--- title: How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco description: His plan to "permanently" resettle Palestinians outside the Strip has sent shockwaves around the world. canonical: https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/ author: Kenneth Roth article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2025-02-08T12:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-10T23:39:26.085Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco og:description: His plan to "permanently" resettle Palestinians outside the Strip has sent shockwaves around the world. og:url: https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt81dc7815290ce86e/6998b32e7323af3bc92ba56c/GettyImages-2197159129.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Benjamin-Netanyahu-visits-with-President-Trump-at-White-House og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco twitter:description: His plan to "permanently" resettle Palestinians outside the Strip has sent shockwaves around the world. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt81dc7815290ce86e/6998b32e7323af3bc92ba56c/GettyImages-2197159129.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=0379ed65-732b-4303-b669-74ebccaa4589&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=0379ed65-732b-4303-b669-74ebccaa4589&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=0379ed65-732b-4303-b669-74ebccaa4589&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Kenneth Roth](https://time.com/author/kenneth-roth/) ## Kenneth Roth Kenneth Roth is a visiting professor at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs. Feb 8, 2025 12:00 PM UTC  U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. on February 4, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. on February 4, 2025. Bryan Dozier—AFP/Getty Images by [Kenneth Roth](https://time.com/author/kenneth-roth/) ## Kenneth Roth Kenneth Roth is a visiting professor at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs. Feb 8, 2025 12:00 PM UTC The lasting significance of [Donald Trump’s](https://time.com/7200212/person-of-the-year-2024-donald-trump/) stunning [plan](https://time.com/7212848/trump-gaza-own/) to “take over” the Gaza Strip and “permanently” resettle the roughly 2 million Palestinians who live there may be that it legitimized one option that, as a possible solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, had been widely considered beyond the pale. Trump’s plan would “solve” the Palestinian problem by physically removing Palestinians. It is one way to understand the devastation that Israel has caused in Gaza—to [render it uninhabitable](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20415675) so that Palestinians would leave “[voluntarily](https://www.timesofisrael.com/smotrich-doubles-down-on-resettlement-of-gazans-rejecting-us-criticism/),” as the far-right Israeli minister Bezalel Smotrich, himself a settler, put it. But it would also be a [war crime](https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/feb/05/trump-gaza-plan-could-amount-to-war-crime-say-experts) and a crime against humanity, and surely invite [further charges](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2p19l24g2o) by the International Criminal Court, as well as global condemnation. A week ago, the idea was considered anathema. That’s where Trump stepped in, at his Feb. 4 news conference beside [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu](https://time.com/7008717/benjamin-netanyahu-interview/). Secretary of State Marco Rubio later tried to walk back the President’s comments, suggesting that Trump meant the displacement to be only [temporary](https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/02/05/world/israel-gaza-netanyahu-trump?campaign%5Fid=60&emc=edit%5Fna%5F20250205&instance%5Fid=146747&nl=breaking-news®i%5Fid=13104264&segment%5Fid=190228&user%5Fid=f9f32c671f3e231b94498e6795451442) while Gaza is rebuilt. But that is not what Trump [said](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/04/trump-netanyahu-meeting/), which is why a smiling Netanyahu responded, “it’s worth paying attention to.” Since its founding in 1948, Israel has treated the forced deportation of Palestinians as permanent—which is why they refer to their expulsion from the land that became the Jewish state as the [_Nakba_](https://time.com/6978612/nakba-day-history/), or “catastrophe.” If Trump seems either oblivious or unbothered by the implications of his plan, the world was not. Outrage at the proposal has been widespread, and the two governments that Trump envisions accepting the Palestinian refugees, Egypt and Jordan, want [nothing](https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-trump-gaza-egypt-jordan-c6bedbd6ca0702c22b80f1bf07cd4326) to do with it. Indeed, it quickly became clear that Trump was largely speaking off the top of his head [without any serious planning](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/us/politics/trump-gaza-takeover.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare). Still, the damage had been done. Trump seemed to be embracing a blatantly illegal scheme. Yet he could make amends by pushing the Israeli government toward a more just and sustainable peace. Palestinians must hope that Trump is willing to change course. There have long been four options for ending the century-old conflict. The first would be to recognize the “[one-state reality](https://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/israel-palestine-one-state-solution)” that Israel and Palestine have become because of extensive Jewish settlements. An occupying power’s transfer of its population to occupied territory is a [war crime](https://apnews.com/article/israel-settlements-west-bank-un-war-crime-13041a65d126db5d96d234ad214ded15), in [violation](https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-49) of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, but successive Israeli governments have ignored that prohibition, and the U.S. government has kept [billions of dollars](https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-charts) of