feet at Memorial Circle on Columbia Island](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/16/fine-arts-commission-trump-arch-approval/), on National Park Service land [near Arlington National Cemetery](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/01/31/trump-arch-memorial-circle/). The structure would be taller than the Arc de Triomphe and the Lincoln Memorial, topped by a [60-foot winged figure](https://apnews.com/article/trump-arch-9ac0b34c18a8801d44a9ef2dbb23132b) and embellished with gilded eagles, lions, and patriotic inscriptions. This is not classical restraint. It is self-dramatization in limestone and gold. Unlike the White House, Memorial Circle does not fall inside the same statutory exemption. That means the preservation question is not [merely moral but legal](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A54+section%3A306108+edition%3Aprelim%29&utm). [Section 106](https://www.achp.gov/digital-library-section-106-landing/section-106-review-fact-sheet?utm) was written precisely to require federal agencies to consider what their undertakings would do to historic properties and commemorative landscapes. And [Memorial Circle](https://www.nps.gov/articles/600247.htm?utm) is no empty traffic island. It is part of the solemn corridor between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. The Commission of Fine Arts gave the arch [early design approval](https://www.cfa.gov/records-research/project-search/cfa-16-apr-26-1) this month even after [receiving about 1,000 public comments](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/triumphal-arch-design-clears-hurdle-commission-fine-arts-rcna332233) that were, by its own secretary’s account, “100 percent” opposed. What Trump keeps misunderstanding is that preservation is about preserving meaning. The White House is supposed to symbolize continuity, democratic stability, and the peaceful transfer of power. A capital city should preserve and project dignity, continuity and civic restraint. It should not be reshaped into an architectural expression of one man’s fantasy. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ## Transcript President Trump says the Correspondents Dinner incident proves that a white House ballroom is essential to his security. Does he have a point? Here's what I saw at the hotel ballroom when the incident happened, and what I learned after talking to security experts in 60s when shots were fired at the Washington Hilton Hotel on Saturday night, there were thousands of people sitting in the ballroom, two levels below the ground floor, along with many other guests staying in their rooms upstairs. There were multiple layers of security measures in place. Everyone needed to show their tickets and walk past. Magnetometers set up at the entrance of the ballroom, and K-9 units were seen patrolling at every level of the building. Former Secret Service agents told me that hosting the president at a hotel always presents challenges and the security situation. Clearing the entire hotel for this one event is not practical from a financial or legal perspective. The fact that the suspect was stopped before reaching the ballroom shows that the security protocol worked as intended, while experts says hosting an event at the white House ballroom could ensure maximum security in practice, no president can only attend events at the white House. Trump himself loves to host rallies around the country, and every president needs to step outside the white House perimeter to be with the people, which will always come with security risks. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/"},"headline":"What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation","datePublished":"2026-05-06T15:18:49.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-06T15:37:38.466Z","description":"From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/","keywords":["Culture","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt267ba068df976fa4/69fb5b403cc3f077a7deb6a6/trump-ballroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Israel Melendez Ayala","jobTitle":"Israel Meléndez Ayala is a historian and writer. He publishes a biweekly newsletter, Crítica.","url":"https://time.com/author/israel-melendez-ayala/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt267ba068df976fa4/69fb5b403cc3f077a7deb6a6/trump-ballroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"trump-ballroom.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/culture/","name":"Culture"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/","name":"What Trump Gets Wrong About Preservation"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Trump Says the White House Ballroom Is Essential For Security. Is It?","description":"From the White House ballroom to the proposed triumphal arch, Trump’s vision for the capital confuses stewardship with ownership, writes Israel Meléndez Ayala.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/g91ICZxa/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2026-04-29T19:08:46.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/g91ICZxa.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/","duration":"PT1M19S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/article/2026/05/06/what-trump-gets-wrong-about-preservation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```