--- title: 'Incoherent' Iran Briefings Prompt Democratic Revolt description: Democrats left closed-door, classified briefings horrified at the Trump Administration's real Iran strategy. “It is so much worse than you thought,” Elizabeth Warren said. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-03-11T21:25:23.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-19T07:44:54.116Z article:section: Politics og:title: ‘It Is So Much Worse Than You Thought’: Iran Briefings Leave Democrats Furious og:description: Democrats exited closed-door, classified briefings uniformly aghast at what they heard about the Administration's strategy. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta9bb6716cbf19ec7/69b1c6342c8ca92c9f14db7b/GettyImages-2265791304.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: GettyImages-2265791304.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: ‘It Is So Much Worse Than You Thought’: Iran Briefings Leave Democrats Furious twitter:description: Democrats exited closed-door, classified briefings uniformly aghast at what they heard about the Administration's strategy. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta9bb6716cbf19ec7/69b1c6342c8ca92c9f14db7b/GettyImages-2265791304.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # ‘It Is So Much Worse Than You Thought’: Classified Iran Briefings Leave Democrats Furious > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=194c33be-2201-4c16-ab37-590f9c83b6d3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=194c33be-2201-4c16-ab37-590f9c83b6d3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=194c33be-2201-4c16-ab37-590f9c83b6d3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ## Video: Senators weigh U.S. role in Iran war as conflict continues [Watch (HLS stream): Senators weigh U.S. role in Iran war as conflict continues](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/n19eHZxe.m3u8) (1:59)  _Published 2026-03-10. Iran’s attacks on regional oil infrastructure and threats to choke off maritime traffic left markets on edge Tuesday as the United States promised blistering new strikes. Both sides sharpened their rhetoric as they dug in. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth again promised the most intense strikes yet, while Iran’s leaders ruled out talks and directly threatened President Donald Trump._  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Mar 11, 2026 9:25 PM UTC  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Mar 11, 2026 9:25 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [here](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ There’s always a tinge of performative outrage on Capitol Hill, a tendency to indulge hyperbole and summon more than a little manufactured disbelief. But the mood right now among Democrats is a class apart, so much that it could bring Congress to a standstill. As the joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran slogs into its second week, Democrats have exited closed-door, classified briefings uniformly aghast at what they were told. That sincere fury has prompted a group of Senators to threaten to shut down the chamber’s floor unless Senate Majority Leader John Thune allows hearings on an expensive and unpopular operation that has roiled the Middle East, [sent oil prices rocketing](https://time.com/article/2026/03/10/ioil-prices-iran-republicans-lose-house-hakeem-jeffries/), and left hundreds dead. "I don't know how we put this genie back in the bottle," Sen. Chris Murphy said. "I don't know how we don't become a nation in which one person, one man, one woman, decides whether the entire country goes to war." Murphy was among the lawmakers to receive a highly sensitive two-hour briefing on Tuesday. Taking pains not to disclose classified information, the Connecticut Democrat [suggested](https://bsky.app/profile/chrismurphyct.bsky.social/post/3mgqotmihcs2w) the war plans were “incoherent and incomplete.” Neither regime change nor the eradication of Iran’s nuclear capacity are explicit goals of the war, according to those doing the briefing, contradicting statements made by President Donald Trump. There is also, according to Murphy, no long-term plan for moving commercial traffic again through the Strait of Hormuz, the shipping route that carries about one-fifth of the world’s oil. “It is so much worse than you thought,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said. “The Trump administration has no plan in Iran. This illegal war is based on lies and it was launched without any imminent threat to our nation. Trump has not given a single clear reason for the war and has no plan to end it.” Added Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland: “What you hear behind closed doors is essentially what we’re hearing in the public domain, which is complete incoherence.” Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut [said](https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5777350-potential-us-troops-iran-ground/) after his briefing—which he described as leaving him “as dissatisfied and angry, frankly, as I have from any past briefing in my 15 years in the Senate”—that he senses boots on the ground will be the next step without an intervention from Congress. All the while, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey is doing a nose count to see who is with him on plans to jam up all Senate business. "We are not going to let business as usual go on in the Senate," he said. "It is time for the Senate to do its job, and we are demanding that the Republican leadership of the Senate hold the adequate hearings and oversight, as well as to allow a debate that brings transparency to this onto the Senate floor." Sen. