--- title: Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology description: ‘A more specialized approach is needed to address the complex health needs of women throughout their lives,’ writes Dr. Elizabeth Poynor. canonical: https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-10-03T14:37:28.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T18:23:08.192Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology og:description: A more specialized approach is needed to address the complex health needs of women throughout their lives. writes Dr. Elizabeth Poynor. og:url: https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt79f26b72bcaea1ef/698a5e68b21a9c661050ad50/obgyn-health_8e83dd.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: obgyn-health og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology twitter:description: A more specialized approach is needed to address the complex health needs of women throughout their lives. writes Dr. Elizabeth Poynor. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt79f26b72bcaea1ef/698a5e68b21a9c661050ad50/obgyn-health_8e83dd.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6f33b72b-00e7-4f28-80c3-f2c8b06464b2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6f33b72b-00e7-4f28-80c3-f2c8b06464b2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=6f33b72b-00e7-4f28-80c3-f2c8b06464b2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Dr. Elizabeth Poynor](https://time.com/author/dr-elizabeth-poynor/) ## Dr. Elizabeth Poynor Oct 3, 2024 2:37 PM UTC  Close-up of female doctor in white coat presenting information from digital tablet to pregnant woman Close-up of female doctor in white coat presenting information from digital tablet to pregnant woman Getty Images by [Dr. Elizabeth Poynor](https://time.com/author/dr-elizabeth-poynor/) ## Dr. Elizabeth Poynor Oct 3, 2024 2:37 PM UTC What we’ve come to recognize as the modern OB-GYN specialty first emerged in the early 20th century when obstetrics and gynecology—separate and distinct fields until that time—were combined to offer comprehensive care throughout women's reproductive years. Today, many women indeed rely on their OB-GYNs not just for reproductive health, but as primary care providers for everything from family planning to cancer screening and menopause management. While the merger of obstetrics and gynecology seems logical, the union has led to ["bikini medicine,"](https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2017/05/15/15/women-and-cv-disease-beyond-the-bikini) a remarkably short-sighted approach that reduces women's health to their reproductive organs while short-changing other vital systems like the heart, brain, and gut. This narrow focus has had far-reaching consequences for women's overall health and the medical profession's approach to treating women. In fact, it has become increasingly clear that a more holistic, specialized approach is needed to address the complex health needs of women throughout their lives. This realization has sparked a long-standing debate within the OB-GYN community about separating gynecology from obstetrics—a move I, a women’s health expert, wholeheartedly support. The split would foster subspecialty development, research, and innovation in these historically underexplored areas while giving young doctors the opportunity to specialize in one or the other. Gynecology focuses on the health of the female reproductive system—including the uterus, ovaries and their hormone production, fallopian tubes, and vagina—encompassing everything from routine exams to the diagnosis and treatment of complex disorders. Obstetrics covers the care given to the mother and fetus during pregnancy and delivery. A combined OB-GYN practice skews care toward reproduction and neglects many crucial aspects of gynecology to the great detriment of women’s health. Women are up to 30% more likely to be misdiagnosed for major illnesses like cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. This stems from a traditionally male-centric focus in medical research, leaving the unique ways these diseases manifest in women largely overlooked. Cardiovascular disease is a prime example, where women remain [underrepresented](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666638/) in clinical cardiovascular trials, making it difficult to fully appreciate sex differences in novel medical therapies, devices, or other interventions. As a result, women also experience more years of poor health compared to men. Heart disease, for instance, is the leading cause of death in women, yet women are [seven times more likely](https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.117.031650) to be misdiagnosed and sent home from the ER during a heart attack. And let’s face it: not all women are interested in reproduction. According to a 2021 [Pew Research Center survey](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/19/growing-share-of-childless-adults-in-u-s-dont-expect-to-ever-have-children/), adult men and women alike who are not already parents say they are unlikely to ever have children, citing reasons ranging from simply not wanting to have kids to concerns about climate change and the environment. The rapid pace of medical advancement further justifies dividing gynecology and obstetrics. [Medical knowledge now doubles every 73 days](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116346/) and new treatments take [17 years to reach clinical practice](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241518/). Both