Among almost 100 pages of advertising in last week’s A.M.A. Journal, only 1½ pages were cigarette puffs. And in these, advertisers made no medical claims—merely said that their brands were low in nicotine or equipped with good filters. But in future, even such mild statements will be barred from the Journal and eleven other A.M.A. publications.
After Jan. 1, the A.M.A. has decided, it will take no advertising for cigarettes or other tobacco products and smokers’ aids such as filters. (At the same time it will drop ads for alcoholic drinks.) The main reason: members do not feel that the A.M.A. should take business from manufacturers who in the lay press cram their ads with medical claims. Also, there is the matter of the extent to which heavy and long-continued cigarette smoking can cause lung cancer. Cost to the A.M.A. in lost revenue: about $115,000 a year.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Where Trump 2.0 Will Differ From 1.0
- How Elon Musk Became a Kingmaker
- The Power—And Limits—of Peer Support
- The 100 Must-Read Books of 2024
- Column: If Optimism Feels Ridiculous Now, Try Hope
- The Future of Climate Action Is Trade Policy
- FX’s Say Nothing Is the Must-Watch Political Thriller of 2024
- Merle Bombardieri Is Helping People Make the Baby Decision
Contact us at letters@time.com