--- title: Which House Republicans Helped Force a Vote on Epstein Files description: Four GOP lawmakers broke rank with their party to join House Democrats in a discharge petition that forces a floor vote on releasing Epstein files. Here’s who they are and what to know. canonical: https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/ author: Chad de Guzman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-11-13T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:51:13.128Z article:section: Politics og:title: Which House Republicans Helped Force a Vote on Epstein Files og:description: Four GOP lawmakers broke rank with their party to join House Democrats in a discharge petition that forces a floor vote on releasing Epstein files. og:url: https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08cc09ae67df54e5/6998cb9666d4e39130cbd06c/epstein-files-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: House Members Introduce Epstein Files Transparency Act og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Which House Republicans Helped Force a Vote on Epstein Files twitter:description: Four GOP lawmakers broke rank with their party to join House Democrats in a discharge petition that forces a floor vote on releasing Epstein files. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08cc09ae67df54e5/6998cb9666d4e39130cbd06c/epstein-files-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The 4 Republicans Who Joined Democrats to Force a House Vote on Releasing Epstein Files > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=f7b3bde6-79bb-48ff-82db-77b8476f01f8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=f7b3bde6-79bb-48ff-82db-77b8476f01f8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=f7b3bde6-79bb-48ff-82db-77b8476f01f8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Chad de Guzman](https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/)  ## Chad de Guzman Reporter Nov 13, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R, Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D, Calif.) look on during a news conference with alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 3, 2025. U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R, Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D, Calif.) look on during a news conference with alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 3, 2025. Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images  by [Chad de Guzman](https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/)  ## Chad de Guzman Reporter Nov 13, 2025 10:00 AM UTC The reopening of the government is coinciding with the reignition of the controversy around late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his ties to President Donald Trump. Throughout the shutdown, Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson refused to swear in [Adelita Grijalva](https://time.com/7327465/adelita-grijalva-arizona-attorney-general-lawsuit-delayed-swearing-in-history/), an Arizona Democrat who won a special election to succeed her late father in Congress. Grijalva was expected to provide the last signature needed on a discharge petition to force a vote on the release of classified documents related to Epstein and his partner, convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell. Johnson repeatedly denied that the delay in swearing Grijalva in had anything to do with Epstein, but many Republican congressmembers have been reluctant to have to choose between the President, who has made clear he wants the scrutiny to go away, and segments of their base that have for years demanded transparency and ginned up conspiracy theories about Epstein and his influential associates. After Johnson [swore in Grijalva](https://time.com/7333146/adelita-grijalva-johnson-house-swearing-in-epstein-government-shutdown/) on Wednesday, when the House [returned to session](https://time.com/7333457/jeffrey-epstein-files-house-grijalva-johnson/) to pass the funding bill to end the shutdown, Grijalva gave the discharge petition its 218th signature to force a floor vote, which Johnson said will occur next week. Still, the discharge petition would not have passed were it not for four Republicans who added to the Democrats’ 214 votes. But the question remains: will those four remain steadfast or even convince others in their caucus to [join them](https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/12/congress/house-epstein-vote-gop-defections-00649624), or will they succumb to party and [presidential pressure](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/12/politics/trump-administration-meeting-house-effort-epstein-document-release) to vote against the ultimate release of the files? Here’s what to know about the four Republicans who voted in favor of the discharge petition. ## Rep. Thomas Massie (R, Ky.)  Rep. Thomas Massie, (R, Ky.) talks to reporters outside the U.S. Capitol before the House voted on the Senate passed bill to reopen the government on Nov. 12, 2025. Tom Williams—CQ/Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images Leading the charge with Democrats is Thomas Massie, a legislator representing Kentucky and a [frequent intraparty critic of the President](https://time.com/7296692/thomas-massie-trump-mr-no-contrarian-obbb-iran-primary-campaign/). Earlier this year, Trump had said he would back efforts to defeat Massie in his reelection primary next year. In July, Massie, along with Rep. Ro Khanna (D, Calif.), introduced [legislation](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/581/text) that would require the Justice Department to release Epstein-related files within 30 days. Then, in September, Massie filed a discharge petition for the legislation, as Johnson [opted instead to back](https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/03/congress/house-approves-symbolic-epstein-measure-investigation-house-oversight-00541827) a Republican-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee probe into the files—a move widely viewed as symbolic and likely toothless, as the panel could choose not to take any action on the files on the House floor. By Sept. 3, Massie’s discharge petition amassed 214 signatures, including three other Republicans, whom Massie [thanked for signing](https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1963055165499703489). “I’m 99% certain we’ll get 218\. At that point \[Johnson\] may try to change the rules of the House, but chair of Rules Committee says she won’t!” Massie [posted on X](https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1963449352577585211) that day. By Sept. 10, Massie’s discharge petition only needed one more signature, which would come with Grijalva. That month, Massie [told ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/massie-epstein-files-avoid-justice-avoid-embarrassment-powerful/story?id=125336706&utm%5Fsource=chatgpt.com) that those who might be in the Epstein files—regardless of stature—should be held accountable. Massie said that he believes Trump was holding off on releasing the files because “it’s going to be embarrassing to some of the billionaires, some of the donors who are politically connected to his campaign.” Though, he added that some Democratic donors might similarly be affected. The Kentucky representative also previously said that the issue surrounding Epstein is “[not going to go away](https://www.newsweek.com/republican-targeted-trump-says-epstein-issue-not-going-away-2103191?utm%5Fsource=chatgpt.com).”