fields have grown too complex for our outdated training model. We're only now grasping how profoundly ovarian hormones influence a woman's physiology throughout her life, not just during reproduction. It's no wonder conditions like menopause remain misunderstood and too often overlooked. My own experience underscores the challenge. At 43, I was blindsided by sudden anxiety and low-grade depression. Sure, I was working seven days a week with a two-year-old, but this was more than working-mom fatigue. As a confident surgeon and businesswoman, I was suddenly gripped by fear and uncertainty. With regular periods, I dismissed hormones—like most doctors in the 1990s—and turned to the medical literature, which pointed to depression. It was my mother, with no medical background whatsoever, who suggested early menopause changes or perimenopause—something I hadn't even considered. She was right. _Given all my training and years as a practicing gynecologic oncologist and surgeon, how could I have missed the signs_, I thought to myself. If I'm being honest, I simply wasn't well-versed in menopausal care then. Mismanaged menopause costs U.S. women [$1.8 billion annually in lost work](https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/pb-assets/Health%20Advance/journals/jmcp/JMCP4097%5Fproof.pdf), lack of hormone support, and missed prevention of cardiometabolic disorders. Yet nearly two decades after my misdiagnosis, most young physicians still receive only a handful of lectures on menopause during their four-year OB-GYN training. The problem extends far beyond menopause as well. Women with autoimmune disorders, which are [significantly more common in women](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32542149/), often face delayed diagnosis and treatment due to lack of specialized knowledge. Mental health issues in women, particularly those tied to hormonal changes, are frequently misunderstood or dismissed. Even osteoporosis, a major concern for postmenopausal women, is an area where many OB-GYNs lack comprehensive training. We need to train dedicated women's health specialists—not just reproductive experts. This would revolutionize the care women receive and dramatically improve outcomes. Beyond the economic losses attributed to mismanaged menopause, consider the productivity losses from undiagnosed autoimmune disorders, the healthcare costs of preventable osteoporotic fractures, and the human cost of misdiagnosed heart disease in women. By creating true women's health specialists, we can potentially mitigate preventable deaths and recoup billions in healthcare costs and lost productivity. **_Read More:_**[_Why Maternity Care Is Underpaid_](https://time.com/6972880/maternity-ward-closures-us/) Proponents argue integrated OB-GYNs should remain primary care providers for women, given [nationwide shortages](https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/state-of-primary-care-workforce-2023.pdf). However, OB-GYNs often lack comprehensive training in neurology, cardiovascular, and metabolic health—critical for life-long, sex-specific care. This reliance may actually harm women's overall health. Splitting obstetrics and gynecology will allow practitioners to stay more current and proficient in their specific areas, following the precedent set by other medical subspecialties. After World War II, advancements in medical knowledge and technology led to the development of distinct surgical fields and focused residency and fellowship programs. As medical science evolves, so too should the training and structure of OB-GYN. Untethering these specialties would align with the broader trend toward increased specialization in medicine, leading to the development of a well-trained, true women’s health specialist—the 21st-century gynecologist. Training programs should create separate tracks for obstetrics and gynecology, and professional organizations like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists should develop new standards. Policymakers must support this shift with funding and legislation to better address the unique needs of women's health care. Women deserve better than “bikini medicine.” Separating these fields can usher in a new era of women's healthcare—one that truly addresses the complex, interconnected nature of women's health. Today’s gynecologists would be true women's health specialists. Because the cost of inaction is too high. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/"},"headline":"Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology","datePublished":"2024-10-03T14:37:28.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T18:23:08.192Z","description":"\"A more specialized approach is needed to address the complex health needs of women throughout their lives,\" writes Dr. Elizabeth Poynor.","url":"https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/","keywords":["health","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt79f26b72bcaea1ef/698a5e68b21a9c661050ad50/obgyn-health_8e83dd.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Dr. Elizabeth Poynor","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/dr-elizabeth-poynor/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt79f26b72bcaea1ef/698a5e68b21a9c661050ad50/obgyn-health_8e83dd.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"obgyn-health","caption":"","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7031874/uncoupling-obstetrics-gynecology-essay/","name":"Why It’s Time to Uncouple Obstetrics and Gynecology"}}]}] ```