--- title: Military Voting is an American Tradition description: An upcoming SCOTUS case of could make it harder for military members to vote. canonical: https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/ author: Ellen Gustafson article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-11-26T11:15:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:36:47.304Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Military Voting is an American Tradition og:description: An upcoming SCOTUS case of could make it harder for military members to vote. og:url: https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaffe0e8230c96a42/6998cbfae1ba00b1cb98e27c/SCOTUS-flag.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2120 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: American flag flapping boldly in the wind with The Supreme Court in Washington DC, USA. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Military Voting is an American Tradition twitter:description: An upcoming SCOTUS case of could make it harder for military members to vote. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaffe0e8230c96a42/6998cbfae1ba00b1cb98e27c/SCOTUS-flag.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Military Voting is an American Tradition. Let’s Keep It That Way > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=03f2f36f-a386-44a2-862f-5d065f7dfc18&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=03f2f36f-a386-44a2-862f-5d065f7dfc18&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=03f2f36f-a386-44a2-862f-5d065f7dfc18&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=03f2f36f-a386-44a2-862f-5d065f7dfc18&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Ellen Gustafson](https://time.com/author/ellen-gustafson/) and [Samantha Tarazi](https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/) Ellen Gustafson is a Navy spouse and executive director of We the Veterans and Military Families Samantha Tarazi is CEO and co-founder of Voting Rights Lab Nov 26, 2025 11:15 AM UTC  The American flag waves next to The Supreme Court in Washington, DC. The American flag waves next to The Supreme Court in Washington, DC. Prasit photo—Getty Images by [Ellen Gustafson](https://time.com/author/ellen-gustafson/) and [Samantha Tarazi](https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/) Ellen Gustafson is a Navy spouse and executive director of We the Veterans and Military Families Samantha Tarazi is CEO and co-founder of Voting Rights Lab Nov 26, 2025 11:15 AM UTC This year, the United States military is celebrating its 250th anniversary—two and a half centuries of Americans making the immense sacrifice to defend our fundamental freedoms and uphold the promise of self-governance at home and around the globe. As we commemorate this milestone, the least we can do is ensure that those who serve and their families can continue to participate freely and fairly in our elections. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a case that could put military members’ ability to vote, and to participate in the democracy they fight hard to defend, at risk. The case of [_Watson v. Republican National Committee_](https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/the-supreme-courts-new-voting-case-will-test-its-supposed-nonpartisanship/) challenges a Mississippi law which allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted, so long as they arrive within five business days. Over two dozen other states have [similar laws](https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/table-11-receipt-and-postmark-deadlines-for-absentee-mail-ballots) which provide flexibility for military members voting from overseas. Now, the case before the SCOTUS could impact these servicemembers—and disrupt a long American tradition of military voting. For more than 150 years, America has enabled troops stationed far from home to cast their ballots. The first large-scale use of absentee voting dates back to the Civil War, when [19 Union states](https://www.history.com/articles/vote-by-mail-soldiers-war) passed laws allowing soldiers to vote from the battlefield. That year, roughly [150,000 soldiers](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/how-do-you-know-voting-mail-works-u-s-military-n1186926) exercised their freedom to vote from the front lines of the war. Today’s battlefields and the technology may have changed, but the principle remains the same. Our service members are stationed around the world—from ships at sea to bases in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. These voters, including active-duty military personnel, their families, and civilians working on base, must navigate a unique set of barriers to voting from abroad, ranging from frequent relocations to limited access to mail systems to the need to protect sensitive personal information. At the same time, these voters must also follow strict procedures set by their respective “home-of-record” states to ensure their votes remain secure. Historically, state and federal leaders have worked collaboratively to overcome these barriers. The Soldier Voting Act of 1942 and the Federal Voting Assistance Act of 1955 required states to send ballots to military service members, but there was no standardized system in place. In 1986, Congress addressed this problem with the [Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act](https://www.fvap.gov/info/laws/uocava) (UOCAVA). UOCAVA created a set of standardized tools to enable a more uniform and secure process for military voting. In 2009, Congress [strengthened these protections](https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2011/01/06/MOVE%5FAct.pdf) by requiring ballots to be sent at least 45 days before federal elections and mandating that ballots be available electronically. Over the