--- title: The Value of a Human Life: $129,000 description: In theory, a year of human life is priceless. In reality, it's worth $50,000.That's the international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide... canonical: https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/ author: Kathleen Kingsbury article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2008-05-20T04:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-23T03:55:26.871Z article:section: Health og:title: The Value of a Human Life: $129,000 og:description: In theory, a year of human life is priceless. In reality, it's worth $50,000.That's the international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide... og:url: https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte20997c26ea7ff12/698a4d8386f68e3a606f43d3/360_value_life_0520.jpg?branch=production&width=360&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 360 og:image:height: 203 og:image:alt: 360_value_life_0520.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Value of a Human Life: $129,000 twitter:description: In theory, a year of human life is priceless. In reality, it's worth $50,000.That's the international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide... twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte20997c26ea7ff12/698a4d8386f68e3a606f43d3/360_value_life_0520.jpg?branch=production&width=360&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  * [Health](/section/health/) # The Value of a Human Life: $129,000 > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=01ddd3bf-c5db-46a4-a6dc-118165908a0f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=01ddd3bf-c5db-46a4-a6dc-118165908a0f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=01ddd3bf-c5db-46a4-a6dc-118165908a0f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=01ddd3bf-c5db-46a4-a6dc-118165908a0f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Kathleen Kingsbury](https://time.com/author/kathleen-kingsbury/) May 20, 2008 4:00 AM UTC  Brooke Fasani / Corbis by [Kathleen Kingsbury](https://time.com/author/kathleen-kingsbury/) May 20, 2008 4:00 AM UTC In theory, a year of human life is priceless. In reality, it’s worth $50,000. That’s the international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide use to determine whether to cover a new medical procedure. More simply, insurance companies calculate that to make a treatment worth its cost, it must guarantee one year of “quality life” for $50,000 or less. New research, however, would argue that that figure is far too low. Stanford economists have demonstrated that the average value of a year of quality human life is actually closer to about $129,000\. To get to that number, Stefanos Zenios and his colleagues at Stanford Graduate School of Business used kidney dialysis as a benchmark. Every year dialysis saves the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans who would otherwise die of renal failure while waiting for an organ transplant. It is also the one procedure that Medicare has covered unconditionally since 1972 despite rapid and sometimes expensive innovations in its administration. To tally the cost-effectiveness of such innovations Zenios and his colleagues ran a computer analysis of more than half a million patients who underwent dialysis, adding up costs and comparing that data to treatment outcomes. Considering both inflation and new technologies in dialysis, they arrived at $129,000 as a more appropriate threshold for deciding coverage. “That means that if Medicare paid an additional $129,000 to treat a group of patients, on average, group members would get one more quality-adjusted life year,” Zenios says. Based on patient surveys, one “quality of life” year is defined as about two years of life on dialysis. Zenios’s conclusions arrive amidst mounting debate over whether Medicare, the U.S. government health plan for seniors, ought to use cost-effectiveness analysis in determining coverage of procedures. Nearly all other industrial nations — including Canada, Britain and the Netherlands — ration health care based on cost-effectiveness and the $50,000 threshold. Medicare, on the other hand, decides whether to pay for new technology based on whether a treatment is “medically necessary and appropriate.” But as health care expenses rise and entitlement programs grow fiscally strapped — at least one part of Medicare is now expected to be bankrupt by 2019 — more and more academics have called for this approach to be reconsidered, and for cost to become a factor. Such a move would mean that “if the incremental cost of a new technology was more than the threshold,” Zenios says, “then the recommendation would be that Medicare not cover that new technology.” Assigning a dollar figure to Medicare patients’ lives may sound crass, but such valuations are routine in Americans’ daily lives. Take, for example, the $500,000 death benefit the government pays families when a soldier is killed in Iraq or Afghanistan. Or the cost calculations that for-profit health insurers make to determine how much coverage they’ll give customers. In fact, at least some Americans seem at ease with allowing money to play a prominent role in health care decisions. In a 2007 survey of New Yorkers, 75% of participants felt “somewhat” to “very” comfortable with allowing cost to inform Medicare treatment decisions, once they understood how the system worked. “Americans understand and are prepared to engage the issues that arise when setting priorities and limits for their public programs,” Marthe Gold, the City University of New York Medical School professor who conducted the study, wrote with colleagues this past fall in the journal _Health Affairs._ The Stanford researchers caution that if Medicare fully adopted a cost-benefit analysis model, too many patients could be denied life-saving treatment. They return to the example of dialysis patients. Their study showed that for the sickest patients, the average cost of an additional quality-of-life year was much higher — $488,000\. “It is difficult to justify the burden and expense of dialysis when persons have other serious health conditions such as, for example, advanced dementia or cancer,” says co-author Glenn Chertow, a nephrology professor at the Stanford School of Medicine. “In these settings, dialysis is unlikely to provide any meaningful benefit.” But with organs including kidneys for transplant so scarce, is it justifiable to deny these patients a chance to live through dialysis? It is a question, Zenios says, everyone should approach with trepidation. “What is the true value of a human life? That’s what we’re asking people,” he adds. “I wouldn’t pretend to know.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/"},"headline":"The Value of a Human Life: $129,000","datePublished":"2008-05-20T04:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-23T03:55:26.871Z","description":"In theory, a year of human life is priceless. In reality, it's worth $50,000.That's the international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide...","url":"https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/","keywords":[],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte20997c26ea7ff12/698a4d8386f68e3a606f43d3/360_value_life_0520.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kathleen Kingsbury","url":"https://time.com/author/kathleen-kingsbury/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte20997c26ea7ff12/698a4d8386f68e3a606f43d3/360_value_life_0520.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"360_value_life_0520.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Brooke Fasani / Corbis","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/archive/6932586/the-value-of-a-human-life-129000/","name":"The Value of a Human Life: $129,000"}}]}] ```