--- title: Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea description: Seoul's recent overtures to Pyongyang will not work. But renewed U.S. engagement might just, writes Andrei Lankov and Peter Ward. canonical: https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/ author: Andrei Lankov article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-08-21T09:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:33:44.598Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea og:description: Seoul's recent overtures to Pyongyang will not work. But renewed U.S. engagement might just, writes Andrei Lankov and Peter Ward. og:url: https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3c348856b5b674a6/6998c92fd32e93c0facd744a/GettyImages-1152948604.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: TOPSHOT-SKOREA-US-NKOREA-DIPLOMACY og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea twitter:description: Seoul's recent overtures to Pyongyang will not work. But renewed U.S. engagement might just, writes Andrei Lankov and Peter Ward. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3c348856b5b674a6/6998c92fd32e93c0facd744a/GettyImages-1152948604.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2924bf3d-2f6d-4575-9ba9-0238e3b08738&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2924bf3d-2f6d-4575-9ba9-0238e3b08738&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=2924bf3d-2f6d-4575-9ba9-0238e3b08738&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2924bf3d-2f6d-4575-9ba9-0238e3b08738&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Andrei Lankov](https://time.com/author/7311339/) and [Peter Ward](https://time.com/author/peter-ward/) Lankov is a historian specializing in North Korea at Kookmin University, Seoul. Ward is a research fellow at the Sejong Institute, a think-tank in South Korea. Aug 21, 2025 9:00 AM UTC  Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un stand on North Korean soil while walking to South Korea in the Demilitarized Zone on June 30, 2019. Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un stand on North Korean soil while walking to South Korea in the Demilitarized Zone on June 30, 2019. Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images by [Andrei Lankov](https://time.com/author/7311339/) and [Peter Ward](https://time.com/author/peter-ward/) Lankov is a historian specializing in North Korea at Kookmin University, Seoul. Ward is a research fellow at the Sejong Institute, a think-tank in South Korea. Aug 21, 2025 9:00 AM UTC When [South Korean President Lee Jae-myung](https://time.com/7289366/lee-jae-myung-south-korea-president-trump-economy-challenges-interview/) delivered an [Independence Day speech](https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10554719) earlier this month, he paid much attention to North Korea. He announced his intention to [restore a 2018 era military agreement](https://apnews.com/article/south-korea-lee-kim-jong-un-military-agreement-japan-d6d190d7b4cc4d8394bcbd7e057bf990) and reminded his nation that he has taken a [number of steps to reduce tensions](https://time.com/7307476/south-north-korea-loudspeakers-progress-tensions/) with the North, like halting anti-North propaganda balloon launches and loudspeaker broadcasts across the demilitarized border zone. [Kim Jong Un](https://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2017-kim-jong-un-runner-up/) responded this week with a pledge to [rapidly build up](https://www.nbcnews.com/world/north-korea/north-koreas-kim-calls-rapid-nuclear-buildup-us-south-korea-exercises-rcna225762) his country’s nuclear forces. His sister Kim Yo Jong, who is also Pyongyang’s spokesperson-in-chief, then delivered a statement once again [rejecting South Korean overtures](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/20/n-korea-says-s-korea-cannot-be-a-diplomatic-partner-as-us-drills-continue), come as they did alongside Lee’s efforts to maintain the U.S.-South Korea alliance. The siblings [also](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/kim-jong-un-slams-south-korea-us-drills-during-an-inspection-of-his-most-powerful-warship/ar-AA1KLoAE) [condemned](https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/north-korea-south-usa-military-b2810927.html) the South for continuing with annual joint military exercises that [began on Monday](https://www.nbcnews.com/world/south-korea/south-korean-us-militaries-begin-annual-summertime-drills-north-korea-rcna225532). Lee comes from the “progressive” camp, which has historically been more willing to offer Pyongyang concessions and aid. Yet his more conciliatory approach has so far elicited [scorn](https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-08-14/national/northKorea/Kim-Yojong-rejects-Souths-conciliatory-gestures-calls-them-a-shabby-deceptive-farce/2376029) or silence. Alas, that is likely to remain the case. **Read More:** [_The Meaning of Lee Jae-myung’s Election Triumph_](https://time.com/7290682/lee-jae-myung-south-korea-election-win/) The reasons are straightforward: for the time being, the North Korean side has nothing to gain from warmer ties. For decades, Pyongyang regarded South Korea primarily as a source of [billions of dollars](https://www.unikorea.go.kr/eng%5Funikorea/relations/statistics/humanitarian/) in economic support. To put it bluntly, North Korea treated the South as a state-sized ATM—especially when progressive administrations were in power. But North Korea has been subjected to a [very strict U.N. sanctions regime](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-korea-sanctions-un-nuclear-weapons) since 2017\. This U.S.