past few years, however, this once-unifying issue has been pulled into the political crossfire. Existing, well-established laws designed to protect military voters have been caught in a [web of litigation](https://votingrightslab.org/2025/10/22/150-years-of-military-and-overseas-voting-now-under-threat/), [ill-conceived state laws](https://tracker.votingrightslab.org/issues/returning-verifying-and-curing-mail-ballots?law=8), an [executive order](https://votingrightslab.org/report/trump-executive-order-sends-message-to-state-allies-to-implement-upheaval-of-election-laws/), and [changes to federal policy](https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration/military-overseas-voters) that altogether make it harder for military voters and their families to participate in American elections. States such as Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas have [proposed new barriers](https://votingrightslab.org/2025/08/25/mail-voting-is-under-attack-again/) to mail-in voting processes—and by extension, to overseas and military voters—through burdensome [proof-of-citizenship requirements](https://votingrightslab.org/2025/04/17/voter-id-is-not-documentary-proof-of-citizenship-heres-why-that-matters/) and narrow residency requirements for voting by mail. None of these bills passed in 2025, but efforts to restrict mail-in voting continue today. [North Carolina](https://votingrightslab.org/2025/05/07/will-of-north-carolina-voters-prevails-in-supreme-court-election-but-dangerous-precedent-set/) offers a cautionary tale of just how at-risk military and overseas voters are today. State supreme court candidate Judge Jefferson Griffin demanded that courts throw out 1,675 valid [military and overseas votes](https://abc11.com/post/military-overseas-voters-center-challenges-riggs-griffin-north-carolina-supreme-court-race/16205774/) in a contentious legal battle over his narrow loss in the 2024 Supreme Court election. Griffin’s lawsuit challenged ballots cast by military and overseas voters, even though they had followed state law when they registered to vote and cast their ballots. While Griffin [eventually conceded](https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/griffin-concedes-riggs-ending-six-month-dispute-over-north-carolina), his efforts to invalidate these votes cast doubt on the system that ensures American men and women serving our country overseas have a voice in our democracy back home. Here’s the truth: military and overseas voting is how military families have always had their votes count, and it’s safe, secure, and trustworthy. Every voter must prove they’re a [qualified U.S. citizen](https://votingrightslab.org/report/state-and-federal-law-ensures-only-citizens-can-vote-in-u-s-elections/) and provide personal identification, such as their date of birth, Social Security number, and driver’s license number. Meanwhile, a bipartisan team of election officials checks every voter’s eligibility and confirms their identity through additional steps, such as signature matching—all while protecting ballot privacy. Our system for military voting is strong. Still, military families deserve [improvements](https://votingrightslab.org/report/four-essential-steps-states-can-take-to-safeguard-our-elections/), and states are already leading the way. Thirty-one states now offer secure [electronic ballot return options](https://www.fvap.gov/uploads/FVAP/States/eVAG.pdf), allowing military and overseas voters to submit their ballots online. Given the challenges of international mail, [29 states](http://votingrightslab.org/2025/10/22/150-years-of-military-and-overseas-voting-now-under-threat/) count military voters’ ballots postmarked by Election Day but received a few days after the election. States such as California, Colorado, Georgia, and South Dakota have also established clear, uniform rules, ensuring that military members and their families can exercise their freedom to vote, even if they were born abroad. Whether serving in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, or Space Force, every service member takes an oath to protect our Constitution. By making it harder for military members and their families to vote, we are undermining the very ideals they’ve sworn to defend. These brave men and women in uniform understand better than anyone that voting isn’t something we can take for granted. We must send a loud and clear message to our elected leaders that protecting this longstanding American tradition isn’t just common sense—it’s their patriotic duty as Americans. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/"},"headline":"Military Voting is an American Tradition. Let’s Keep It That Way","datePublished":"2025-11-26T11:15:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:36:47.304Z","description":"An upcoming SCOTUS case of could make it harder for military members to vote.","url":"https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaffe0e8230c96a42/6998cbfae1ba00b1cb98e27c/SCOTUS-flag.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ellen Gustafson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/ellen-gustafson/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Samantha Tarazi","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/samantha-tarazi/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaffe0e8230c96a42/6998cbfae1ba00b1cb98e27c/SCOTUS-flag.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"American flag flapping boldly in the wind with The Supreme Court in Washington DC, USA.","caption":"American flag flapping boldly in the wind with The Supreme Court in Washington DC, USA.","creditText":"Prasit photo—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7336897/military-voting-is-an-american-tradition/","name":"Military Voting is an American Tradition. Let’s Keep It That Way"}}]}] ```