--- title: The History of the Endangerment Finding description: The Trump Administration has repealed the landmark scientific finding that provides a legal basis for tackling climate change. canonical: https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/ author: Simmone Shah article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-02-12T19:01:40.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-11T00:55:29.997Z article:section: Climate og:title: The History of the Endangerment Finding og:description: The Trump Administration has repealed the landmark scientific finding that provides a legal basis for tackling climate change. og:url: https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt574936161fdd0584/6998cf2d1500fba2adaa7296/trump-lee-zeldin-epa-endangerment-finding-climate-history.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-ENVIRONMENT og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The History of the Endangerment Finding twitter:description: The Trump Administration has repealed the landmark scientific finding that provides a legal basis for tackling climate change. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt574936161fdd0584/6998cf2d1500fba2adaa7296/trump-lee-zeldin-epa-endangerment-finding-climate-history.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The History of the Endangerment Finding > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=163e2161-99c4-4ef0-8e7a-56bd6dfe22ec&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 40,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 34.2% | TIME, August 2026 | | Click rate | 2.1% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=163e2161-99c4-4ef0-8e7a-56bd6dfe22ec&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=163e2161-99c4-4ef0-8e7a-56bd6dfe22ec&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. It reaches 40,000 subscribers with a 34.2% open rate and a 2.1% click rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Simmone Shah](https://time.com/author/simmone-shah/)  ## Simmone Shah Reporter Feb 12, 2026 7:01 PM UTC  President Donald Trump on Thursday revoked a landmark scientific finding that underpins U.S. regulations aimed at curbing planet-warming pollution, marking the administration's most far-reaching rollback of climate policy to date. President Donald Trump on Thursday revoked a landmark scientific finding that underpins U.S. regulations aimed at curbing planet-warming pollution, marking the administration's most far-reaching rollback of climate policy to date. SAUL LOEB / AFP—Getty Images  by [Simmone Shah](https://time.com/author/simmone-shah/)  ## Simmone Shah Reporter Feb 12, 2026 7:01 PM UTC The Trump Administration repealed the endangerment finding on Thursday, marking its most aggressive climate rollback to date. The landmark legal framework allowed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Revoking the finding now gives the administration authority to erase greenhouse gas pollution limits from cars, power plants, and industries. Repealing the rule has been a top priority for the Trump Administration. On the first day of his second term, President Trump signed an executive order directing the EPA to submit a report on “the legality and continuing applicability” of the endangerment finding. On Thursday, he called the termination,“the single largest deregulatory action in American history.” The decision is a blow to decades of environmental progress in the United States. “It's the foundation on which all of the other regulations rest,” Chris Field, director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, says of the endangerment finding. “It is the authorization to regulate greenhouse gasses, and without that authorization the legal basis for regulating emissions from automobiles and power plants, is fuzzy at best and potentially non existent.” ## What is the endangerment finding? The endangerment finding is a 2009 EPA ruling that determined greenhouse gases were a threat to public health. The finding originated from a 2007 Supreme Court case, _Massachusetts v. EPA_, in which the Court ruled that greenhouse gases qualify as pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Following the ruling, the Court ordered the EPA to determine whether greenhouse gasses endanger public health and welfare. The EPA concluded in the 2009 endangerment finding that six greenhouse gases—including carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrofluorocarbons—posed a threat to the public. The agency was then able to use those findings to regulate emissions from cars, trucks, and power plants. “They concluded, based on a vast body of information, that greenhouse gas emission from the combustion of fossil fuel and other sources endanger public health and well being, and that sets the foundation for the requirement for the government to regulate the sources of these gasses,” says Field. ## How does the endangerment finding protect environmental and public health? The decision provided the backbone for regulation from everything from pollution from coal and gas-fired power plants to car and truck exhaust. “We have seen dramatic improvements in the efficiency of the electricity sector, in terms of the amount of carbon per unit of electricity produced. We've seen dramatic increases in the efficiency of vehicles in terms of miles traveled per carbon dioxide reduced,” says Field. Overall greenhouse gas emissions have, for the most part, been trending downward in the U.S. over the last decade, he notes, though preliminary estimates show that the same [won’t be true](https://rhg.com/research/us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2025/) for 2025 emissions. During the announcement, Trump said that the endangerment finding “had no basis in