-led effort is aimed at preventing North Korea from financing its nuclear program, and has made large-scale economic cooperation between Seoul and Pyongyang virtually impossible. Judging from the North’s perspective, therefore, improving ties with Seoul serves little purpose: the old ATM is broken. It is true that U.N. sanctions did not ban humanitarian assistance or some cultural activities, but this is not what North Korean leaders want. They see cultural or other non-economic exchanges as harmful to the hermit kingdom, given the [30-fold gap in per capita GDP](https://www.mk.co.kr/en/world/11199632#:~:text=On%20the%2020th%2C%20the%20National,similar%20to%20the%20previous%20year.) between the two Korean states. Awareness of South Korea’s prosperity and freedoms inevitably raises questions about whether the North Korean system is truly superior and whether their leaders are as wise as they claim. Moreover, Pyongyang is not as desperate for South Korean aid as it once was. Arms sales worth an [estimated $20 billion](https://www.nknews.org/2025/04/north-korea-has-earned-estimated-20b-from-military-support-for-russia-report/) and steady [economic support from China](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-north-korea-relationship) have helped cushion its troubles—at least for the time being. Pyongyang would also prefer to not look weak by accepting humanitarian aid it can now do without. What the North wants is money and material assistance, without strings attached and presented as tribute not aid. No doubt, the Lee administration is quite happy to provide such assistance, be it joint industrial or tourist projects like the [Kaesong Industrial Zone](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22011178) pursued in the past. But South Korea is not going to openly violate the U.N. sanctions regime. That is why any serious shift in inter-Korean relations requires the lifting—or at least the meaningful relaxation—of U.N. sanctions. This is a step only the U.S. could engineer, and in practice only Donald Trump might attempt. During his first term, Trump came quite close to forging such a deal with Pyongyang. At the February 2019 U.S.-North Korea summit in Hanoi, the two sides discussed a formula under which North Korea would agree to dismantle its major nuclear facilities. In return, the U.S. was expected to back a revision of U.N. sanctions policy—a move that other members of the Security Council would have been unlikely to oppose once Washington gave its consent. But in the end, the two sides [failed](https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/09/21/north-korea-talks-moon-trump-kim-jong-un/) to agree on the details, and the [Hanoi summit collapsed](https://time.com/5540719/donald-trump-north-korea-summit-watch-live/). It is possible, however, that negotiations will resume shortly; some U.S. officials have recently [dropped hints](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-is-receptive-contacts-with-north-korean-leader-white-house-says-2025-06-11) about the prospects of renewed engagement with Pyongyang, and even Trump himself said a couple of months ago that he had a “[good relationship](https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-still-has-good-relations-with-leader-nuclear-power-north-korea-2025-03-13/)” with Kim Jong Un and hoped to “solve the conflict” with North Korea. If negotiations do begin, there remains a genuine, but limited, chance of success. North Korea will not, under any circumstances, relinquish its [nuclear arsenal](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/21/asia/north-korea-secret-missile-base-china-intl-hnk). Yet from Pyongyang’s perspective, there is a certain logic in pursuing a nuclear arms control agreement (if it comes with the right perks). Such a deal could offer the regime a means of easing its heavy reliance on China and Russia, the only two countries that are willing to ignore the U.N. sanctions regime when dealing with North Korea. The North Korean leadership regards such dependence as burdensome, especially regarding China. In any case, progress in inter-Korean relations ultimately hinges on direct U.S.–North Korea talks. Only if those negotiations succeed will Seoul and Pyongyang be able to move forward. And that remains, at best, a very big if. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/"},"headline":"Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea","datePublished":"2025-08-21T09:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:33:44.598Z","description":"Seoul's recent overtures to Pyongyang will not work. But renewed U.S. engagement might just.","url":"https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/","keywords":["world affairs","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3c348856b5b674a6/6998c92fd32e93c0facd744a/GettyImages-1152948604.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Andrei Lankov","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/7311339/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Peter Ward","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/peter-ward/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3c348856b5b674a6/6998c92fd32e93c0facd744a/GettyImages-1152948604.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"TOPSHOT-SKOREA-US-NKOREA-DIPLOMACY","caption":"TOPSHOT-SKOREA-US-NKOREA-DIPLOMACY","creditText":"Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7311336/trump-north-korea-nuclear-deadlock/","name":"Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea"}}]}] ```