--- title: The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters description: The upcoming summit in Kananaskis, Canada is a valuable diplomatic format in a world riven by division, writes Charles A. Kupchan. canonical: https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/ author: Charles A. Kupchan article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-06-14T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-11T00:57:24.782Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters og:description: Small and informal groupings are becoming the diplomatic vehicles of choice in a polarized world, writes Charles A. Kupchan. og:url: https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt16cab8a462882cd8/6998c77ea97fc03da6a7470a/GettyImages-2216427690.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Finance Ministers And Central Governors' Meeting In Banff og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters twitter:description: Small and informal groupings are becoming the diplomatic vehicles of choice in a polarized world, writes Charles A. Kupchan. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt16cab8a462882cd8/6998c77ea97fc03da6a7470a/GettyImages-2216427690.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9351bcdb-91d2-4a14-8805-d5f54aa65ea5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9351bcdb-91d2-4a14-8805-d5f54aa65ea5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=9351bcdb-91d2-4a14-8805-d5f54aa65ea5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Charles A. Kupchan](https://time.com/author/charles-a-kupchan/) ## Charles A. Kupchan Contributor Charles A. Kupchan is Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Jun 14, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  A logo of the G7 2025 Kananaskis, seen during the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting in Banff, Alberta, Canada, on May 21, 2025. A logo of the G7 2025 Kananaskis, seen during the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting in Banff, Alberta, Canada, on May 21, 2025. Artur Widak—NurPhoto via Getty Images by [Charles A. Kupchan](https://time.com/author/charles-a-kupchan/) ## Charles A. Kupchan Contributor Charles A. Kupchan is Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Jun 14, 2025 10:00 AM UTC It’s easy to dismiss the G-7, a club of wealthy democracies [set up in 1975](https://time.com/7292616/history-50th-g7-summit/) to coordinate trade and global economic policy. [This year's summit](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/what-is-the-g7-1.7556129)—held on June 15-17 in Kananaskis, Canada—comes at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump is upending the global economy with [tariffs](https://time.com/7292207/us-china-trade-war-trump-tariffs-timeline/) and has [repeatedly threatened](https://time.com/7282450/trump-annex-canada-economy-recession-upholding-the-constitution/) to make the host nation America’s “51st state.” The G-7 is also an anachronism. It was set up five decades ago to include the world's largest economies, but today China and India, two economic heavyweights, are not members. The G-7 has simply not kept pace as the global distribution of wealth and power shifts from West to East and North to South. Nonetheless, the upcoming G-7 summit is still a valuable and promising diplomatic format. First, it brings together many of the world’s leading democracies. If the liberal, rules-based international order is to survive and thrive, this collection of advanced democracies will need to play a prominent role. Trump seems determined to bring this order down, but the summit [offers a chance](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2025-06-13/trump-g-7-leaders-to-discuss-trade-russia-ukraine-iran-israel-middle-east) for America’s prized allies to talk him out of that, or at least limit the damage done. Second, the G-7 is small and informal, enabling it to foster sustained dialogue and build consensus. The G-7 in important respects resembles the 19th century Concert of Europe, a steering group of major powers that had no charter or formalized procedures, but relied on ad hoc consultation and coordination to preserve great-power peace over decades. At a time when geopolitical division hamstrings large and formal bodies like the U.N. and World Trade Organization, small and informal contact groups are becoming the diplomatic vehicles of choice. Although a clutch of other countries—including [Brazil](https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/canada-invites-united-arab-emirates-to-g7-summit-brazil-says-carney-invited-to-cop30/article%5Fd60ffd09-aaab-5a6c-a952-68be855e94d3.html), [India](https://www.dw.com/en/modis-g7-visit-can-india-canada-reset-strained-ties/a-72894633), and [Ukraine](https://www.reuters.com/world/ukraines-zelenskiy-attend-g7-hopes-meet-president-trump-2025-06-12/)—are expected to attend the G-7 as guests, the format lends itself to intimate and constructive conversation. When it comes to getting things done, small is beautiful. The world’s wealthiest democracies are not alone in turning to bespoke and informal groupings to conduct diplomacy. Indeed, China and Russia have been leading the effort to form steering groups, such as the [BRICS](https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-brics-group-and-why-it-expanding), to serve as counterweights to the G-7 and other bodies dominated by the West. The BRICS includes not just autocracies like China and Russia, but also developing democracies like Brazil, India, and South Africa. The G-7 and BRICS are suspicious of each other, in a way that splits the major powers into competing diplomatic camps. Yet such division is a huge problem in an interdependent world that faces collective challenges—including climate change, nuclear proliferation, pandemics, and the threats posed by AI. The G-20—which includes democracies and autocracies as well as developed and developing economies from all parts of the world—exhibits the diversity that is needed. But it is also too big and bulky, and its summits produce only anodyne communiques. So what should come next? The way forward is more bespoke groupings like the G-7 that focus on specific challenges. One could focus on ending the war in Ukraine; a second on ending the current war in the Middle East; a third on tackling climate change; and a fourth on the growing threat posed by unregulated AI. Such concerts should include democracies and non-democracies alike, bridging, rather than deeping, ideological and geopolitical divides. These bespoke groupings would not supplant the U.N. and other international bodies. They would backstop them by providing a forum for a sustained dialogue that is hard to come by in big and bureaucratic institutions. And they would tee up decisions that would be implemented in more official settings. It is precisely this function that the G-7 summit should aim to fulfill. At the top of the agenda will be Ukraine and trade. If Trump is to succeed in his effort to end the war in Ukraine, he will need to confront Vladimir Putin with tighter economic sanctions and more weapons for Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky is [hoping for a meeting](https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-zelenskyy-trump-meeting-g7-war-russia-putin-defense/) with Trump in Kananaskis, a conversation that can help set the stage for a successful NATO summit in The Hague later this month, where the big item on the agenda is [defense spending](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crljpwnr220o). On trade, the world is [teetering on the edge of a precipice](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg4v9nr23r7o). A 90-day pause on Trump’s sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs ends on July 8, and some [17 nations](https://www.reuters.com/world/china/bessent-says-us-may-roll-date-forward-some-after-90-day-tariff-pause-ends-2025-06-11/) are still reportedly in trade talks. The summit will give G-7 members—who still account for more than half of global GDP—an opportunity to get Trump to back away from the ledge. The world is at a dangerous inflection point as the demand for global governance increasingly outstrips its supply. The U.N. and other existing institutions have an important role to play—but they are not enough on their own. They need to be complemented by a system of concerts aimed at facilitating compromise, cooperation, and collective action. The G7 is one of those. Let's hope more of them follow. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/"},"headline":"The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters","datePublished":"2025-06-14T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-11T00:57:24.782Z","description":"Small and informal groupings are becoming the diplomatic vehicles of choice in a polarized world.","url":"https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/","keywords":["world affairs","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt16cab8a462882cd8/6998c77ea97fc03da6a7470a/GettyImages-2216427690.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Charles A. Kupchan","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/charles-a-kupchan/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt16cab8a462882cd8/6998c77ea97fc03da6a7470a/GettyImages-2216427690.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Finance Ministers And Central Governors' Meeting In Banff","caption":"Finance Ministers And Central Governors' Meeting In Banff","creditText":"Artur Widak—NurPhoto via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7293958/g7-summit-kananaskis-canada/","name":"The G-7 Is Outdated. But It Still Matters"}}]}] ```