--- title: Adam Cohen: Why Genetic Discrimination Is Illegal description: In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a new kind of discrimination claim: she charged that she had been fired... canonical: https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/ author: Adam Cohen article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2012-02-20T10:00:19.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-16T09:34:52.024Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Can You Be Fired for Your Genes? og:description: The number of complaints about genetic discrimination is on the rise og:url: https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc904abc32d8d1e7c/698a91e8c9e94124a7123731/pamela-fink.jpg?branch=production&width=600&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 600 og:image:height: 338 og:image:alt: pamela fink og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Can You Be Fired for Your Genes? twitter:description: The number of complaints about genetic discrimination is on the rise twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc904abc32d8d1e7c/698a91e8c9e94124a7123731/pamela-fink.jpg?branch=production&width=600&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  * [Ideas](/section/ideas/) # Can You Be Fired for Your Genes? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef14865c-24bf-4537-8cee-72396f109a48&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef14865c-24bf-4537-8cee-72396f109a48&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=ef14865c-24bf-4537-8cee-72396f109a48&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef14865c-24bf-4537-8cee-72396f109a48&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Adam Cohen](https://time.com/author/adam-cohen/) Feb 20, 2012 10:00 AM UTC  Pamela Fink at her home in Fairfield, Conn., on April 28, 2010\. Fink says she was fired after she tested positive for a breast-cancer gene and had a double mastectomy as a preventative measure Pamela Fink at her home in Fairfield, Conn., on April 28, 2010\. Fink says she was fired after she tested positive for a breast-cancer gene and had a double mastectomy as a preventative measure Douglas Healey / AP by [Adam Cohen](https://time.com/author/adam-cohen/) Feb 20, 2012 10:00 AM UTC In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a new kind of discrimination claim: she charged that she had been fired because she carries genes that predispose her to cancer. Fink quickly became the public face for the cutting edge of civil rights: genetic discrimination. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which was passed out of concern for just such cases in the wake of huge advances in genetics testing, took effect in late 2009\. GINA, as it is known, [makes it illegal](http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/gina.cfm) for employers to fire or refuse to hire workers based on their “genetic information” — including genetic tests and family history of disease. GINA doesn’t just apply to employers: health-insurance companies can be sued for using genetic information to set rates or even just for investigating people’s genes. (**MORE**: [Cohen: Should Paid Sick Days Be Required by Law?](http://ideas.time.com/2012/01/09/should-paid-sick-days-be-required-by-law/)) There have not been any landmark cases or huge jury awards yet under GINA, but genetic discrimination is real. According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s [annual report](http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/genetic.cfm), released last month, there were 245 genetic-discrimination complaints in fiscal year 2011, up more than 20% from a year earlier. At the same time, the EEOC reported that the “monetary benefits” it helped collect related to genetic discrimination — in damages, back pay and other penalties — jumped more than sixfold, from $80,000 to $500,000. These numbers will almost certainly increase greatly in coming years. Many people still do not know about their rights under GINA or even what genetic discrimination is. There will also no doubt be more lawyers developing genetic-discrimination practices. But the main reason these claims are likely to rise is that, as biological science advances, there is likely to be even more genetic information available about people. Tests are getting better at identifying those who are predisposed to cancer, heart disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Even though this sort of medical information should remain private, employers and insurance companies will have strong financial incentives to get access to it — and to use it to avoid people who are most likely to get sick. When genetic-discrimination claims start showing up in the courts in significant numbers, they are likely to get a sympathetic hearing. This is just the sort of civil right that there is the most support for. How much? When Congress enacted GINA in 2008, the House of Representatives supported it 414-1, and the Senate backed it unanimously. There are two major reasons that so many people — even congressional Republicans who are highly skeptical of civil rights laws — like GINA. First, there is the kind of discrimination it is aimed at: penalizing people for strands of DNA and RNA that they inherited from their parents through no fault of their own. Discrimination law is a tricky thing: there are no hard-and-fast rules for deciding what characteristics of a person should be off-limits in deciding whether to hire them, rent them an apartment or set their insurance rates. In general, our society has decided to protect people for qualities that are “immutable” — that is, something about them that is impossible or, at least, very difficult to change. So we make it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, skin color and sex. (And religion: in that case, people can easily change faiths — we just don’t think they have to.) On the other hand, we generally do not protect people who are not hired because they lack a high school diploma or because they wear a beard. Our response to those people is that if you want the job you should get more education or shave. Genes are a classic immutable characteristic: outside of some complicated medical procedures, we’re pretty much stuck with the genes we were born with. (**MORE**: [Cohen: Legal, Recreational Marijuana: Not So Far Out](http://ideas.time.com/2012/02/06/legal-recreational-marijuana-not-so-far-out/)) The second major reason genetic-discrimination laws are popular is that this is a kind of bias everyone feels they could be exposed to. If you are white, you may not think you will benefit from a law against racial discrimination, and if you are straight you probably do not worry about discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. But none of us has perfect genes — and for the most part, we have no idea what is lurking in our DNA and RNA. Our genes are complex enough that we all have some negative information encoded in there — and none of us wants to lose a job or be denied insurance over it. When juries begin to hear these cases, they are far more likely to identify with the plaintiffs than with the companies that discriminate. That doesn’t mean that there won’t be plenty of companies looking to benefit from genetic information, but if they use it, they may well have to pay. **MORE:** [Will Advances in Genetic Testing Reduce the Number of Babies with Down Syndrome?](http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2106979,00.html?iid=pw-op) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/"},"headline":"Can You Be Fired for Your Genes?","datePublished":"2012-02-20T10:00:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-16T09:34:52.024Z","description":"In 2010, Pamela Fink, an employee of a Connecticut energy company, made a new kind of discrimination claim: she charged that she had been fired...","url":"https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/","keywords":["DNA"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc904abc32d8d1e7c/698a91e8c9e94124a7123731/pamela-fink.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Adam Cohen","url":"https://time.com/author/adam-cohen/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc904abc32d8d1e7c/698a91e8c9e94124a7123731/pamela-fink.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"pamela fink","caption":"Pamela Fink at her home in Fairfield, Conn., on April 28, 2010. Fink says she was fired after she tested positive for a breast-cancer gene and had a double mastectomy as a preventative measure","creditText":"Douglas Healey / AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/archive/7133696/can-you-be-fired-for-your-genes/","name":"Can You Be Fired for Your Genes?"}}]}] ```