<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/" -->

---
title: 5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection
description: &quot;If the events of Jan. 6 were to occur today, I fear they would have been deadlier,&quot; writes Douglas Letter.
canonical: https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/
author: Douglas Letter
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2026-01-06T11:01:00.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-03-11T00:44:00.591Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: 5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection
og:description: &quot;If the events of Jan. 6 were to occur today, I fear they would have been deadlier,&quot; writes Douglas Letter.
og:url: https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: Trump Supporters January 6
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: 5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection
twitter:description: &quot;If the events of Jan. 6 were to occur today, I fear they would have been deadlier,&quot; writes Douglas Letter.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)

IDEAS  
Time ideas


# 5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="14750e3f-920e-4257-ab63-ec1c68b374bf" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=14750e3f-920e-4257-ab63-ec1c68b374bf&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=14750e3f-920e-4257-ab63-ec1c68b374bf&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=14750e3f-920e-4257-ab63-ec1c68b374bf&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Douglas Letter](https://time.com/author/douglas-letter/)


## Douglas Letter


Letter is the Chief Legal Officer at Brady and former General Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives

Jan 6, 2026 11:01 AM UTC

![Trump Supporters January 6](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Protesters supporting U.S. President Donald Trump break into the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Protesters supporting U.S. President Donald Trump break into the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. Win McNamee—Getty Images

by 

[Douglas Letter](https://time.com/author/douglas-letter/)


## Douglas Letter


Letter is the Chief Legal Officer at Brady and former General Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives

Jan 6, 2026 11:01 AM UTC

On Jan. 6, 2021, I was in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives as violent insurrectionists [attacked](https://time.com/5927132/donald-trump-mob-capitol-chaos/) our nation’s Capitol, bent on interrupting Congress in carrying out its constitutional responsibilities and doing serious harm to [Vice President Pence](https://time.com/6199590/mike-pence-secret-service-jan-6-hearings/), Speaker of the House [Nancy Pelosi](https://time.com/6082950/pelosi-mcarthy-january-6-committee/), and members of Congress. 

As I reflect on this dark day for our precious—and often fragile—American democracy, I keep returning to one of the underlying forces helping to fuel the violence: Second Amendment extremism. 

Second Amendment extremism comes from what legal scholars [describe](https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv3znzcm) as the “insurrectionist” interpretation of the Second Amendment. This seriously flawed reading [believes](https://www.bradyunited.org/resources/issues/second-amendment-extremism) that Americans have a right under the Constitution, and even an obligation, to [take up arms](https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/us-capitol-attack-rioters-had-weapons-including-firearms-2025-01-16/) against the government when they disagree with its direction. At the core of this extremism is the dangerous view that the founders viewed aggrieved citizens who attack the government through armed violence as righteous patriots, rather than the enemies of the state.

This perspective that America’s founders supported insurrectionism is baseless. Take, for instance, President George Washington in 1794, who used the army and state militias to crush the Whiskey Rebellion. Or President Abraham Lincoln, who in 1865 led victory against the Confederacy and its attempt to destroy our nation through an armed rebellion designed to preserve the institution of human slavery. 


Yet shockingly, this theory is [increasingly](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/poll-americans-guns-against-government) embraced by many Americans today, including many of the foot soldiers in the Jan. 6 [insurrection](https://time.com/6277254/proud-boys-verdict-jan-6-insurrection/), along with possibly some [Supreme Court Justices](https://time.com/6692956/trump-supreme-court-insurrection-jan-6/) and [President Donald Trump](https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/completed-evolution-trump-sees-jan-6-rioters-patriots-n1288524) himself. Further endangering our democracy is America’s uniquely powerful [gun industry](https://time.com/6207280/gun-industry-us-history/), which promotes and profits from armed [vigilantism](https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/02/militants-kenosha-vigilante-second-amendment-law/). For decades, the gun industry has used [rhetoric](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/10/opinion/america-gun-violence.html) that encourages violence against lawmakers and democratic institutions in the thoroughly mistaken name of “freedom.”

The Jan. 6 attack was therefore not an isolated riot. It was [fueled](https://www.bradyunited.org/resources/research/origin-of-an-insurrection) in part by [gun industry](https://time.com/6329152/magical-thinking-guns-power-essay/) marketing, intensified by America’s dangerously lax gun laws, and intertwined with an ever-growing [white supremacist movement](https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/white-supremacist-violence-online-extremism-charlottesville-terrorgram/).

Now, after nearly a year of Trump’s second administration—with its dangerous pro-gun agenda and insurrectionist view of the Second Amendment—it terrifies me to imagine what another insurrection could do to our democracy.


Instead of taking action to prevent armed political violence, and all types of gun violence that devastate communities, the Trump Administration has decided to [ratchet up attacks on political opponents](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-attacks-political-opponents-spur-surge-threats-nbc-news-review-f-rcna247201) and worked to [loosen](https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2025-06-18/trump-gun-minnesota-shooting-violence) gun regulations.