fact.” Science shows, however, that cutting back on all this pollution is proven to bring huge health benefits. A large body of research has linked air pollution from greenhouse gasses to adverse health effects. Air pollution from burning fossil fuels can cause a [number](https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-climate-environmental-and-health-impacts-of-fossil-fuels-2021) of health issues, including asthma, cancer, heart disease, and premature death. A [2025 study](https://time.com/7311655/us-oil-gas-air-pollution-health-impacts-study/) found that air pollution from oil and gas is responsible for more than 91,000 premature deaths and hundreds of thousands of health issues across the United States each year—with Black, Asian, Native American, and Hispanic groups consistently among the most affected. A separate [study](https://www.nber.org/papers/w26381) found that fine particulate matter air pollution declined 24% between 2009 and 2016, before rising due to a decrease in enforcement of the Clean Air Act, coupled with increases in economic activity, and wildfires in the west. ## Why does the Trump Administration want to repeal the endangerment finding? The finding has been challenged a number of times over the years. Most notably, two groups— Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council (CHECC) and the FAIR Energy Foundation—filed multiple petitions for reconsideration of the endangerment finding in 2017 and 2019\. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit [dismissed their lawsuits](https://blogs.edf.org/climate411/wp-content/blogs.dir/7/files/2023/05/Endangerment-Determination-May-25-2023.pdf?%5Fgl=1%2A19qrfmz%2A%5Fgcl%5Fau%2ANDQ1MjE2Nzk0LjE3Njc4ODg0MzguMTc0MDIzMTY5NC4xNzY3ODg4NDYxLjE3Njc4ODg1MTM.%2A%5Fga%2AMjY0ODc5MzgwLjE3Njc4ODg0Mzg.%2A%5Fga%5F2B3856Y9QW%2AczE3NzA4MjkwODckbzYkZzEkdDE3NzA4Mjk0ODckajU0JGwwJGgw), calling their arguments “inadequate, erroneous, and deficient.” The groups asked the Supreme Court to reconsider the case, but the request was denied. Project 2025, the conservative policy playbook created by think tank the [Heritage Foundation](https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025%5FMandateForLeadership%5FFULL.pdf), also lays out a plan to “establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding.” The Heritage Foundation has [said](https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/reversing-the-epas-endangerment-finding-greenhouse-gases) that the EPA “used the finding to justify sweeping restrictions on CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions across the economy, imposing huge costs.” The EPA has said that the rollback would save taxpayers over $1.3 trillion and bring car prices down by almost $3,000, though they didn’t provide details on how they came up with the number. The Trump Administration’s ruling is likely to face legal challenges from environmental groups. The scientific evidence supporting the endangerment finding—and the impact of greenhouse gasses on the planet—can’t be denied. “The science is incredibly strong, stronger now, far stronger now than it was in 2009 when it was already pretty strong,” says Robert Howarth, professor of ecology and environmental biology at Cornell University. “How can you go from science which was very, very strong in 2009 and is only stronger now in 2026 to saying science isn't strong enough to support it. You cannot. That's not a scientific judgment. That's a political judgment.” The impact cannot be understated, says Dr. Lynn Goldman, professor of environmental and occupational health at the George Washington University, who previously led the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention at the EPA from 1993 through 1998 under President Bill Clinton. “One of the most effective things we've ever done for public health is lowering air pollution. It has had an incredibly strong payoff,” she says, adding that a reversal of the endangerment finding would put millions of people's lives at risk from air pollution. “If they're successful with doing this, there will be a huge economic impact through the cost of not only lives lost, but all the health care costs that will be caused by not addressing climate change here in the United States and worldwide.It's just a huge multiplier.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/"},"headline":"The History of the Endangerment Finding","datePublished":"2026-02-12T19:01:40.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-11T00:55:29.997Z","description":"The Trump Administration has repealed the landmark scientific finding that provides a legal basis for tackling climate change.","url":"https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/","keywords":["policy","climate change"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt574936161fdd0584/6998cf2d1500fba2adaa7296/trump-lee-zeldin-epa-endangerment-finding-climate-history.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Simmone Shah","jobTitle":"Reporter","url":"https://time.com/author/simmone-shah/"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt574936161fdd0584/6998cf2d1500fba2adaa7296/trump-lee-zeldin-epa-endangerment-finding-climate-history.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-ENVIRONMENT","caption":"President Donald Trump on Thursday revoked a landmark scientific finding that underpins U.S. regulations aimed at curbing planet-warming pollution, marking the administration's most far-reaching rollback of climate policy to date.","creditText":"SAUL LOEB / AFP—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/policy/","name":"policy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7377810/trump-epa-endangerment-finding-repeal-history/","name":"The History of the Endangerment Finding"}}]}] ```