--- title: Why China Can't Win a Trade War description: Beijing has once again retaliated against Trump's tariffs, but it has more to lose in the economic fight, writes Bob Davis. canonical: https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/ author: Bob Davis article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-04-12T10:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:03:24.683Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why China Can't Win a Trade War og:description: A trade war hurts America too but China is especially vulnerable, writes Bob Davis. og:url: https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7321320cd59937b/6998c5b3e1ba0025b998d74d/GettyImages-2208377888.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: TOPSHOT-CHINA-US-STOCKS-MARKET-TARIFFS-OPEN og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why China Can't Win a Trade War twitter:description: A trade war hurts America too but China is especially vulnerable, writes Bob Davis. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7321320cd59937b/6998c5b3e1ba0025b998d74d/GettyImages-2208377888.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why China Can't Win a Trade War > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=45ceb52a-7733-43a8-aa23-9367bc74c2c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=45ceb52a-7733-43a8-aa23-9367bc74c2c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=45ceb52a-7733-43a8-aa23-9367bc74c2c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=45ceb52a-7733-43a8-aa23-9367bc74c2c0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) ## Video: China Says "Door Is Open" For U.S. Tariff Talks Based on Mutual Respect [Watch (HLS stream): China Says "Door Is Open" For U.S. Tariff Talks Based on Mutual Respect](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9hwYDLmx.m3u8) (1:36)  _Published 2025-04-10. World markets soared on Thursday, with Japan’s benchmark jumping more than 9%, as investors welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to put his sharp tariff hikes on hold for 90 days, though he excluded China from the reprieve._ by [Bob Davis](https://time.com/author/bob-davis-2/) ## Bob Davis Contributor Contributor Apr 12, 2025 10:00 AM UTC  People walk past a screen showing Chinese stock market movements in Beijing on Apr. 7, 2025\. Asian equities collapsed after China hammered the U.S. with its own hefty tariffs, ramping up a trade war many fear could spark a recession. People walk past a screen showing Chinese stock market movements in Beijing on Apr. 7, 2025\. Asian equities collapsed after China hammered the U.S. with its own hefty tariffs, ramping up a trade war many fear could spark a recession. Wang Zhao—AFP/Getty Images by [Bob Davis](https://time.com/author/bob-davis-2/) ## Bob Davis Contributor Contributor Apr 12, 2025 10:00 AM UTC Does China have some not-so-secret weapons that will help it outlast the U.S. in the [trade war](https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/04/11/business/trump-tariffs-stocks-china)? It might seem so. Chinese leaders remind youth that they should learn to endure hardships—[“eat bitterness,”](https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/08/17/why-are-chinas-young-people-so-disillusioned) as the Chinese say—unlike overweight and lazy Americans. Its autocratic government brooks no dissent so decision-making should be easier than in fractious America and decisions should stick longer. And China has dozens of ways to [make life miserable](https://news.sky.com/story/china-is-now-up-for-the-fight-in-a-trade-war-with-the-us-and-its-not-clear-trump-knows-what-hes-taking-on-13345755) for U.S. companies, who can be relied upon to lobby Washington to back off. But those ideas reflect an outmoded view of China and a fundamental misunderstanding of its economic and political system. Eat bitterness? Sure, in the past when China was far poorer. But it now has the same middle-class ennui as the U.S. and the Communist party’s legitimacy is largely based on an implied contract that it will improve living standards, not set them back. (Oh, and more than half of Chinese are now[ overweight](https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/24/china/china-adult-overweight-intl-hnk/index.html), hardly a sign of asceticism.) As for a dictatorship being able to make decisions at the snap of the fingers? Not really. Beijing has a labyrinth bureaucracy that carefully considers—and reconsiders—options before they go up the chain for decision making. Xi Jinping is the preeminent leader but looks for consensus from top party officials he has put in power. If anything, when it comes to decision-making in the trade war, the U.S. is much closer to one-man rule than China. One reason Donald Trump may [love tariffs](https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250401-tariff-man-trump-s-long-history-with-trade-wars) is that he can apply them, raise them, lower them, or pause them by whim. Congress has [delegated](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/08/politics/tariffs-trump-power-constitution-congress/index.html) its constitutional tariff power to the executive branch and the courts generally defer as well on matters framed as defending national security. Of course, China has many ways it can try to make the U.S. capitulate but all of them have significant drawbacks. It can try to match the U.S. [tariff hikes](https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2019/us-china-trade-war-tariffs-date-chart), as it once again did on Friday, ramping them up to at least 125%, while [calling](https://www.wsj.com/economy/trade/china-raises-tariffs-on-u-s-imports-to-125-as-trade-war-heats-up-371c5723?mod=livecoverage%5Fweb) the “abnormally high numbers” a “joke in the history of the world economy.” Indeed. They are now so high, that they will crash orders and halt trade—although don’t bet that Trump will see it that way. As he told his aides during his first administration, “They’ll run out of [bullets](https://www.amazon.com/Superpower-Showdown-Battle-Between-Threatens-ebook/dp/B07Z3RZ9NY/ref=sr%5F1%5F1?dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.hNnmmNDqVo1pco1cQfotNHaAqQPKf4zObCQhk6L4Mzqiy19lJ-JZt0jaT6bHU6D9DabSD-SwaROfvewkMGr7bcAd-YeswoCMxRWY3tRdW%5F4.r%5FqigNX7cGaLu-sMSBFEOqEt8BP1d%5FFJ2WXNmnrtzFs&dib%5Ftag=se&hvadid=694099099176&hvdev=c&hvexpln=67&hvlocphy=9007538&hvnetw=g&hvocijid=4061227715400578042--&hvqmt=e&hvrand=4061227715400578042&hvtargid=kwd-831965552280&hydadcr=22538%5F13493324&keywords=superpower+showdown&mcid=02c67bf5b8353a1e951b53ace5fa27b8&qid=1744311561&s=books&sr=1-1) first.” Or