--- title: Why Trump Will Blink First on China description: The U.S. President signalled a potential U-Turn when he said that tariffs will have to "come down substantially," writes Ryan Hass. canonical: https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/ author: Ryan Hass article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-04-25T09:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-11T00:19:18.507Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why Trump Will Blink First on China og:description: The U.S. President signalled a shift when he said that tariffs will have to "come down substantially," writes Ryan Hass. og:url: https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6dc3bef576e5f848/6998c5fe47fe512f4355ba23/GettyImages-2208890785.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: TOPSHOT-US-POLITICS-TRUMP og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Trump Will Blink First on China twitter:description: The U.S. President signalled a shift when he said that tariffs will have to "come down substantially," writes Ryan Hass. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6dc3bef576e5f848/6998c5fe47fe512f4355ba23/GettyImages-2208890785.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Trump Will Blink First on China > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=20c66eeb-2d1a-40f3-8b72-644d53f98d3a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=20c66eeb-2d1a-40f3-8b72-644d53f98d3a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=20c66eeb-2d1a-40f3-8b72-644d53f98d3a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Ryan Hass](https://time.com/author/ryan-hass/) ## Ryan Hass Contributor Contributor Apr 25, 2025 9:00 AM UTC  Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio attend a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House on April 10, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio attend a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House on April 10, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images by [Ryan Hass](https://time.com/author/ryan-hass/) ## Ryan Hass Contributor Contributor Apr 25, 2025 9:00 AM UTC U.S. President Donald Trump will probably blink first. The first sign of that came Tuesday when he said that 145% tariffs on China will “[come down substantially](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/22/business/trump-china-trade-war-reduction-hnk-intl/index.html)” and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicted “[de-escalation](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/22/trump-china-tariffs)” in the _de facto_ trade embargo between the world’s two largest economies. Both sides would certainly benefit from finding agreement. The trade war has [vaporized](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/21/us-stock-market-trump-fed-chair-jerome-powell) [trillions of dollars](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx26v8x24w1o) from the stock market, caused the [dollar to plunge](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/21/us-dollar-falls-to-three-year-low-as-trumps-powell-threats-further-dent-investor-confidence.html), and tipped America’s economy [closer to recession](https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/spotlights/2025/us-and-global-economic-outlook-deteriorates-in-trump-trade-war-imf-says/). Chinese freight ship bookings have also [plummeted](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/16/trade-war-fallout-china-freight-ship-decline-begins-orders-plummet.html) in recent weeks, suggesting downward pressure on China’s export sector, an engine of the country’s economic growth. Yet there are still major obstacles to striking a deal. There is no serious U.S.-China negotiating process underway, and therefore no off-ramp on the immediate horizon. And that is, in part, because Beijing is not in the mood to build one. **Read More:** [_Why China Can't Win a Trade War_](https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/) China’s leaders believe their political system is more unified, hardened, and disciplined than the Trump Administration to withstand a trade war. They [do not face competitive elections](https://freedomhouse.org/country/china) or political blowback from market movements like in the U.S. They also have considerable leeway to shape the public narrative about the trade war through state-controlled media. Moreover, China has tools at hand to hit America’s economy where it hurts, including the withholding of [critical minerals](https://time.com/7273094/trumps-tariffs-may-risk-access-to-this-critical-mineral/) and key inputs to America’s industrial value chains. A prolonged trade war could shudder U.S. factories, cause job losses, and lead to higher inflation and empty store shelves. China’s leaders seem to expect America’s political feedback loop will kick in quicker and sharper for Trump than for Xi Jinping. In other words, Beijing believes time is on its side. That is why China will be cautious about entering into trade negotiations. Since its leaders believe they have leverage and can afford patience, they will not negotiate against themselves. They will wait for Trump to define what is up for negotiation. Trump has insisted that “[the ball is in China’s court](https://www.reuters.com/world/ball-chinas-court-trade-talks-white-house-says-2025-04-15/)” and that it must “[ultimately](https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/22/trump-says-tariffs-china-will-come-down/83218008007/)” make a deal to preserve its access to the U.S. market. The problem for Trump, though, is that virtually nobody in Beijing agrees with this assessment. In Trump, China’s leaders see an improvisational leader who frequently changes his mind and rarely sticks to agreements for long. Given these dynamics, fairly or not, if there is going to be a climb down on the trade war, it will need to come from Trump. It is not going to originate in Beijing. To get to a deal, Trump will need to identify his objectives and then empower his staff to negotiate on his behalf. He will also need to read the room. Beijing craves respect. It will only agree to a deal that it can present at home and abroad as a win for itself, too. During his first term, Trump signed a [U.S.-China “Phase One” trade deal](https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/us-china-trade-deal-would-be-tricky-tenuous-2025-04-23/). As part of the deal, Beijing committed to purchase at least $200 billion in additional U.S. goods and services above 2017 levels. The deal ultimately underperformed; Beijing did not follow through on its purchasing pledges. As such, there will not be U.S. appetite for a do-over of negotiating commitments for future purchases of American goods and services. The challenge, then, is to find an overlap of interests between Washington and Beijing that could allow both sides to justify negotiations. There are a few potential building blocks for such a deal. For example, Beijing has [publicly signaled its intent to boost domestic demand](https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3306705/chinas-premier-cites-profound-changes-urging-boost-domestic-consumption). A tangible and time-bounded effort to deliver on that could be mutually beneficial. Greater domestic demand would spur Chinese growth while reducing export flows to U.S. and global markets. Trump might also be open to negotiating around Chinese investment into the American heartland to boost manufacturing capacity in non-national security sectors. Chinese investments there would allow Trump to claim progress in American re-industrialization, while Xi could tout success in expanding scope for homegrown firms to make profits in the U.S. market. Given the hardening politics in both countries around the trade war, even this modest set of outcomes might seem out of reach. But the alternative would be to let the trade war rumble, and the diplomatic calendar to run its course. Both Trump and Xi will likely attend the APEC leader’s meeting this November in South Korea. That will be the first time and place where they can be expected to be together. A meeting could allow both leaders to set a course for negotiators to follow. The possibility of talks before November is still there. A small exit door remains available for both sides to escape the mounting costs of the trade war. Xi is not going to open that door, though. If anyone is going to kick the door open, it will need to be Trump. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/"},"headline":"Why Trump Will Blink First on China","datePublished":"2025-04-25T09:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-11T00:19:18.507Z","description":"A trade war is injurious to both sides but Beijing is more confident that time is on its side.","url":"https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/","keywords":["world affairs"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6dc3bef576e5f848/6998c5fe47fe512f4355ba23/GettyImages-2208890785.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ryan Hass","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/ryan-hass/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6dc3bef576e5f848/6998c5fe47fe512f4355ba23/GettyImages-2208890785.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"TOPSHOT-US-POLITICS-TRUMP","caption":"TOPSHOT-US-POLITICS-TRUMP","creditText":"Brendan Smialowski—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7279900/trump-xi-us-china-trade-war/","name":"Why Trump Will Blink First on China"}}]}] ```