--- title: How the Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappointed description: The heavily redacted files proved disappointing. A GOP Judiciary Committee “rickroll” during the anticipation of the release didn’t make people feel any better. canonical: https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/ author: Chad de Guzman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-02-28T05:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-10T23:52:02.831Z article:section: Politics og:title: How the Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappointed og:description: The heavily redacted files proved disappointing. A GOP Judiciary Committee “rickroll” during the anticipation of the release didn’t make people feel any better. og:url: https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4512e16c4a59ed09/6998c47c47fe51c5c155b7a9/epstein-files-rickroll.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-JUSTICE-EPSTEIN og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How the Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappointed twitter:description: The heavily redacted files proved disappointing. A GOP Judiciary Committee “rickroll” during the anticipation of the release didn’t make people feel any better. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4512e16c4a59ed09/6998c47c47fe51c5c155b7a9/epstein-files-rickroll.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappoint Anticipators. A Republican ‘Rickroll’ Didn’t Help > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=35111c1f-4632-4ec2-98b2-2226498f1c21&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=35111c1f-4632-4ec2-98b2-2226498f1c21&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=35111c1f-4632-4ec2-98b2-2226498f1c21&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Chad de Guzman](https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/)  ## Chad de Guzman Reporter Feb 28, 2025 5:00 AM UTC  People carry binders bearing the Justice Department seal and titled u0022The Epstein Files: Phase 1u0022 outside the White House on Feb. 27, 2025\. u003cbru003e People carry binders bearing the Justice Department seal and titled u0022The Epstein Files: Phase 1u0022 outside the White House on Feb. 27, 2025\. u003cbru003e Saul Loeb—AFP/Getty Images  by [Chad de Guzman](https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/)  ## Chad de Guzman Reporter Feb 28, 2025 5:00 AM UTC Members of Congress and far-right influencers had been clamoring for the release of previously classified documents related to the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein since President Donald Trump, who had [promised](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/09/03/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-release-list-us-election/?utm%5Fsource=chatgpt.com) during his campaign that he would do so, took office. Attorney General Pam Bondi [announced](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-pam-bondi-says-some-epstein-files-coming-thursday-its-pretty-sick) on Wednesday that Thursday would be the day they’d been waiting for. But after a group of far-right influencers were [handed physical binders at the White House](https://time.com/7262542/pam-bondi-jeffrey-epstein-files/)—a photo-op-style move some observers called a “[managed disclosure](https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1895205588658995274)” and others described as “[tasteless](https://x.com/billybinion/status/1895205363630199090)”—people online waited for hours to get access to a digital version of the release. So when the X account for the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee posted: “BREAKING: EPSTEIN FILES RELEASED,” followed by a link, users hoped it would lead them to the anticipated cache of documents. Instead, what clickers got was [the music video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ) for Rick Astley’s 1987 hit song “Never Gonna Give You Up.” The prank—a nearly two-decade-old bait-and-switch meme known as “[rickrolling](https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/rickrolling/)”—enraged observers and has since been taken down. “Disgusting behavior,” [posted](https://x.com/realannapaulina/status/1895295874911424745) Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R., Fla.), who chairs a task force focused on transparency and declassifying federal materials. “The amount of people hurt by Epstein is not a joke. Whoever posted this is going to get fired.” “Just a stunning lack of judgment by the people responsible for this account,” said conservative political commentator [Matt Walsh](https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1895230816227348723) on X. “Little kids were raped and this is how the GOP acts. These people are as guilty as the Epstein client list. This is why it’s taken this long to get any progress,” another user [posted](https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1895221313947738295). TIME has reached out to the GOP-led [House Judiciary Committee](https://judiciary.house.gov/contact) for comment. The Justice Department eventually did [publish the documents](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-pamela-bondi-releases-first-phase-declassified-epstein-files,) online, but it only led to more disappointment when reviewers [found that the release was heavily redacted](https://time.com/7262542/pam-bondi-jeffrey-epstein-files/) and included information that was already previously made available. **Read More:** [_The Biggest Names from Jeffrey Epstein’s Unsealed Court Documents_](https://time.com/6552063/jeffrey-epsteins-unsealed-court-documents/) Responding to the lack of new information, Luna, the congresswoman, [posted on X](https://x.com/RepLuna/status/1895188683688681725): “THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!” Far-right activist Laura Loomer also [raged](https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1895274155546943948), “We were all lied to today,” and she [called on](https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1895290137283858765) Bondi to resign, labeling her a “total liar.” Loomer said in [another post:](https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1895253868684157237) “This is absurd. Everyone is laughing at the admin today.” Former MLB pitcher John Rocker, also a conservative, said [on X](https://x.com/itsJohnRocker/status/1895246569735365081): “THE EPSTEIN FILE RELEASE TODAY WAS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.” On the other side of the political spectrum, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) referred to the redactions in a [post on X](https://x.com/RepSwalwell/status/1895236162882806215). “You were promised the full Epstein files. You got this,” he said, with a picture of a page of black lines. Other Republicans had more positive things to say. Rep. [Nancy Mace](https://time.com/7221379/nancy-mace-political-career-what-to-know/) (R., S.C.) thanked the Trump Administration for releasing the documents and “shedding light on this darkness,” adding [on X](https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1895261209055678514): “Our hearts ache for the victims of this crime, and we stand alongside them in their quest for justice.” **Read More:** [_How Longtime Epstein Watchers Reacted to the Release of the ‘Epstein Files’_](https://time.com/7262717/jeffrey-epstein-list-files-disappoint-julie-brown-jacob-shamsian-reactions/) Before the release of the documents, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.) [said on X](https://x.com/RepMTG/status/1895197032522125619) that she was “proud” of the work of Bondi and [FBI Director Kash Patel](https://time.com/7259969/kash-patel-fbi-director-confirmation-senate-hearing-trump-pick/). “AG Bondi will release the documents only protecting victim’s identity which is the right thing to do,” Greene said earlier Wednesday. “AG Bondi is releasing today everything she currently has. AG Bondi and FBI Director Patel are doing a great job!” Bondi [on Thursday claimed](https://time.com/7262542/pam-bondi-jeffrey-epstein-files/) the FBI was withholding records she’d requested and instructed Patel to investigate as well as ordered the “full and complete” files to be delivered to her by Friday. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/"},"headline":"Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappoint Anticipators. A Republican ‘Rickroll’ Didn’t Help","datePublished":"2025-02-28T05:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-10T23:52:02.831Z","description":"The heavily redacted files proved disappointing. A GOP Judiciary Committee “rickroll” during the anticipation of the release didn’t make people feel any better.","url":"https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/","keywords":["Trump Administration","overnight","News Desk"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4512e16c4a59ed09/6998c47c47fe51c5c155b7a9/epstein-files-rickroll.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Chad de Guzman","jobTitle":"Reporter","url":"https://time.com/author/chad-de-guzman/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4512e16c4a59ed09/6998c47c47fe51c5c155b7a9/epstein-files-rickroll.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-JUSTICE-EPSTEIN","caption":"US-POLITICS-JUSTICE-EPSTEIN","creditText":"Saul Loeb—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/trump-administration/","name":"Trump Administration"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7262658/epstein-files-released-reactions-disappointment-republicans-rickroll/","name":"Released ‘Epstein Files’ Disappoint Anticipators. A Republican ‘Rickroll’ Didn’t Help"}}]}] ```