--- title: Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver description: The President’s proposal stops short of ensuring real access to fertility care for millions of Americans, writes Madison Champan. canonical: https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/ author: Madison Chapman article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-10-30T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-11T00:28:37.685Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver og:description: The President’s proposal stops short of ensuring access to fertility care for millions, writes Madison Champan. og:url: https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf356f9d27deedb5c/6998cb1e7323aff9ec2bcfa0/ivf-fertility-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: BIZIVF og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver twitter:description: The President’s proposal stops short of ensuring access to fertility care for millions, writes Madison Champan. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf356f9d27deedb5c/6998cb1e7323aff9ec2bcfa0/ivf-fertility-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEASTime ideas # Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=81cd77c3-546f-4a48-991d-7b2ad585a7c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=81cd77c3-546f-4a48-991d-7b2ad585a7c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=81cd77c3-546f-4a48-991d-7b2ad585a7c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Madison Chapman](https://time.com/author/madison-chapman/) ## Madison Chapman Madison Chapman is a writer and young adult cancer survivor based in Washington, D.C. Oct 30, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  A model of the female reproductive system and an embryo transfer catheter photographed Feb. 29, 2024, in Fountain Valley, CA. A model of the female reproductive system and an embryo transfer catheter photographed Feb. 29, 2024, in Fountain Valley, CA.Jay L. Clendenin—The Washington Post via Getty Images by [Madison Chapman](https://time.com/author/madison-chapman/) ## Madison Chapman Madison Chapman is a writer and young adult cancer survivor based in Washington, D.C. Oct 30, 2025 10:00 AM UTC Just before my 25th birthday, I hooked my feet into stirrups on an icy exam table, ready for a doctor to retrieve my eggs. I’d been diagnosed with [Hodgkin’s lymphoma](https://time.com/6761629/cancer-young-adult-essay/) and learned chemotherapy might make me infertile. Cryopreservation, or egg freezing, was a way to help me become pregnant through IVF if I survived. At the time, nearly seven years ago, my health insurance wouldn’t cover the procedure, despite about [2% of babies in the U.S.](https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/21/health/ivf-egg-freezing-explainer-wellness) being [conceived by IVF](https://archive.cdc.gov/www%5Fcdc%5Fgov/art/state-specific-surveillance/index.html). My family and I managed to cover the more than $12,000 in out-of-pocket costs, but it was a stretch. So I felt hopeful when, on Oct. 16, the President announced his plan to usher in a generation of “[Trump Babies](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/us/politics/trump-ivf-fertility.html)” through proposals to make IVF more accessible. Given his campaign promises to [make the procedure free](https://apnews.com/article/trump-ivf-drug-fertility-2c168dcc0ec7250db16b0a671aea9db8) and require [insurance coverage](https://www.cato.org/commentary/trumps-subsidized-ivf-spells-disaster), I expected a plan I could get behind: IVF access for all through insurance mandates and Medicaid coverage. My hope was quickly quashed. While it’s true the proposal will [lower the cost](https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/white-house-set-announce-proposal-seeking-make-ivf-more-accessible-nyt-reports-2025-10-16/) of key IVF drugs by [up to 84 percent](https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/trump-ivf-fertility-drug-deal-lower-cost-rcna238013)—and encourage employers to offer IVF, it’s an overall letdown. The lack of a public insurance option will exclude millions, given that [in 2024, 17.6% of Americans were on Medicaid](https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/8-americans-lacked-health-insurance-last-year). The plan also doesn’t include the long-promised insurance mandate, which could guarantee IVF access at the federal level for often left-out groups: single people, same-sex couples, and those with chronic diseases that threaten fertility. Without a federal IVF standard, these would-be parents are left to navigate a scattered patchwork of state laws. Far from igniting a baby boom, the White House plan will only slightly decrease costs and fail people who most need IVF to grow their families. **Read more:** [_The Real Way to Boost Birth Rates_](https://time.com/7328698/women-work-career-parenting-jd-vance/) No wonder countries such as [Denmark, Greece, and Spain](https://www.axios.com/2023/07/25/americans-fertility-treatments-abroad) have seen a boost in [fertility tourism](https://www.self.com/story/american-women-are-traveling-abroad-to-get-ivf-treatment) over the last decade. Cost is a key reason. In the United States, one cycle of cryopreservation can cost more than $20,000, while egg storage can exceed $1,000 a year. Then there are the multiple lab visits, the egg retrieval process, the fertilization of oocytes, and the embryo transfer or implantation fees, [none of which will be impacted](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/16/trump-unveils-ivf-policies-but-no-new-funding-or-coverage-requirements-00612266) by reduced drug prices under the White House IVF proposal. Further, many patients require multiple rounds of IVF, hiking up costs. After six cycles, only [two-thirds of women](https://www.pinnaclefertility.com/blog/how-many-ivf-cycles-does-it-take/) become pregnant on average. Meanwhile, [in Barbados](https://www.fertilityclinicsabroad.com/ivf-clinics-abroad/fts-2020/), one of the more popular fertility destinations from the U.S., the total cost for a cycle of IVF without an egg donor ranges from $4,600-$6,400, and the cost of cryopreservation—which put me out $12,000—is just $4,000\. Costs are even lower for IVF in some European destinations. Even including airfare and accommodations, the total comes in at less than an IVF cycle in the U.S. Because most U.S. insurers don’t cover fertility care, many Americans pay the steep costs of IVF out of pocket. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine estimates that [fewer than a quarter of infertile couples have access to treatment](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9351254/). As of April 2025, only 22 states and Washington, D.C., [require insurers to cover fertility care](https://resolve.org/learn/financial-resources/insurance-coverage/)—and just 15 include IVF. Only [eight states require Medicaid](https://resolve.org/learn/financial-resources/insurance-coverage/medicaid-coverage-for-infertility-treatments-and-fertility-preservation/) to cover infertility treatment or cryopreservation. That leaves the unemployed, gig workers, and those on Medicaid or in small businesses [largely unprotected](https://www.fertilityoutloud.com/content-hub/understanding-insurance-coverage-fertility-treatment/). The new federal IVF proposal merely encourages companies to offer [standalone fertility benefits](https://19thnews.org/2025/10/trump-ivf-fertility-costs-insurance/), like [dental or vision coverage](https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5561456-trump-ivf-action-mixed-reactions/), without requiring or [subsidizing](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/16/trump-unveils-ivf-policies-but-no-new-funding-or-coverage-requirements-00612266) them. Unsurprisingly, only a quarter of large employers currently cover IVF, despite infertility affecting [11 percent of women and 9 percent of men](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/us/politics/trump-ivf-fertility.html). Encouragement without incentives is unlikely to change that. Elsewhere, fertility care is far more accessible. About [64 percent of countries offer public insurance or subsidies for IVF](https://www.volusonclub.net/empowered-womens-health/a-global-view-of-ivf-treatment-and-access/). Israel funds it [until a woman has two children](https://www.cato.org/commentary/trumps-subsidized-ivf-spells-disaster); all EU nations now provide [publicly funded options](https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/02/13/how-are-fertility-treatments-handled-around-the-eu); and in Denmark where the laws are liberal and inclusive, around [10 percent of babies are conceived via assisted reproduction](https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/en/publications/taming-technology-assisted-reproduction-in-denmark/). In the U.S., access depends on [where you live and who you are](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028220323979). Definitions of infertility vary, and some states exclude same-sex couples, single people, or those seeking egg freezing for [genetic](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381289/) or [gender-affirming reasons](https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/freezing-eggs-preserving-fertility-for-the-future). People at risk of infertility from diseases like [cancer](https://www.allianceforfertilitypreservation.org/get-informed/faq/) or [polycystic ovarian syndrome](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5715875/) rarely qualify for coverage. Without a federal mandate, these inequities will persist. Abroad, restrictions on IVF access exist but are [generally looser](https://fertilityeurope.eu/atlas2024/), costs are lower, and public coverage is broader. Even Canada, where IVF isn’t universally covered, helps offset costs through its [Medical Expense Tax Credit](https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/sexual-health/financial-support-fertility-treatment-surrogacy.html), expanded in 2022 to include fertility expenses. The White House deserves credit for backing IVF, despite right-wing opposition equating embryo disposal with abortion. But the plan falls short. Expanding access only makes sense alongside broader supports like paid leave, livable wages, and affordable childcare that make parenthood sustainable. Meanwhile, the administration is [cutting research](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/13/abortions-cancer-in-firefighters-and-super-gonorrhea-rfk-jr-s-cuts-halt-data-collection-00284828) and [health subsidies](https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-changes-coming-to-the-aca-medicaid-and-medicare), which will [raise costs](https://www.npr.org/2025/10/16/nx-s1-5561051/health-care-costs-premiums-companies-cost-of-living) and further limit IVF access, especially for Medicaid recipients. If the U.S. truly wants to encourage reproduction, it should follow the lead of countries with more inclusive and affordable fertility policies. Until then, Americans will keep seeking IVF abroad. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/"},"headline":"Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver","datePublished":"2025-10-30T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-11T00:28:37.685Z","description":"The President’s proposal stops short of ensuring real access to fertility care for millions of Americans, writes Madison Champan.","url":"https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf356f9d27deedb5c/6998cb1e7323aff9ec2bcfa0/ivf-fertility-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Madison Chapman","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/madison-chapman/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf356f9d27deedb5c/6998cb1e7323aff9ec2bcfa0/ivf-fertility-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"BIZIVF","caption":"A model of the female reproductive system and an embryo transfer catheter photographed Feb. 29, 2024, in Fountain Valley, CA.","creditText":"Jay L. Clendenin—The Washington Post via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7329085/trump-ivf-babies/","name":"Trump’s IVF Plan Won’t Deliver"}}]}] ```