Beijing could [pressure U.S. companies](https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-trump-tariff-trade-war-response-1ac838b0?st=KdUgn7&reflink=article%5Fgmail%5Fshare), which they are starting to do, with antitrust probes, limits on Hollywood films, and blacklisting some U.S. exporters. But push too hard there and the foreign investment that China depends on for jobs and technology, which has [plunged](https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/China-s-foreign-investment-tanks-99-in-3-years-amid-economic-slowdown) since the pandemic, will evaporate. Then there is China’s vaunted [control](https://www.reuters.com/world/china-hits-back-us-tariffs-with-rare-earth-export-controls-2025-04-04/#:~:text=BEIJING%2FLONDON%2C%20April%204%20%28,a%20range%20of%20consumer%20goods.) over the minerals and so-called rare earths used to make electronics. But U.S. companies generally don’t buy the minerals directly from China. Rather, they are packaged into components sold to U.S. buyers. Should Beijing push too hard, it will incentivize other nations to match Chinese subsidies for mining and processing. **Read More:** [_How Rare Earths Are Playing a Pivotal Role in the U.S.-China Trade War_](https://time.com/7275818/rare-earth-china-tariffs-metals-minerals/) Finally, there are financial weapons. During the last trade war, China [devalued its currency](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/11/trump-tariffs-china-may-not-weaken-yuan-in-trade-war-with-the-us-.html) somewhat to reduce the cost of its U.S. exports, which were hit with tariffs of between 7.5% and 25%. But the Chinese yuan would need to take an enormous hit even to partially offset three-digit tariffs, and that would make imports enormously expensive in China and encourage a massive outflow of capital as ordinary Chinese search for ways to convert their yuan into dollars or euros. Conversely, if China tried to sell off its [horde](https://ticdata.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents/slt%5Ftable5.html) of more than [$760 billion](https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/will-china-trigger-the-nuclear-option-in-tariff-war-19587038.htm) in U.S. Treasury bonds, which would drive up interest rates in the U.S., that would also increase the value of yuan, making Chinese exports even more expensive. Again, that’s the opposite of what China wants. All this isn’t to say that China is stuck and at the mercy of the U.S. The cliché among economists is that a trade war hurts everyone, and that’s true. China may strike out at the U.S. in one of the many ways I listed even though it could hurt Beijing more. Or it can largely sit still and wait for the U.S. president to implode the economy. Tariffs of 125% on the U.S.’s third largest trading partner, which makes everything from Christmas lights to iPhones to industrial components will hike prices so high in the U.S. that it could [throw the country into recession](https://time.com/7275987/trump-tariffs-global-economy-recession-trade-war-asia-world-impacts/). And, as tariffs always do, they will hit the wallets of poorer people more than the wealthy who can afford higher prices. Democrats—and maybe even retailers—will encourage consumers to think of the tariffs as a Trump sales tax. That alone will put pressure on the U.S. to settle, whatever China does. And there is [one more twist](https://time.com/7276293/trump-tariffs-reversal-world-leaders-countries-responses-uncertainty-trade-war/). Because the U.S is now charging at least 125% tariffs on everything from China and only 10% tariffs on goods from everywhere else, there is an enormous incentive for Chinese producers to evade tariffs by shipping goods through a third country. That would sharply reduce the tariff money Trump and other Republicans are counting on to help finance their agenda. Both nations have huge incentives to work out a deal that could at least de-escalate the trade war. China’s Commerce Ministry says it is open to [“dialogue and consultation.”](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tariffs-china-open-to-talks-as-us-pauses-higher-levies-other-countries/) Trump says he wants to discuss a deal with Xi. To get a positive response, Trump is turning to his flattery playbook, calling his Chinese counterpart [“a proud man,”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTP0639RD0c) among other encomiums. Those comments look like a mutual recognition that a trade war of attrition is a loser for both countries. ## Transcript Chiang Kai. Shek. Tong. Tsui. Ping. Chong. Wei Chen. Show. Mao. Mao. Mao. Mao. Mao. Yo, yo. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/"},"headline":"Why China Can't Win a Trade War","datePublished":"2025-04-12T10:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:03:24.683Z","description":"A trade war hurts everyone but China is especially vulnerable.","url":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/","keywords":["world affairs"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7321320cd59937b/6998c5b3e1ba0025b998d74d/GettyImages-2208377888.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bob Davis","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/bob-davis-2/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7321320cd59937b/6998c5b3e1ba0025b998d74d/GettyImages-2208377888.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"TOPSHOT-CHINA-US-STOCKS-MARKET-TARIFFS-OPEN","caption":"TOPSHOT-CHINA-US-STOCKS-MARKET-TARIFFS-OPEN","creditText":"Wang Zhao—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/","name":"Why China Can't Win a Trade War"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"China Says \"Door Is Open\" For U.S. Tariff Talks Based on Mutual Respect","description":"World markets soared on Thursday, with Japan’s benchmark jumping more than 9%, as investors welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to put his sharp tariff hikes on hold for 90 days, though he excluded China from the reprieve.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/9hwYDLmx/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2025-04-10T17:25:27.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9hwYDLmx.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/","duration":"PT1M36S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```