Last week Great Britain took a stand on Far Eastern policy as forceful as that of the outspoken U. S. In a long, sharp note, which greatly resembled Secretary of State Cordell Hull’s New Year’s demands on Japan, Britain plainly showed that “appeasement” does not extend to the Orient:
“His Majesty’s Government desire to make it clear that they are not prepared to accept or to recognize changes of the nature indicated [closing of China’s Open Door] which are brought about by force. They intend to adhere to the principles of the Nine-Power Treaty and cannot agree to unilateral modification of its terms.”
Like the U. S., Britain professed willingness to discuss treaty revisions with Japan, but only in conference with “a fully independent Chinese Government when peace has been restored.”
At week’s end France also was reported to be preparing what was termed in diplomatic circles a “last warning” to Japan before the Democracies resorted to economic pressure.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Inside Elon Musk’s War on Washington
- Meet the 2025 Women of the Year
- The Harsh Truth About Disability Inclusion
- Why Do More Young Adults Have Cancer?
- Colman Domingo Leads With Radical Love
- How to Get Better at Doing Things Alone
- Cecily Strong on Goober the Clown
- Column: The Rise of America’s Broligarchy
Contact us at letters@time.com