We have continued to witness the tragic consequences of political violence and dangerous rhetoric, including the [assassination](https://time.com/7294233/minnesota-lawmakers-melissa-hortman-husband-killed-john-hoffman-wife-shot/) of Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, and the attack on State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. 

Sadly, not even the [attacks](https://time.com/7301662/donald-trump-butler-pa-assassination/) directed on Trump himself or the [assassination](https://time.com/7316280/charlie-kirk-dead-political-violence/) of [Charlie Kirk](https://time.com/7316434/gabby-giffords-mourn-charlie-kirk-family/) have caused this administration to reconsider its gun-based ideology. Moreover, the [ever-increasing](https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/new-report-highlights-us-2023-gun-deaths-suicide-by-firearm-at-record-levels-for-third-straight-year) use of firearms in suicides among youth, military veterans, and active duty troops as well as the ghastly toll of American children murdered in their [schools](https://time.com/7341412/brown-shooting-student-saugus-high-school/), [churches](https://time.com/7313302/minneapolis-shooting-children-victims-dead-injured-names-ages-gofundme-fundraisers/), and neighborhoods has somehow not caused the Trump Administration to reconsider its gun-friendly policies. 


Political violence is contagious. It is deadly. And it threatens our American republic. Yet in just a single year, the Trump Administration has not only [quietly eroded](https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2025-06-18/trump-gun-minnesota-shooting-violence) our nation’s already weak federal gun safety laws, but also designed a uniquely dangerous tinder box in our nation’s capital. 

Early in his second term, the President pardoned and [restored](https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5205204-justice-department-gun-rights-criminal-convictions/) gun rights to politically violent individuals [including](https://www.npr.org/2025/01/30/nx-s1-5276336/donald-trump-jan-6-rape-assault-pardons-rioters) Jan. 6 insurrectionists. Later, by the dictate of the U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro, federal prosecutors [stopped pursuing felony charges](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/01/jeanine-pirro-gun-laws-washington-open-carry/) for the open carry of long guns and high-capacity magazines in our nation’s capital. 

And just last month, the Trump Department of Justice quietly [created](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-department-plans-gun-rights-office-within-civil-rights-unit-2025-11-25/) a new Second Amendment Section. Charged with “investigating” and rolling back local gun laws, one of its first actions—made just two weeks before the anniversary of the Jan. 6 insurrection—was to [challenge](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy7v4pg2edno) D.C.’s assault weapons ban. 


These weapons of war have absolutely no place on any street in America. [In fact](https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/ban-assault-weapons.html), assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are used disproportionately in mass public shootings and killings of law enforcement officers compared with gun murders overall.

Beyond D.C., the Trump Administration has tirelessly worked to [gut](https://www.npr.org/2025/07/02/nx-s1-5440343/trump-administration-atf-jobs-gun-restrictions) the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), including [slashing](https://www.thetrace.org/2025/04/atf-bondi-gun-store-license-biden-policy/) inspections of rogue gun dealers, and [diverting](https://www.reuters.com/world/how-immigration-swallowed-up-federal-gun-crime-efforts-2025-12-22/) resources from gun crime to immigration enforcement, and [repealed funding](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-administration-slashed-federal-funding-gun-violence-prevention-2025-07-29/) for programs proven to reduce firearm violence. Together, these actions weaken the systems designed to have gun dealers follow the law and keep guns out of dangerous hands. 

If the events of Jan. 6 were to occur today, I fear they would have been deadlier. The District’s strong gun laws, including its bans on semi-automatic weapons and open carry, likely stopped some rioters from arming themselves and inflicting mass casualties. Police made many gun arrests between Jan. 5 and 7, and insurrectionists [left weapons behind in Virginia](https://abcnews.go.com/US/oath-keepers-stashed-weapons-hotel-potential-jan-violence/story?id=77048420) because they were illegal in D.C. 


Today, however, the current lack of enforcement of the District’s gun safety laws threaten to make the kind of insurrection I survived five years ago even more dangerous.

This is why we must demand that state and federal lawmakers take sensible measures like passing universal background checks, bolstering extreme risk laws, banning assault weapons, and ensuring proper oversight of the gun industry. 

We can prevent gun violence and political violence. But to do so, we must change course and demand a safer country.

[TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/"},"headline":"5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection","datePublished":"2026-01-06T11:01:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-11T00:44:00.591Z","description":"\"If the events of Jan. 6 were to occur today, I fear they would have been deadlier,\" writes Douglas Letter.","url":"https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Douglas Letter","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/douglas-letter/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt04a9200c9120c537/6998cca2f1b082549c6f1f9e/Trump-Supporters-Jan-6.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Trump Supporters January 6","caption":"Trump Supporters January 6","creditText":"Win McNamee—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/","name":"5 Years Since the Jan. 6 Insurrection"}}]}]
```

