<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/" -->

---
title: Annie Murphy Paul: The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'
description: How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice. In a groundbreaking paper published in 1993, cognitive psychologist Anders Ericsson added a crucial tweak to...
canonical: https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/
author: Annie Murphy Paul
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2012-01-25T10:00:34.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-03-16T09:36:12.669Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'
og:description: It's not how much you practice but whether you're quick to fix your errors that leads to mastery
og:url: https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=600&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
og:image:width: 600
og:image:height: 338
og:image:alt: learning to play the guitar
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'
twitter:description: It's not how much you practice but whether you're quick to fix your errors that leads to mastery
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=600&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=600&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)

* [Ideas](/section/ideas/)

# The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="7549d591-dac0-4af6-b3a5-8e0678070580" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7549d591-dac0-4af6-b3a5-8e0678070580&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7549d591-dac0-4af6-b3a5-8e0678070580&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=7549d591-dac0-4af6-b3a5-8e0678070580&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7549d591-dac0-4af6-b3a5-8e0678070580&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Annie Murphy Paul](https://time.com/author/annie-murphy-paul/)

Jan 25, 2012 10:00 AM UTC

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Ryan McVay / Getty Images

by 

[Annie Murphy Paul](https://time.com/author/annie-murphy-paul/)

Jan 25, 2012 10:00 AM UTC

How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice. In a [groundbreaking paper](http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1993-40718-001) published in 1993, cognitive psychologist Anders Ericsson added a crucial tweak to that old joke. How do you get to Carnegie Hall? _Deliberate_ practice.

It’s not a minor change. The difference between ineffective and effective practice means the difference between mediocrity and mastery. If you’re not practicing deliberately — whether it’s a foreign language, a musical instrument or any other new skill — you might as well not practice at all.

(**MORE:** [Paul: How Your Dreams Can Make You Smarter](http://ideas.time.com/2012/01/04/how-your-dreams-can-make-you-smarter/))

I was reminded of the importance of deliberate practice by a fascinating new book, [_Guitar Zero: The New Musician and the Science of Learning_](http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Zero-Musician-Science-Learning/dp/1594203172/ref=sr%5F1%5F1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1327432852&sr=1-1). Its author is Gary Marcus, a cognitive psychologist at New York University who studies how the brain acquires language. Marcus is also a wannabe guitarist who set out on a quest to learn to play at age 38\. In _Guitar Zero_ he takes us along for the ride, exploring the relevant research from neuroscience, cognitive science and psychology along the way. One of his main themes is the importance of doing practice _right_.

“Hundreds of thousands of people took music lessons when they were young and remember little or nothing,” he points out, giving lie to the notion that learning an instrument is easiest when you’re a kid. The important thing is not just practice but deliberate practice, “a constant sense of self-evaluation, of focusing on one’s weaknesses, rather than simply fooling around and playing to one’s strengths. Studies show that practice aimed at remedying weaknesses is a better predictor of expertise than raw number of hours; playing for fun and repeating what you already know is not necessarily the same as efficiently reaching a new level. Most of the practice that most people do, most of the time, be it in the pursuit of learning the guitar or improving their golf game, yields almost no effect.”

So how does deliberate practice work? Anders Ericsson’s 1993 paper makes for bracing reading. He makes it clear that a dutiful daily commitment to practice is not enough. Long hours of practice are not enough. And noodling around on the piano or idly taking some swings with a golf club is _definitely_ not enough. “Deliberate practice,” Ericsson declares sternly, “requires effort and is not inherently enjoyable.” Having given us fair warning, he reveals the secret of deliberate practice: relentlessly focusing on our weaknesses and inventing new ways to root them out. Results are carefully monitored, ideally with the help of a coach or teacher, and become grist for the next round of ruthless self-evaluation.

(**MORE:** [Paul: The Power of Smart Listening](http://ideas.time.com/2011/12/07/the-power-of-smart-listening/))

It sounds simple, even obvious, but it’s something most of us avoid. If we play the piano — or, like Marcus, the guitar — or we play golf or speak French, it’s because we like it. We’ve often achieved a level of competency that makes us feel good about ourselves. But what we don’t do is intentionally look for ways that we’re failing and hammer away at those flaws until they’re gone, then search for more ways we’re messing up. But almost two decades of research shows that’s exactly what distinguishes the merely good from the great.

In an article titled [“It’s Not How Much; It’s How,”](http://jrm.sagepub.com/content/56/4/310.abstract) published in the _Journal of Research in Music Education_ in 2009, University of Texas-Austin professor Robert Duke and his colleagues videotaped advanced piano students as they practiced a difficult passage from a Shostakovich concerto, then ranked the participants by the quality of their ultimate performance. The researchers found no relationship between excellence of performance and how many times the students had practiced the piece or how long they spent practicing. Rather, “the most notable differences between the practice sessions of the top-ranked pianists and the remaining participants,” Duke and his coauthors wrote, “are related to their handling of errors.”

The best pianists, they determined, addressed their mistakes immediately. They identified the precise location and source of each error, then rehearsed that part again and again until it was corrected. Only then would the best students proceed to the rest of the piece. “It was not the case that the top-ranked pianists made fewer errors at the beginning of their practice sessions than did the other pianists,” Duke notes. “But, when errors occurred, the top-ranked pianists seemed much better able to correct them in ways that precluded their recurrence.”

Without deliberate practice, even the most talented individuals will reach a plateau and stay there. For most of us, that’s just fine. But don’t delude yourself that you’ll see much improvement unless you’re ready to tackle your mistakes as well as your successes.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/"},"headline":"The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'","datePublished":"2012-01-25T10:00:34.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-16T09:36:12.669Z","description":"How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice. In a groundbreaking paper published in 1993, cognitive psychologist Anders Ericsson added a crucial tweak to...","url":"https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/","keywords":[],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Annie Murphy Paul","url":"https://time.com/author/annie-murphy-paul/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt342dc78f72399485/698a91f8186892b6b76ce196/xxxx200543010-002.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"learning to play the guitar","caption":"","creditText":"Ryan McVay / Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133814/the-myth-of-practice-makes-perfect/","name":"The Myth of 'Practice Makes Perfect'"}}]}]
```

