Margaret Sanger last week had a second opportunity to beg Congress to lift Federal inhibitions against Birth Control. Senator Frederick Huntington Gillett, 79, Massachusetts, was her friend at court .his time. The other time (1924) her friend was another aged Senator, the late Albert Baird Cummins of Iowa, then 75. Senator Cummins had tried ineffectually to pass a law making contraceptive information and devices available to all the people, a liberty which Mrs. Sanger, a trained nurse, did not altogether approve. Senator Gillett is fostering a law to make such information and devices available only to doctors. If Congress were, through some reversal of national mores, to pass any such law it would have no practical effect in those States which forbid Birth Controlling within their dominions.
Nonetheless Senator Gillett, as chairman of a subcommittee of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee, listened to Mrs. Sanger and a squad of supporters. Then he listened to her opponents. Assisting him was Senator Sam Gilbert Bratton, 42, of New Mexico. Senator William Edgar Borah. 65. of Idaho, member of the subcommittee, stayed away. Senators’ wives crowded the hearing room.
Vigorous were the arguments for and against Birth Control.
Pro.”We want parenthood to be regarded as something beyond and above a casual accident or a punishment as a result of shiftlessness and recklessness.” —Mrs. Sanger.
“There is a huge bootleg trade in contraceptives. Accurate and competent advice in regard to Birth Control would save the lives of thousands of women, and a doctor who has this information and does not give it. incurs a terrible responsibility.”—John Whitridge Williams, Johns Hopkins obstetrician.
“The bird of war is not the eagle, but the stork.”—The Rev. Charles Francis Potter, Manhattan.
“We must control population. . . . We are forced to a choice. Nature’s remedies are pestilence, war, disease and famine. Personally I prefer to substitute the more human method to the cruel natural process.” —Henry Pratt Fairchild, New York University sociologist.
The Junior League of New York is “overwhelmingly in favor” of the Gillett Bill. “Our work in settlements and hospitals has shown us that control of the birth rate by this means is absolutely necessary.” —Mrs. Douglas M. Moffatt, chairman of the local League’s legislative committee.
Contra. Opponents to Birth Control were just as scrappy as Mrs. Sangers battlers: most of them were Roman Catholics, whose Pope has sternly denounced Birth Control (TIME, Jan. 19).
“The earth is capable of supporting 7,000,000,000 people and it now contains about 1,750,000,000.”
—Representative John W. McCormack of Massachusetts.
“The more sacrifice [marriage] entails, the greater the amount of happiness results.”
—Representative Mary Teresa Norton of New Jersey. (Her only son died.) “The gross obscenity of a pamphlet written by a woman in Brooklyn*is so shocking that if I were not controlled by Christian sentiment, I would feel like shooting a man who would hand such a pamphlet to one of my four daughters. [Doctors] have been able to give such advice as was necessary to their patients and would continue to do so.”
—Howard Atwood Kelly, Johns Hopkins surgeon.†”There was a new woman
Who lived in a shoe.
She had no children
For she knew what to do.”—Dr.
Henry Ware Cattell, Philadelphia, editor of International Clinics.
Rebuttal. Mrs. Sanger’s great, good and aged friend, Senator Gillett, gave her 15 minutes to rebut her critics. Rapidly and angrily she pounced on them: “Of women who visit Birth Control clinics 33% are Protestant, 32% Catholic, 31% Jewish. . . . We only ask that medical men be allowed to import contraceptive articles and that medical journals be permitted to print articles on the subject. . . .”
Referring to the argument that restricted families might prevent the birth of great men (viz. Benjamin Franklin, 10th son of his father, eighth child of his mother), Mrs. Sanger popped out: “I call your attention to the fact that the great leader of Christianity, Jesus Christ, was said to be an only child.” Her unlearned remark**immediately raised hubbub.
With cries of “blasphemy” and bitter recrimination, the Senate hearing ended.
*Mrs. Mary Ware Dennett of Astoria (TIME, May 6; June 3, 1929).
† In its recent (Jan. 12) report on Cancer, TIME said that Professor Kelly called scalpel surgery “knife-&-fork.” By “knife-&-fork” sur gery he meant electrosurgery, of which he is a vigorous advocate.
** Is not this the carpenter, the Son of Mary, the and Simon? Brother of and are James, not’ and His Joses, sisters and here of with Juda, us.
—Mark 6:3.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Your Vote Is Safe
- The Best Inventions of 2024
- How the Electoral College Actually Works
- Robert Zemeckis Just Wants to Move You
- Column: Fear and Hoping in Ohio
- How to Break 8 Toxic Communication Habits
- Why Vinegar Is So Good for You
- Meet TIME's Newest Class of Next Generation Leaders
Contact us at letters@time.com