For almost 16 years, a bitter battle has raged between Carter Products, Inc. and the Federal Trade Commission over one word: liver. The FTC first tried in 1943 to get the “Liver”‘ dropped from Carter’s Little Liver Pills. The pills, said the agency, did not help a sluggish liver, would not necessarily relieve that ”worn-out, sluggish, allin, listless, tired, stuffy, cranky, peevish, bogged-down” feeling. After 142 hearings in six cities (and 11,000 pages of testimony), the FTC issued a cease-and-desist order, only to have it tossed out by the U.S. Court of Appeals. After an appeal to the Supreme Court, which ordered further hearings, the FTC tried again in 1956. The pills, compounded chiefly of podophyllin (resin of dried root of the mayapple plant) and aloes (dried juice of the aloe plant), still do not stimulate liver bile, said the FTC.
Last week the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld the FTC finding that Carter’s basic therapeutic claim is “false and misleading,” ordered “Liver” deleted from the trade name. Carter Products announced that it would appeal to the Supreme Court, continue the case that has already cost taxpayers more than $1,000,000.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Introducing the 2024 TIME100 Next
- Sabrina Carpenter Has Waited Her Whole Life for This
- What Lies Ahead for the Middle East
- Why It's So Hard to Quit Vaping
- Jeremy Strong on Taking a Risk With a New Film About Trump
- Our Guide to Voting in the 2024 Election
- The 10 Races That Will Determine Control of the Senate
- Column: How My Shame Became My Strength
Contact us at letters@time.com