. ## Rep. Lauren Boebert (R, Colo.)  Rep. Lauren Boebert (R, Colo.) leaves the U.S. Capitol on Friday, Sept. 19, 2025. Tom Williams—CQ/Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, a staunch Trump ally, was one of the first people to call for an independent probe into the Administration’s handling of the Epstein files, after the Justice Department announced in July that the Epstein case was [effectively closed](https://time.com/7300378/epstein-client-list-suicide-blackmail-conspiracy-theories-doj-fbi-memo/). “People are frustrated,” she [told News Nation that month](https://www.newsnationnow.com/on-balance-with-leland-vittert/lauren-boebert-epstein-special-counsel-something-needed/). “We want to know if there’s more information.” Boebert signed Massie’s discharge petition on Sept. 2\. In an apparent last-minute bid to block Massie’s petition, Trump Administration officials [met with Boebert](https://time.com/7333455/epstein-trump-boebert-situation-room/) on Wednesday in the White House Situation Room, which Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters reflected the Administration’s commitment to “transparency” on the files. “I want to thank White House officials for meeting with me today,” Boebert [posted on X Wednesday](https://x.com/RepBoebert/status/1988719085056938298). “Together, we remain committed to ensuring transparency for the American people.” ## Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.)  Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.) talks with reporters at the Capitol Hill Club on Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025. Tom Williams—CQ/Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images Marjorie Taylor Greene, a once MAGA diehard who has [increasingly broken with the GOP](https://time.com/7325308/marjorie-taylor-greene-georgia-republican-independence-shutdown-gaza-epstein-trump/), has called for more transparency in the Epstein files release. In July, Greene said that she will sign Massie’s discharge petition, [posting on X](https://x.com/RepMTG/status/1945502464037326863) that she “will never protect pedophiles or the elites and their circles.” In an early [September press conference at the Capitol](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWv46UXyvUc&t=4709s), Greene said that the release of the Epstein files was “not about politics” and instead a “boiling point in American history.” Greene also promised to mention “every damn name” of Epstein’s purported high-powered clients in his underage sex trafficking operation. In the press conference, Greene also urged her fellow Republicans “not to choose just one path for justice and transparency and accountability” but “to choose every path for justice and accountability and transparency.” Greene also said that she pushed back against a White House threat that backing the bill ordering the release of the Epstein files would be seen as a “very hostile act.” Speaking to the [_New York_ _Times_](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/28/us/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-maga-split.html), she recounted: “I told them, ‘You didn’t get me elected. I do not work for you; I work for my district.’” In [a post on X](https://x.com/RepMTG/status/1988802731520221397) after the 218th signature for the petition was secured, Greene said that she “honestly believe\[s\] it’s not only the right thing to do for the victims but it’s also the right thing to do for the country. Americans deserve transparency.” “Next week when everyone is forced to go on record to vote to release the Epstein files, I expect the number of Republicans to be a lot higher that actually vote yes,” Greene added. “But remember the original 4.” ## Rep. Nancy Mace (R, S.C.)  Nancy Mace announces that she will run for South Carolina Governor during a press conference at the Citadel in Charleston, S.C. on Aug. 4, 2025. Tracy Glantz—The State/Tribune News Service/Getty Images Rep. [Nancy Mace](https://time.com/7221379/nancy-mace-political-career-what-to-know/), who is also running for governor in South Carolina, signed the discharge petition in apparent solidarity with sexual abuse and assault survivors. Mace has spoken publicly about her own experiences with abuse and called the discharge petition on Wednesday in a post on X “[deeply personal](https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1988730614951133189).” “I’ve always been an advocate for women and children,” Mace [posted on X in July](https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1944909526215376979). “The Jeffrey Epstein case is no different. I want to see arrests. I want to see any one who raped underage girls in handcuffs and behind bars. No more passes for predators.” Despite Trump’s ties to Epstein, however, Mace continues to identify herself as a strong supporter of the President. She and Trump [reportedly missed out](https://www.axios.com/2025/11/12/epstein-files-trump-massie-discharge-petition-boebert-mace) on each other’s calls in the lead-up to the final discharge petition signature being secured, as rumors circulated online that Mace might remove her signature from the petition, though she ultimately did not. “I will NEVER abandon other survivors,” she posted on X. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/"},"headline":"The 4 Republicans Who Joined Democrats to Force a House Vote on Releasing Epstein Files","datePublished":"2025-11-13T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:51:13.128Z","description":"Four GOP lawmakers broke rank with their party to join House Democrats in a discharge petition that forces a floor vote on releasing Epstein files.","url":"https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/","keywords":["republicans","overnight","News Desk"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08cc09ae67df54e5/6998cb9666d4e39130cbd06c/epstein-files-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Chad de Guzman","jobTitle":"Reporter","url":"https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08cc09ae67df54e5/6998cb9666d4e39130cbd06c/epstein-files-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"House Members Introduce Epstein Files Transparency Act","caption":"U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, Ga.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R, Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D, Calif.) look on during a news conference with alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington,","creditText":"Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/republicans/","name":"republicans"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7333573/epstein-files-discharge-petition-republicans-trump-massie-mace-boebert-greene/","name":"The 4 Republicans Who Joined Democrats to Force a House Vote on Releasing Epstein Files"}}]}] ```