--- title: The Case for an Allied Space Forces description: It's time for the U.S. to lead a new defense alliance to guarantee a free, open, and peaceful outer space. canonical: https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/ author: Andrew Hanna article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-04-13T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:30:29.400Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Case for a U.S.-Led Military Alliance in Space og:description: An Allied Space Forces could help guarantee a free, open, and peaceful outer space. og:url: https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5b9018338daa5d4a/6998c5cae1ba008fd398d774/GettyImages-1213155434.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: President Trump Signs An Armed Forces Day Proclamation And Participates In U.S. Space Force Flag Presentation og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Case for a U.S.-Led Military Alliance in Space twitter:description: An Allied Space Forces could help guarantee a free, open, and peaceful outer space. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5b9018338daa5d4a/6998c5cae1ba008fd398d774/GettyImages-1213155434.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Case for a U.S.-Led Military Alliance in Space > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c0c43f6a-372a-4967-86d3-aa831eb4aa15&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c0c43f6a-372a-4967-86d3-aa831eb4aa15&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c0c43f6a-372a-4967-86d3-aa831eb4aa15&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c0c43f6a-372a-4967-86d3-aa831eb4aa15&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Andrew Hanna](https://time.com/author/andrew-hanna/) and [Kathleen Curlee](https://time.com/author/kathleen-curlee/) Contributor Contributor Apr 13, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  A newly designed rank insignia in Washington, D.C. on May 15, 2020. A newly designed rank insignia in Washington, D.C. on May 15, 2020. Samuel Corum/Pool—Getty Images by [Andrew Hanna](https://time.com/author/andrew-hanna/) and [Kathleen Curlee](https://time.com/author/kathleen-curlee/) Contributor Contributor Apr 13, 2025 10:00 AM UTC Far out in geosynchronous orbit, a Russian satellite moves through deep space. Cosmos 2553, [nicknamed “Sput-nuke,”](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/12/05/opinion/nuclear-weapons-space.html) is designed to carry a nuclear payload that could render most satellites unusable. Meanwhile, China is pouring [billions of dollars](https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF) into developing advanced space capabilities, including anti-satellite weapons. These weapons, known as ASATs, could change modern life on Earth as we know it—threatening GPS, weather forecasting, geospatial intelligence, and more. Also at stake is the burgeoning [$1.8 trillion space economy](https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/aerospace-and-defense/our-insights/space-the-1-point-8-trillion-dollar-opportunity-for-global-economic-growth) that relies on open and free access to space. The principles of a free, open, and peaceful space are enshrined in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which all major space powers have ratified, including the U.S., Russia, and China. The U.S. had sought to build on that landmark treaty when it launched the Artemis Accords in 2020, which [54 countries](https://www.yahoo.com/news/bangladesh-becomes-54th-nation-join-173506309.html) have so far signed on to. But the refusal of Russia and China to get on board—alongside the [Kremlin’s veto last year](https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15678.doc.htm)of the first ever U.N. Security Council resolution on outer space, which condemned the placing of weapons of mass destruction in orbit—are a sure as sign as any that a new approach is needed. That is why it is time for the U.S. to lead a new military alliance—an Artemis Alliance, or Allied Space Forces—to do exactly that. China’s space ambitions are hegemonic and virtually limitless. “To explore the vast cosmos, develop the space industry, and build China into a space power is our eternal dream,” Xi Jinping said in [China’s most recent space strategy](https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/202201/28/content%5FWS61f35b3dc6d09c94e48a467a.html). According to the Pentagon, Beijing has devoted “[significant resources](https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF)” to all aspects of its space program, including counter-space weapons. Russia, which has been cannibalizing its space program for missile parts, still maintains interests in outer space. But with a test of a space weapon that [endangered its own cosmonauts](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-59299101.amp) onboard the International Space Station in 2021 and the subsequent launch of Cosmos 2553 in 2022, as well as an attack-capable [satellite in the same orbit](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-assesses-russia-launched-space-weapon-near-american-satellite-last-week-2024-05-21/) as