--- title: Questioning the Grand ‘Huntsman 2016’ Conjecture description: A very popular theory on Jon Huntsman's, um, unique march toward the center is that it's all part of a well-thought out scheme to win... canonical: https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/ author: TIME Staff article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2011-08-22T18:58:04.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-18T08:25:24.597Z article:section: Politics og:title: Questioning the Grand ‘Huntsman 2016’ Conjecture og:description: A very popular theory on Jon Huntsman's, um, unique march toward the center is that it's all part of a well-thought out scheme to win... og:url: https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Questioning the Grand ‘Huntsman 2016’ Conjecture twitter:description: A very popular theory on Jon Huntsman's, um, unique march toward the center is that it's all part of a well-thought out scheme to win... twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- * [Politics](/section/politics/) # Questioning the Grand 'Huntsman 2016' Conjecture > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=a4f69268-aa2c-4569-97a9-9d98d1417373&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=a4f69268-aa2c-4569-97a9-9d98d1417373&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=a4f69268-aa2c-4569-97a9-9d98d1417373&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [TIME Staff](https://time.com/author/time-staff/) Aug 22, 2011 6:58 PM UTC by [TIME Staff](https://time.com/author/time-staff/) Aug 22, 2011 6:58 PM UTC A very [popular](http://www.frumforum.com/huntsman-2016) [theory](http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/morning-examiner-huntsman%E2%80%99s-2016-strategy) on Jon Huntsman’s, um, unique [march toward the center](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/21/jon-huntsman-2012-candidates-this-week%5Fn%5F932399.html) is that it’s all part of a well-thought out scheme to win the presidential nomination next time around. The scenario laid out by various pundits is basically this: Next year, the GOP nominates a conservative a la Perry or Bachmann, who then loses to Obama. After a few demoralizing years of congressional losses, Republicans begin looking for a moderate messiah to lead them out of the wilderness in 2016 and Huntsman, having built his credentials in 2012, becomes the natural choice. Never mind that the congressional picture looks pretty good for the GOP in 2012 and that predicting dominant political trends for Nov 8, 2016, is about as useful as forecasting that day’s weather. There’s a much simpler explanation for Huntsman’s conservative-scolding:moreHe needs some way, any way, to stand out. Huntsman’s biggest problem is that there are basically two CliffsNotes versions of his candidacy: He’s either “the guy who worked for Obama for two years” Or “the Mormon technocratic former governor. No. A different one.” The former is obviously no way to run for the Republican nomination and the latter is taken. Mitt Romney was there first, has arguably had an easier time papering over his various apostasies, and has been winning the electability argument from the beginning. Huntsman can’t really try to bank sharp right or win on social issues. Romney tried that and failed in ’07/’08\. and anyway, the Bachmanns and Perrys of the race aren’t going to be beat on their own turf. So with near zero traction in the polls and hopes of challenging Romney in more temperate contests such as New Hampshire’s, Huntsman’s been skirting left by sheer necessity, looking for any way to distinguish himself from the rest of the field. His pointedly non-interventionist stance on Afghanistan and Libya, and “pro-science” spiel on evolution and climate are good examples. That being said, why can’t all this be part of some well thought out long-game to win in 2016? Well, for starters, it doesn’t appear to be so well thought out. Huntsman has completely reversed (as all presidential candidates eventually do) his original pledge to run a kinder, gentler campaign. “There’s a simple reason our party is nowhere near being a national governing party,” Huntsman-whisperer John Weaver [told _Esquire_](http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/jon-huntsman-afghanistan-5924855#ixzz1VQwgj200) back in June. “No one wants to be around a bunch of cranks.” And never mind [what Huntsman was telling TIME](http://swampland.time.com/2011/05/16/qa-jon-huntsman-on-the-presidents-hes-worked-with-and-his-own-prospects-of-joining-their-ranks/) in May. He’s now out there making Obama teleprompter cracks and [giving the DNC ample fodder](http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61792.html) to knock the “zero substance” GOP field. There’s also some inconsistency to his supposed strategy. If his centrist tack was a premeditated plot to eschew 2012 for 2016, wouldn’t he have [raised his hand](http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2011/08/huntsman-shows-his-hand.html) at the Iowa debate when the candidates were asked if any of them would accept a deficit reduction deal that achieved $10 in spending cuts for $1 in tax increases. What’s more likely: that Huntsman’s engaging in an elaborate five-year-long moderation political dance or that he overestimated his own appeal in the race and is now looking for some way to make an impression? ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/"},"headline":"Questioning the Grand 'Huntsman 2016' Conjecture","datePublished":"2011-08-22T18:58:04.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-18T08:25:24.597Z","description":"A very popular theory on Jon Huntsman's, um, unique march toward the center is that it's all part of a well-thought out scheme to win...","url":"https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/","keywords":["FCC"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"TIME Staff","url":"https://time.com/author/time-staff/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/archive/7187138/questioning-the-grand-huntsman-2016-conjecture/","name":"Questioning the Grand 'Huntsman 2016' Conjecture"}}]}] ```