Back in 1996, at the time Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, I wrote a story for this magazine suggesting that individual states might have different types of unions for same-sex and heterosexual couples. Seventeen years later, that seems like a quaint and very outdated idea. As David Von Drehle’s cover story makes clear, over the past four decades there has been a rapid evolution in thinking about same-sex marriage. Whatever the Supreme Court decides, it seems clear that the majority of Americans feel marriage is a civil right and that denying that right to people because of their sexual orientation is a violation of equal protection under the law. The idea of same-sex marriage makes many people uncomfortable, but the court suggested in the past that equal protection and the right to privacy trump moral disapproval. Speaking of uncomfortable ideas: we had a long debate in our offices about this week’s cover images of two same-sex couples. Some thought they were sensationalist and too in-your-face. Others felt the images were beautiful and symbolized the love that is at the heart of the idea of marriage. I agree with the latter, and I hope you do too.
Richard Stengel, MANAGING EDITOR
More Must-Reads from TIME
- L.A. Fires Show Reality of 1.5°C of Warming
- Behind the Scenes of The White Lotus Season Three
- How Trump 2.0 Is Already Sowing Confusion
- Bad Bunny On Heartbreak and New Album
- How to Get Better at Doing Things Alone
- We’re Lucky to Have Been Alive in the Age of David Lynch
- The Motivational Trick That Makes You Exercise Harder
- Column: All Those Presidential Pardons Give Mercy a Bad Name
Contact us at letters@time.com