--- title: University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves description: It's a strange moment to degrade the job of university presidents by imposing a cloak of silence on them, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. canonical: https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/ author: Jeffrey Sonnenfeld article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-10-19T13:41:02.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T18:26:40.212Z article:section: Ideas og:title: University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves og:description: "It's a strange moment to degrade the job of university presidents by imposing a cloak of silence on them." og:url: https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3ea50ea334e739c1/698a89f6c9e941cdf9122919/GettyImages-1246620390.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 8192 og:image:height: 4608 og:image:alt: The University Of Chicago og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves twitter:description: "It's a strange moment to degrade the job of university presidents by imposing a cloak of silence on them." twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3ea50ea334e739c1/698a89f6c9e941cdf9122919/GettyImages-1246620390.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e23f7e1d-45ac-4af8-9bc0-e9c86b514c37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e23f7e1d-45ac-4af8-9bc0-e9c86b514c37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=e23f7e1d-45ac-4af8-9bc0-e9c86b514c37&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Jeffrey Sonnenfeld](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/) ## Jeffrey Sonnenfeld Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is the Lester Crown Professor of Leadership Practice at the Yale School of Management. Oct 19, 2024 1:41 PM UTC  The University of Chicago's Saieh Hall for Economics is pictured on Oct. 18, 2022. The University of Chicago's Saieh Hall for Economics is pictured on Oct. 18, 2022. Beata Zawrzel—Getty Images by [Jeffrey Sonnenfeld](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/) ## Jeffrey Sonnenfeld Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is the Lester Crown Professor of Leadership Practice at the Yale School of Management. Oct 19, 2024 1:41 PM UTC It seems like a strange moment to degrade the job of college or university presidents by imposing a cloak of silence on them when leaders of corporations and other institutions are called upon to engage in public discourse. I created and run the nation’s first school for college and university presidents with roughly 100 participants a year for over ten years and find they value this part of their job, even if it is not easy. In a misguided effort to lower the temperature of conflict on campuses and save university presidents from being a punching bag for every corner of society, more than [20 schools have adopted institutional neutrality](https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/11/college-neutrality-policies-free-speech-00183079) rules since last year’s Oct. 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli response. Colleges and universities around the country are reconsidering their neutrality policies in the wake of such positions adopted by the University of Virginia, the University of Wisconsin, the University of Southern California, Harvard, Stanford, and many others. Schools are balancing, on the one hand, whether they put student rights or voices at risk when they take sides on controversial issues or whether they have a moral obligation to address societal wrongs. Speaking in favor of neutrality, Daniel Diermeier, the chancellor of Vanderbilt University, said, “The problem with universities taking official positions is that they lay down a party line; it creates a chilling effect.” Speaking for avoid neutrality, Wesleyan President Michael Roth said, “Deans and presidents should speak, so people agree with them, argue with them, and participate in a conversation.” The University of Chicago’s heralded 1967 _Kalven Report on Institutional Neutrality_ is used increasingly as a shield to justify school silence, saying that institutional neutrality is vital to assure the university’s mission as a forum for diverse thought. Current University of Chicago president Paul Alvisatos said that, “Oftentimes, when universities do take positions, it’s because it reflects a consensus, but it doesn’t recognize that there are many examples in history where what was considered to be conventional wisdom; later on, we found those who had dissenting views actually had a very strong point.” There are three issues missed by this debate. First, each university now virtuously waving around their purity in compliance with the _Kalven Report_, including [Chicago](https://esl.uchicago.edu/2020/09/02/the-elis-response-to-recent-social-unrest-in-the-u-s/) and [Vanderbilt](https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2020/05/31/wente-0531-racial-injustice/), have paradoxically taken recent political stances on societal issues that they found acceptable, such as the excessive force police used in the brutal murder of George Floyd. In fact [these schools](https://time.com/6339107/university-leaders-voices-israel-hamas-war/) have often spoken out on other examples of racial bias, disability barriers, immigration hostility, anti-Chinese bias, and gender bias. Thus, their support of the Kalven doctrine of silence and neutrality seems paradoxical. Second, the oft-cited, but little read, _Kalven Report_ actually encouraged institutional voice to address situations which “threaten the very mission of the university and its values of free inquiry.” Wouldn’t racism, antisemitism, trust in democracy, and violence targeting communities speak to such values? Third, the president’s voice is not the same thing as a school-wide doctrine. By silencing leaders, schools are denying the vital duties of executive leadership long identified by scholars and practitioners alike. The Berkeley organizational sociologist Phillip Selnick pointed out in his classic [_Leadership and Administration_](https://www.ucpress.edu/books/leadership-in-administration/paper) that a voice expressed on societal issues moves a university leader from operational supervision and administrative management to executive leadership. It is this very external voice that the leader provides the responsive adaption to changing social needs. The [Edelman Trust Barometer](https://www.edelman.com/trust/trust-barometer) found that chief executive voices are now pillars of trust in society—creating standards that can be the subject of further debate. University presidents are CEOs and have always been critical voices in society and their constituencies are no more diverse than those of corporations, trade unions, and professional associations. Since the 1960s, college presidents such as Notre Dame’s [Theodore Hesburgh](https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19620209,00.html), Yale’s [Kingman Brewster](https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19670623,00.html) and Berkeley’s [Clark Kerr](https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19601017,00.html) have made an impact on the discourse surrounding global. They did not survey their boards or alumni for consensus before speaking out in favor of the Civil Rights Act or against the Vietnam War. When the CEOs of Merck and Walmart promptly quit Donald Trump’s business advisory council in 2017 over his remarks after the white nationalism violence in Charlottesville, they sparked a stampede of exits. Similarly, the founders of The Home Depot supported opposite presidential candidates openly while in office just as the current president and the current chairman of Blackstone Group support rival presidential candidates. They do not guide their political positions through board votes or shareholder referendums. The interpretation spreading virally across college campuses confuses individual voice with institutional proclamations. They also avoid the “slippery slope” presumption that this must address every societal issue, instead practicing a form of triage priorities as we would find in a hospital ER. As Alexis de Tocqueville pointed out in 1844, the voice of leaders in civil society help certify truth, and creates priceless “[social capital](https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01314708/document)” or community trust. If college presidents get a pass, then why shouldn’t all institutional leaders in democratic society shirk their duties? ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/"},"headline":"University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves","datePublished":"2024-10-19T13:41:02.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T18:26:40.212Z","description":"It's a strange moment to degrade the job of university presidents by imposing a cloak of silence on them, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld.","url":"https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/","keywords":["Education"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3ea50ea334e739c1/698a89f6c9e941cdf9122919/GettyImages-1246620390.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Sonnenfeld","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3ea50ea334e739c1/698a89f6c9e941cdf9122919/GettyImages-1246620390.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The University Of Chicago","caption":"The University Of Chicago","creditText":"Beata Zawrzel—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/education/","name":"Education"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7095165/university-presidents-should-not-silence-themselves/","name":"University Presidents Should Not Silence Themselves"}}]}] ```