--- title: Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals description: Sustainability executives are wrestling with what their role should be amid continued challenges. canonical: https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-02-20T21:52:09.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-19T11:47:11.001Z article:section: Climate og:title: Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals og:description: Sustainability executives are wrestling with what their role should be amid continued challenges. og:url: https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5fedb07583eef693/69b048661b00109f17a43211/solar-panel-industrial-roof.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: hc022624MontroseSolar (2).jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals twitter:description: Sustainability executives are wrestling with what their role should be amid continued challenges. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5fedb07583eef693/69b048661b00109f17a43211/solar-panel-industrial-roof.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=9214e117-2bf9-40da-856e-ab38a321bd56&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 40,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 34.2% | TIME, August 2026 | | Click rate | 2.1% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=9214e117-2bf9-40da-856e-ab38a321bd56&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=9214e117-2bf9-40da-856e-ab38a321bd56&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. It reaches 40,000 subscribers with a 34.2% open rate and a 2.1% click rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Justin Worland / Phoenix](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland / Phoenix Senior Correspondent Feb 20, 2026 9:52 PM UTC  Installed solar panels are visible in the foreground while the downtown Houston skyline is visible from the roof of the apartment complex in 2024. Installed solar panels are visible in the foreground while the downtown Houston skyline is visible from the roof of the apartment complex in 2024. Kirk Sides/Houston Chronicle—Getty Images  by [Justin Worland / Phoenix](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland / Phoenix Senior Correspondent Feb 20, 2026 9:52 PM UTC It was hard to go even a few minutes at this year’s GreenBiz conference without hearing about the business case for sustainability. Over and over, executives repeated that efforts to cut emissions were also reducing waste, cutting costs, and delivering durable efficiency gains. It’s a perfectly reasonable pitch. It’s also a much more modest one compared to the sustainability zeitgeist of just a few years ago when companies proclaimed a green transformation to be the growth story of the 21st century. In some ways it was a necessary reset. In the heyday of ESG investing, trillions poured into [vague notions of sustainability](https://time.com/6273398/esg-explained/) with a vision of enormous returns but without a clear plan. Getting precise is necessary, but in reframing the business case for climate and sustainability around efficiency, businesses risk missing the excitement—and capital—that comes with growth. At the GreenBiz conference in Phoenix, sustainability executives wrestled with what their role should be amid government pushback against efforts to tackle climate change and the public’s prioritization of other issues. Many executives told me how their jobs have become focused more on compliance with the myriad [rules](https://time.com/7172697/how-europe-csrd-is-changing-business/) and [regulations](https://time.com/6898732/sec-climate-rule-fight/). Despite [roll backs](https://time.com/7378527/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-new-climate-era/) from the U.S. federal government, other countries and some U.S. states continue to pursue a range of climate regulations. Some spoke of concerns about shrinking sustainability teams as CEOs prioritized other issues. Almost all of them said they had managed to continue making climate progress by finding ways to save the business money. Finding efficiencies is a necessary component of decarbonization, but as sustainability-focused professionals consider the future of their positions and their field, they will need to figure out how to make climate and sustainability key to tantalizing growth, not just marginal efficiency gains. There’s perhaps no clearer indication of the existential questions lingering for sustainability executives than the conference’s on-stage debate over whether the chief sustainability officer (CSO) role has become irrelevant. At the crux of the debate wasn’t whether sustainability is important. That was taken as a given. Instead, the discussion largely centered on whether sustainability is best situated in its own department or whether everyone—from finance to strategy—needs to take up sustainability on their own. Judging simply by the crowd’s response, the debaters arguing that CSOs remain relevant won handily. To me, the winning argument was simply that someone within the company needs to be willing and able to make the case to counterparts elsewhere in the organization. “The CSO serves as a compass,” said Olubamise Onabanjo, manager of sustainability reporting at E.L.F. Beauty**,** from the debate stage. But where is the compass pointing? There’s a hard truth that many executives are wrestling with behind the scenes: in many cases the business case for big, growth-oriented investments isn’t immediately clear. A C-suite[ survey](https://www.conference-board.org/pdfdownload.cfm?masterProductID=85690) released by The Conference Board in January found that while a majority of CEOs globally still say they are prioritizing sustainability, they view waste reduction and efficiency as their top ways to tackle the issue. Greening the supply chain and green product innovation rank lower. Jesper Brodin, the former CEO of Ingka Group, the primary operator of IKEA stores, told me earlier this month that the efficiency return on investment from sustainability is easy to see across industries. “It has great impact on your cost side,” he said. “The business upside of climate smart transformation depends a little bit on which type of business you are.” Some of the most interesting moments in Phoenix came in discussion with executives who are arguing that sustainability can drive growth and innovation. Executives at consumer facing companies repeatedly pointed with amazement to[ research](https://hbr.org/2025/06/research-products-labeled-as-sustainable-sell-better) about Amazon showing that products labeled as “Climate Pledge Friendly,” meaning they met certain sustainability metrics, saw a 14% bump in sales immediately after being labeled. In other words, investing in sustainability can drive business growth. Perhaps there’s no better example of a decarbonization innovation eventually becoming a growth engine than in the energy sector. A generation ago, the business case for energy sources like solar and technologies like battery storage rested in large part on vague notions of coming regulatory risk and the need for energy security. The road has been much windier than anticipated, but today returns are being realized as the cost of those technologies have come down and demand for electricity is growing. Realistically, big companies are risk-averse. Investments need a decent guarantee of return. But efficiency may not be enough to put sustainability back at the pinnacle of the business zeitgeist. _To get this story in your inbox, subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter_ [_here_](https://timeco2.beehiiv.com/subscribe)_._ _This story is supported by a partnership with_ [_Outrider Foundation_](https://outrider.org/) _and Journalism Funding Partners. TIME is solely responsible for the content_. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/"},"headline":"Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals","datePublished":"2026-02-20T21:52:09.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-19T11:47:11.001Z","description":"Sustainability executives are wrestling with what their role should be amid continued challenges.","url":"https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/","keywords":["Leadership Report"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5fedb07583eef693/69b048661b00109f17a43211/solar-panel-industrial-roof.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland / Phoenix"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5fedb07583eef693/69b048661b00109f17a43211/solar-panel-industrial-roof.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"hc022624MontroseSolar (2).jpg","caption":"hc022624MontroseSolar (2).jpg","creditText":"Kirk Sides/Houston Chronicle—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/co2-leadership-report/","name":"Leadership Report"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7380175/climate-sustainability-company-goals-2026/","name":"Companies Are Choosing Efficiency Over Bold Climate Goals"}}]}] ```