--- title: How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security description: U.S. adversaries are betting on fracture. But we can be united, write former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson and former Rep. Jane Harman. canonical: https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/ author: Kay Bailey Hutchison article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-09-01T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:34:06.388Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security og:description: U.S. adversaries are betting on fracture. But we can be united, write former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson and former Rep. Jane Harman. og:url: https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd91cca10842282f8/6998c96df1b0828d636f1a48/GettyImages-2160771026.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: NATO Summit In Washington DC Previews og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security twitter:description: U.S. adversaries are betting on fracture. But we can be united, write former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson and former Rep. Jane Harman. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd91cca10842282f8/6998c96df1b0828d636f1a48/GettyImages-2160771026.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEASTime ideas # How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=5c05b3fe-5237-4a07-8e46-bcb0f6a49e37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=5c05b3fe-5237-4a07-8e46-bcb0f6a49e37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=5c05b3fe-5237-4a07-8e46-bcb0f6a49e37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Kay Bailey Hutchison](https://time.com/author/kay-bailey-hutchinson/) and [Jane Harman](https://time.com/author/jane-harman/) Bailey Hutchison is an attorney and former Republican Senator from Texas. She served as U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 2017-2021. Jane Harman is a former Democratic Congresswoman from California. She was president and CEO of the Wilson Center from 2011-2021. Sep 1, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  A view of the Capitol in Washington D.C., on July 9, 2024. A view of the Capitol in Washington D.C., on July 9, 2024.Jakub Porzycki—NurPhoto/Getty Images by [Kay Bailey Hutchison](https://time.com/author/kay-bailey-hutchinson/) and [Jane Harman](https://time.com/author/jane-harman/) Bailey Hutchison is an attorney and former Republican Senator from Texas. She served as U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 2017-2021. Jane Harman is a former Democratic Congresswoman from California. She was president and CEO of the Wilson Center from 2011-2021. Sep 1, 2025 10:00 AM UTC Vladimir Putin continues to run the clock on Ukraine, with no respect for human life, international law, or Russia’s [prior commitments](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/05/we-knew-putin-would-attack-ukraine-back-in-2011-says-bill-clinton) to support Ukraine’s sovereignty. Yet his effort to divide the West is backfiring. The resolve of NATO leadership and the actions of key member countries show that allied unity is not only holding but strengthening. That unity is increasingly visible in the U.S. as well, where bipartisan support for NATO and for pressure on Russia is experiencing a revival. For decades after World War II, Republicans and Democrats shared a basic belief: that American leadership in the world—including strong alliances and sustained military readiness—was essential to our national security and prosperity. Senator Arthur Vandenberg embodied this shift when he abandoned isolationism to support President Harry Truman’s bid to join Western allies in [creating NATO](https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/nato#), to counter the Soviet Union and insure against another world war. The two of us saw a glimpse of that bipartisan unity in the early evening of Sept. 11, 2001, when we joined members of the House and Senate on the steps of the Capitol hours after the deadliest attack in history on American soil. Our spontaneous [chorus of “God Bless America”](https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/2000-/The-singing-of-God-Bless-America-on-September-11-2001/) was more than a moment of mourning—it was a signal to the world that the U.S. would not cower, and that our leaders would stand together. Congress opened for business the next morning, with embers still burning at the Pentagon, determined to respond with resolve. That same bipartisan spirit has anchored U.S. support for NATO through decades of challenges. The alliance grew from 12 founding members to 32, helped end the Cold War, supported democratic transitions in Central and Eastern Europe, and adapted to new threats from terrorism to cyberattacks to great-power rivalry. In more recent years, however, strains were evident. Frustrations over burden-sharing mounted, with Defense Secretaries from Donald Rumsfeld to Robert Gates warning that NATO risked irrelevance if Europe did not invest more in defense. When Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Europe’s calculus changed. NATO allies responded with unprecedented seriousness, [boosting defense budgets](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/defence-numbers/), [reinforcing the eastern flank](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/how-natos-eastern-flank-is-setting-the-standard-for-collective-defense/), and aligning behind Kyiv. What once seemed uncertain is now clear: NATO is not only relevant, it is indispensable. Putin’s bid to divide the U.S. from Europe has instead strengthened the transatlantic bond, leaving him more isolated and exposed. And while President Donald Trump had previously [questioned](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/07/donald-trump-nato-alliance-us-security-support) NATO, he has shown a strong commitment to the alliance ever since the successful June summit where allies agreed to spend 5% of GDP on defense. The recent summits earlier this month underscored this reality. President [Trump’s meeting with Putin in Alaska](https://time.com/7310117/putin-talks-trump-ukraine-takeaways/) drew partisan fire at home, but the criticism obscured a more consequential development. Days later, European leaders convened in Washington to coordinate strategy. With [NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte](https://time.com/7295448/rutte-nato-secretary-general-interview/) playing a pivotal role, the alliance is helping shape the contours of security arrangements [now under discussion](https://www.ft.com/content/66ec25a0-4af8-467f-9fbe-cf42de890a7e)—ensuring they reflect shared values, credible deterrence, and a unified front against Russian aggression. Congress has echoed this recognition. The Graham–Blumenthal bill to [impose sweeping secondary sanctions](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/13/politics/russia-sanctions-bill-trump-senators-bipartisan) on Russia has drawn 85 co-sponsors in the Senate—a rare display of unity. And momentum is building. Just this week, Senator John Thune, the Republican leader, declared that “there should be no doubt about where the Senate stands” on Russia—underscoring that even skeptics of sanctions see the legislation as vital to America’s credibility abroad. Lawmakers on both sides understand what is at stake: Russia’s war threatens not only Ukraine but the international order that has kept Europe stable for nearly 80 years. If Putin prevails, Beijing will draw conclusions about Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and beyond. As China grows more assertive—particularly toward Taiwan—the U.S. must reinforce alliances in Asia, maintain a credible deterrent, and craft economic policies that sustain U.S. competitiveness. These are not partisan preferences. They are national imperatives. At a recent Aspen Strategy Group meeting, where we both participated, a bipartisan group of former officials, scholars, and military leaders discussed how to forge consensus on flashpoints like Taiwan. We agreed: unity must be built before a crisis, not after. Proactive planning, clear messaging, and coordination with allies are essential—and will succeed only if Congress and the White House act together. Rebuilding bipartisan consensus will not be easy. But the recent success around strengthening NATO should give us all optimism. The world is watching. Our adversaries are betting on fracture. But history shows that American leadership is most effective when politics stops at the water’s edge. Senator Vandenberg said that in 1947, when Congress backed the creation of NATO and the Marshall Plan. It remains just as true today. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/"},"headline":"How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security","datePublished":"2025-09-01T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:34:06.388Z","description":"U.S. adversaries are betting on fracture. But we can be united.","url":"https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/","keywords":["politics","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd91cca10842282f8/6998c96df1b0828d636f1a48/GettyImages-2160771026.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kay Bailey Hutchison","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/kay-bailey-hutchinson/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Jane Harman","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/jane-harman/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd91cca10842282f8/6998c96df1b0828d636f1a48/GettyImages-2160771026.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"NATO Summit In Washington DC Previews","caption":"NATO Summit In Washington DC Previews","creditText":"Jakub Porzycki—NurPhoto/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7313324/us-bipartisanship-nato-china/","name":"How to Rebuild Bipartisanship in National Security"}}]}] ```