a U.S. government satellite in 2024, Moscow appears to have shifted toward an apocalyptic mindset: if it cannot control space, nobody should. The Artemis Alliance should not, of course, replace the Outer Space Treaty. A defense alliance would instead be a coalition of like-minded countries whose goal is to uphold the peaceful use of space. Ultimately, an Artemis Alliance would add [hard power](https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/581/) credibility to the soft power norms and principles shaped by the 1967 accord, essentially giving it “teeth.” The Alliance would seek to deter and defeat offensive space capabilities, condemn any attempts to render space unusable in international fora, and impose tangible violations that include sanctions—from export controls on the low end to military action on the high end. It would consist of the U.S. and friendly spacefaring nations that Washington already has reciprocal defense treaties with, such as Australia, Canada, France, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, and the U.K. The long-term goal would be to expand membership to emerging spacefaring partners that do not yet have reciprocal defense treaties with the U.S., such as India, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Such an alliance would also align with the 2020 [National Space Policy](https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National-Space-Policy.pdf) that the Trump Administration issued in its first term, and which stated that the U.S. shall “strengthen deterrence and assure allies and partners of its commitment to preserving the safety, stability, security, and long-term sustainability of space activities.” An alliance is the most powerful and effective mechanism to ensure the U.S. has the ability to create and shape norms—a mechanism more powerful than treaties. **Read More:** [_Inside Space Force: Here's What the New Agency Does_](https://time.com/5869987/spaceforce/) To be sure, some countries may hesitate to align civilian space activities with a military alliance. For most, space symbolizes bold aspirations of scientific research and exploration—not warfare. There would likely be concerns that joining a military alliance would contradict the spirit of the Outer Space Treaty. Yet the U.S. Navy [justifies](https://www.pacom.mil/Portals/55/Documents/pdf/J06%20TACAID%20-%20FONOPs.pdf?ver=pH6FtE-cpgyhqfBJi2vEKg%3D%3D) its efforts to ensure the free flow of trade under the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Therefore, an Artemis Alliance is justified as a necessary enforcement mechanism. And unlike UNCLOS, the U.S. Senate ratified the Outer Space Treaty, which makes it legally binding in America. The threats today are kinetic and offensive, not just ideological. According to [USSPACECOM](https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/testimony%5Fof%5Fgeneral%5Fstephen%5Fnwhiting.pdf), China is rapidly developing counter-space weapons “like direct-ascent antisatellite missiles, lasers, and jammers” and unveiled in 2024 a “novel microwave weapon that could target satellites.” Meanwhile, Russia has declared military satellites as legitimate targets and already in 2025 used electronic weapons to cause “flight diversions and Global Positioning System inaccuracies.” Ignoring these threats and relying solely on existing norms for protection is not an effective countermeasure. The U.S. and its allies need more than words at this stage. They need the ability to move up the escalation ladder to take defensive military actions on Earth before adversaries take devastating military actions in space. Space is not a luxury—it is a necessity. The Artemis Alliance is the logical next step in securing an open, free, and safe space environment. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/"},"headline":"The Case for a U.S.-Led Military Alliance in Space","datePublished":"2025-04-13T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:30:29.400Z","description":"It's time for the U.S. to lead a new defense alliance to guarantee a free, open, and peaceful outer space.","url":"https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/","keywords":["world affairs"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5b9018338daa5d4a/6998c5cae1ba008fd398d774/GettyImages-1213155434.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Andrew Hanna","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/andrew-hanna/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Kathleen Curlee","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/kathleen-curlee/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5b9018338daa5d4a/6998c5cae1ba008fd398d774/GettyImages-1213155434.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"President Trump Signs An Armed Forces Day Proclamation And Participates In U.S. Space Force Flag Presentation","caption":"President Trump Signs An Armed Forces Day Proclamation And Participates In U.S. Space Force Flag Presentation","creditText":"Samuel Corum/Pool—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7277034/us-allied-space-forces/","name":"The Case for a U.S.-Led Military Alliance in Space"}}]}] ```