For the fourth time, the New York Times’s august Arthur Krock wrote last week that the U.S. Army is thinking of replacing civilian war correspondents with soldier reporters. The Army swarmed all over him. Growled Colonel Stanley Grogan, acting director of the War Department’s public relations bureau: “There has never been any study of the question by the War Department and none is contemplated.”
War Secretary Henry L. Stimson was kinder, but no less firm. “Has my good friend Arthur Krock been sending shivers down your spine?” he asked reporters at his press conference. “There is no plan in the War Department to use military correspondents to replace civilians. There are now more than 230 civilian correspondents in the war theaters and they are doing a splendid job.”
More Must-Reads from TIME
- How Donald Trump Won
- The Best Inventions of 2024
- Why Sleep Is the Key to Living Longer
- Robert Zemeckis Just Wants to Move You
- How to Break 8 Toxic Communication Habits
- Nicola Coughlan Bet on Herself—And Won
- Why Vinegar Is So Good for You
- Meet TIME's Newest Class of Next Generation Leaders
Contact us at letters@time.com