--- title: Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him description: "State and local officials are holding the line against federal overreach," write Joanna Lydgate and Samantha Tarazi. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/ author: Joanna Lydgate article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-04-02T10:00:00.189Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-13T06:52:22.059Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him og:description: "State and local officials are holding the line against federal overreach," write Joanna Lydgate and Samantha Tarazi. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f14f15f5dea6a84/69cd8d1b63102900a073b9df/Trump-EO-0331.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Trump-EO-0331.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him twitter:description: "State and local officials are holding the line against federal overreach," write Joanna Lydgate and Samantha Tarazi. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f14f15f5dea6a84/69cd8d1b63102900a073b9df/Trump-EO-0331.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=dbc0bcde-8ddd-4b53-b218-90eb93111637&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=dbc0bcde-8ddd-4b53-b218-90eb93111637&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=dbc0bcde-8ddd-4b53-b218-90eb93111637&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=dbc0bcde-8ddd-4b53-b218-90eb93111637&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Joanna Lydgate](https://time.com/author/joanna-lydgate/) and [Samantha Tarazi](https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/) Samantha Tarazi is CEO and co-founder of Voting Rights Lab Apr 2, 2026 10:00 AM UTC  President Donald Trump after signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2026. President Donald Trump after signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2026. Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images by [Joanna Lydgate](https://time.com/author/joanna-lydgate/) and [Samantha Tarazi](https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/) Samantha Tarazi is CEO and co-founder of Voting Rights Lab Apr 2, 2026 10:00 AM UTC When President Donald Trump declared that Republicans should “[nationalize](https://time.com/7366147/trump-nationalize-voting-federalize-elections-fraud-republicans/)” or “take over” the 2026 midterm elections, it wasn’t just a flippant remark. It was an unconstitutional red flag and part of a decade-long pattern in which Trump has undermined confidence in American elections. Tuesday's [executive order targeting mail voting](https://time.com/article/2026/04/01/trump-executive-order-mail-in-voting-states-rebuke-legal-challenge/) was just the latest example. The order aims to dictate how local officials run elections in their own communities and would fundamentally alter the voting process nationwide, potentially disenfranchising millions of voters. It directs the Department of Homeland Security to create a purported "State Citizenship List." It also bars the U.S. Postal Service from delivering ballots to any voters not on a federal list, and even encourages the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute local election officials who break from the White House. Each and every part of the order attempts to seize power from the states and hand it over to a single man. That's not how American elections work—not now, not ever. Let’s be clear: states run elections. Period. Our system of voting is intentionally decentralized, a cornerstone of America's tradition of checks and balances. This ensures elections and are run by state and local officials who know what works best for their communities. The president has no constitutional authority over state-run elections, yet President Trump has not hesitated to test the bounds of his authority. With 2026 primaries already underway and the president pushing his legislative power grab—the [SAVE America Act](https://time.com/article/2026/03/10/trump-save-america-act-republicans-congress-voter-ID-senate-john-thune/)—alongside a sweeping executive order to nationalize our elections, the threat to free, fair, and secure elections in this country is playing out in real time. Since Trump returned to office, his administration has tried to [militarize our communities](https://time.com/7346697/insurrection-act-trump-ice-protests-history-analysis/), [intimidate political enemies](https://time.com/7335430/trump-democrats-arrest-sedition-military-illegal-orders-video/), and [punish peaceful protestors](https://time.com/7291978/los-angeles-immigration-protests-trump-national-guard-deployed-newsom-backlash/) and the [free press](https://time.com/7338411/white-house-media-bias-tracker-trump-attacks/). The brutal actions we’ve seen from federal agents in Minnesota and around the country [scared Americans](https://time.com/7345628/anti-ice-minneapolis-minnesota-protests-fear/) and sought to [consolidate federal powers](https://time.com/7362221/minnesota-threat-of-american-authoritarianism/). However, such actions are also a sign of weakness from a president becoming increasingly desperate in his tactics. [Trump](https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/53955-donald-trump-support-from-independents-hits-new-low-january-23-26-2026-economist-yougov-poll) and his [policies](https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Trump%5FIssue%5FHandling%5Fpoll%5Fresults%5F84DsE0W.pdf) are [deeply](https://time.com/7305351/trump-polling-new-low/) [unpopular](https://time.com/7382231/iran-us-israel-war-support-polling-trump-republicans-democrats/). Against this backdrop, Trump is becoming more brazen in his attempts to assert executive power over the states. He has been lying about [elections](https://time.com/5887438/trump-mail-in-voting/) since his first campaign in 2016, and it isn’t hard to imagine why. By undermining trust in our elections, Trump makes it easier to cast doubt on results he doesn’t like. Last year, the White House tried to overhaul our election system through another unconstitutional [executive order](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/preserving-and-protecting-the-integrity-of-american-elections/). Several states sued to stop it, and the courts agreed with them. Trump can’t legally change the voting process all by himself. At the same time, Trump’s Justice Department has been seeking access to individual voter data—first through letters, then through a flurry of [lawsuits](https://www.npr.org/2025/12/12/nx-s1-5642610/doj-voter-data-lawsuits-colorado-hawaii-massachusetts-nevada). These efforts are not normal; there is no precedent for such sweeping actions under previous Republican or Democratic presidents. Trump’s Department of Justice has demanded that election officials violate [state](https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-16-elections-and-electors/az-rev-st-sect-16-168/) [laws](https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/6/ii/46/2) and hand over private and sensitive data for no clear reason. To date, the court rulings in these cases have sided with the states, unequivocally affirming their authority to conduct elections. When Attorney General Pam Bondi sent Minnesota Governor Tim Walz a [letter](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/01/24/us/pam-bondi-walz-doc.html) demanding voter data just hours after federal agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, she attempted to leverage ICE operations as a coercive weapon. The FBI seizure of Fulton County’s 2020 ballots and the subpoena for Maricopa County's election records (based on [discredited](https://www.npr.org/2026/02/10/nx-s1-5710649/fulton-county-2020-election-affidavit-fbi) conspiracy theories) was another escalation. By continuing a false narrative about the 2020 election, Trump may destabilize the 2026 election. Here’s the good news: State and local officials are holding the line against federal overreach. From Democrat Joceyln Benson in [Michigan](https://bridgemi.com/michigan-government/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-admin-lawsuit-over-michigan-voter-rolls/) to Republican Brad Raffensperger in [Georgia](https://georgiarecorder.com/2026/01/23/raffensperger-rebuffs-pressure-campaign-to-hand-over-sensitive-voter-data-to-feds/), secretaries of state from both parties have refused to comply with Trump's demands. State legislatures, even in deep-red states, have refused to carry out Trump’s agenda: [Indiana](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/indiana-republicans-block-new-congressional-map-in-rare-break-with-trump) blocked mid-decade redistricting, for example, and [Texas](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/06/03/texas-vote-citizen-proof/) failed to pass a restrictive proof-of-citizenship voter mandate. [Idaho](https://www.propublica.org/article/idaho-voter-data-trump-justice-department) recently denied the DOJ access to their voter rolls, reaffirming states’ authority to govern their own elections. Meanwhile, our federal and state courts are consistently standing up for the Constitution and the rule of law. Our system of checks and balances is working. Americans aren’t buying what Trump is selling. They want to move on from Trump’s 2020 loss and election denial. They [don’t want](https://statesunited.org/resources/election-interference-survey/) the Trump administration to be more involved in our elections. They [trust local election officials](https://statesunited.org/resources/local-election-official-trust/) to run elections well and want [every vote counted](https://statesunited.org/resources/over-time-survey/#section-4) more than they want their preferred candidate to win. Americans can and should go to the polls with confidence. When people [trust elections](https://statesunited.org/resources/when-americans-trust-elections/), they are more likely to vote. As the midterms approach, voters should look to state and county election officials for trustworthy, accurate information on how they are keeping elections safe and secure. These officials work year-round in our communities to prepare for elections, from routine maintenance to training election workers and testing voting machines. They will be prepared to defend our elections against federal interference and uphold the right of every eligible voter to have their voice heard. The Trump administration is trying to “take over” elections, but that doesn’t mean they will succeed. It's up to the states to ensure they don’t. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/"},"headline":"Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him","datePublished":"2026-04-02T10:00:00.189Z","dateModified":"2026-05-13T06:52:22.059Z","description":"\"State and local officials are holding the line against federal overreach,\" write Joanna Lydgate and Samantha Tarazi.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f14f15f5dea6a84/69cd8d1b63102900a073b9df/Trump-EO-0331.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Joanna Lydgate","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/joanna-lydgate/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Samantha Tarazi","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f14f15f5dea6a84/69cd8d1b63102900a073b9df/Trump-EO-0331.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Trump-EO-0331.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/04/02/trump-is-trying-to-nationalize-elections-states-won-t-let-him/","name":"Trump Is Trying to Nationalize Elections. States Won’t Let Him"}}]}] ```