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin said too much is at stake to leave Trump on auto-pilot: "We intend to use every lever that we can in order to get those hearings." Not dissimilar to their ongoing [shutdown fight over immigration enforcement](https://time.com/7358680/government-shutdown-democrats-takeaways-analysis/), Democrats see the public on their side on this. Trump has bounced between any number of reasons to justify his strikes on Iran, while providing odd, at times contradictory, assessments on how close theUnited States is in achieving its goals in the military conflict. Trump has said in recent days that the mission in Iran is almostcomplete, but also that he won’t stop until he has Iran’s complete surrender, and that sending U.S. troops remains a possibility. He has said Iran must get a new leader whom Trump has blessed as acceptable, even as the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was replaced by [his son, another hardliner](https://time.com/7383138/mojtaba-khamenei-supreme-leader-iran/). Trump has crowed about disarming Iran’s proxies in the region, grounding its Air Force, and sinking its Navy. “We’re up to boat number 60\. I didn’t realize they had that big a Navy,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday. If that sounds confusing, it’s because it is. This is not like Japan attacking Pearl Harbor or Afghanistan providing safe haven for the 9/11 plotters. This feels a lot more like the pre-emptive rhetoric that led the invasion of Iraq based on a belief it would make Americans safer. Most Democrats in Congress at that time ultimately backed that effort. Those there now seem more ready to stand against this military action. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, said "the story from the administration changes by the hour." "When it comes to sending our service members into harm's way, the American people need to understand why. But right now, they don't even have a 'why,'" Schumer said. Meanwhile, even some corners of Trump’s base are going wobbly. Podcasting captain of the Manosphere Joe Rogan [said](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/rogan-trump-iran-war.html) on his show Tuesday that the new conflict was a “betrayal” of Trump’s campaign pledges. “He ran on no more wars: End these stupid, senseless wars. And then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it,” Rogan said. Despite private grumblings among Republicans about Trump’s scattershot justifications, party strategists take comfort in the fact that the base is with Trump on this military campaign so far. Among Republicans, 84% support U.S. military involvement in the region and 79% support Trump’s approach to Iran, according to NPR [polling](https://maristpoll.marist.edu/polls/war-with-iran-march-2026/). (Democrats point out that NPR’s polling on Trump in Iran from 2020 found 88% of Republicans supported Trump’s approach, suggesting a weakening appetite for war now.) Yet this still remains a wildly unpopular war. Democrats are not only reading their base accurately—86% of Democrats oppose the military strikes and his approach to Iran—but a majority of independents as well. The way the party’s pushback may play out at the Capitol for now is through Senators gumming up the Senate floor. Trump has repeatedly called on the Senate to abolish rules that allow a minority to block action but Republicans in the Senate seem to have temporary hearing loss on those calls. Thune understands well that Republicans will want to use that same minority power down the line, perhaps sooner than he expected if the war against Iran drags down its early endorsers. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ## Transcript I want to know who is picking targets in Iran, who may be responsible for killing 175 school children with a Tomahawk missile. The administration has failed to answer questions about the attack on that school, which seemingly resulted from a United States Tomahawk missile. But most importantly, the list of targets. What the end game is here, the timeline and what the costs are going to be, not only in immediate terms, but longer term for our economy. The rising cost of gasoline is just one sign of impending economic chaos. At this point, I am a hard no on a supplemental. This is not a war the American people want us to engage in. Um, this is not a war supported by this country. And this is not a war that makes us safer. for the Trump administration to say over and over, there's no money for health care, there's no money for childcare, there's no time to pay attention to how families are paying more. But there's $1 billion a day to go to the Middle East and drop bombs on Iran for military purposes that no one can describe. And that no one can explain how, merely from dropping bombs from the air, we will accomplish those ends. No. No more money. The one thing Congress has the power to do is to stop actions like this through the power of the purse. The military is looking at it. We'll see what we need to do to help our military and maybe our friends in the Gulf and Israel. But yeah, we need to be all in and finish the job. I've never been more impressed with the military operation than I am. Epic, period. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/"},"headline":"‘It Is So Much Worse Than You Thought’: Classified Iran Briefings Leave Democrats Furious","datePublished":"2026-03-11T21:25:23.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-19T07:44:54.116Z","description":"A group of Senators are threatening to shut down the Senate floor over Iran","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","Congress","democrats"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta9bb6716cbf19ec7/69b1c6342c8ca92c9f14db7b/GettyImages-2265791304.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta9bb6716cbf19ec7/69b1c6342c8ca92c9f14db7b/GettyImages-2265791304.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"GettyImages-2265791304.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Anna Moneymaker—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/","name":"‘It Is So Much Worse Than You Thought’: Classified Iran Briefings Leave Democrats Furious"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Senators weigh U.S. role in Iran war as conflict continues","description":"Iran’s attacks on regional oil infrastructure and threats to choke off maritime traffic left markets on edge Tuesday as the United States promised blistering new strikes. Both sides sharpened their rhetoric as they dug in. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth again promised the most intense strikes yet, while Iran’s leaders ruled out talks and directly threatened President Donald Trump.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/n19eHZxe/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2026-03-10T18:23:20.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/n19eHZxe.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/","duration":"PT1M59S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/article/2026/03/11/-it-is-so-much-worse-than-you-thought-classified-iran-briefings-leave-democrats-furious/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```