aid flowing anyway. The settlement project [was pursued in part](https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/09/1141572) to render a Palestinian state impossible. The view from a West Bank hilltop is illustrative. The proliferation of Israeli settlements, outposts, and bypass roads have left the West Bank a Swiss cheese of Palestinian enclaves. In 2017 B’Tselem, Israel’s leading human rights group, counted [165](https://www.btselem.org/settlements) disconnected “islands,” leaving no prospect of a viable contiguous state. The option of a single state would recognize that reality. It would abandon the goal of a Palestinian state but insist that all residents between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River be given [equal rights](https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/shifting-the-paradigm-the-one-state-solution-as-a-path-to-peace/) in the overarching state. But Israeli governments of all stripes have opposed a single state because roughly the [same](https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution) number of Jews and Palestinians live in these lands, and the government wants to maintain a substantial Jewish majority. Netanyahu prefers the status quo, which is the second option. Since the [Oslo Accords](https://history.state.gov/milestones/1993-2000/oslo) of 1993, each Israeli government has claimed to be open to negotiating about a Palestinian state. But that is a fiction, an excuse to stall, as settlements [continue to expand](https://apnews.com/a-look-at-how-settlements-have-grown-in-the-west-bank-over-the-years-0000019079d8d0f6a3da79dcbd0a0000). After more than five decades of occupation and three decades of a supposed “peace process,” it is no longer tenable to regard Israel’s occupation as merely temporary. The “peace process” is moribund. Every serious human rights organization that has examined that occupation has determined it is [apartheid](https://apnews.com/article/middle-east-jerusalem-israel-race-and-ethnicity-racial-injustice-83b44a2f6b2b3581d857f57fb6960115)—a regime for the Jewish population to dominate and repress the Palestinian one. The situation might have been defended for a short time pending the establishment of a Palestinian state, but there is no state on the horizon. That is why there is growing [recognition](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/11/israel-palestine-apartheid-israel-scholars/) that the status quo is intolerable. Forced mass expulsion is the third option, [promoted](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/06/israel-tells-army-to-prepare-plan-for-palestinians-to-voluntarily-leave-gaza) by the Israeli far-right. It would avoid the obligation of granting everyone equal rights in a single state and the opprobrium of the current apartheid. It is the option that Trump shamefully embraced at the news conference, but the President could redeem himself by moving on to the fourth option—a two-state solution, an Israeli and Palestinian state sitting side by side. Netanyahu has [devoted his political life](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/world/middleeast/netanyahu-biden-israel-palestinian-state.html) to avoiding that option. So long as he had the backing of the Republican Party, he felt secure in his intransigence. But if Trump were to endorse it, Netanyahu would suddenly find himself isolated. Why would Trump do that? Because he sees himself as a master dealmaker and wants to negotiate a separate deal, between Israel and Saudi Arabia, one that would cement a regional alliance against Iran. The Saudi government has made clear that the [price](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/04/world/middleeast/trump-gaza-take-over-reactions.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare) of normalizing relations with Israel is a Palestinian state. Trump prides himself as a disruptor, a leader who doesn’t accept things just because they have long been that way. Rather than urge a reprehensible war crime as the solution to the Gaza conflict, he could be a more constructive disruptor if he were to [pivot](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/06/us/politics/trump-gaza-two-state.html) and insist, despite Netanyahu’s protests, on a Palestinian state. We know Trump is capable of pressuring Netanyahu. He was [instrumental](https://time.com/7207325/gaza-ceasefire-trump-biden/) in making the current [ceasefire](https://time.com/7206982/israel-hamas-ceasefire-draft-deal-terms-tensions-explainer/) in Gaza come about. Far more intense pressure will be needed to secure a Palestinian state, but the reward would be far greater as well. And Trump would indeed enshrine himself in history as a deal maker par excellence. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/"},"headline":"How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco","datePublished":"2025-02-08T12:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-10T23:39:26.085Z","description":"His plan to \"permanently\" resettle Palestinians outside the Strip has sent shockwaves around the world.","url":"https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/","keywords":["Israel-Hamas War","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt81dc7815290ce86e/6998b32e7323af3bc92ba56c/GettyImages-2197159129.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kenneth Roth","jobTitle":"Kenneth Roth is a visiting professor at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs.","url":"https://time.com/author/kenneth-roth/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt81dc7815290ce86e/6998b32e7323af3bc92ba56c/GettyImages-2197159129.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Benjamin-Netanyahu-visits-with-President-Trump-at-White-House","caption":"Benjamin-Netanyahu-visits-with-President-Trump-at-White-House","creditText":"Bryan Dozier—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/israel-hamas-war/","name":"Israel-Hamas War"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7214028/how-trump-can-redeem-his-gaza-fiasco/","name":"How Trump Can Redeem His Gaza Fiasco"}}]}] ```