--- title: How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late description: The time bomb that is AI isn't as hard to stop as many think, while we better understand its civilizational risks. canonical: https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/ author: Otto Barten article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-05-16T15:22:12.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:53:21.296Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late og:description: The time bomb that is AI isn't as hard to stop as many think, while we better understand its civilizational risks. og:url: https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6bcee65fbdf2b50e/698a56e709208f253b41d27d/GettyImages-1469884525.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Demonstrator holding "No AI" placard og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late twitter:description: The time bomb that is AI isn't as hard to stop as many think, while we better understand its civilizational risks. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6bcee65fbdf2b50e/698a56e709208f253b41d27d/GettyImages-1469884525.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eaa68d1-4b4b-4c51-9b49-ac014b4334c6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eaa68d1-4b4b-4c51-9b49-ac014b4334c6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4eaa68d1-4b4b-4c51-9b49-ac014b4334c6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eaa68d1-4b4b-4c51-9b49-ac014b4334c6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Otto Barten](https://time.com/author/otto-barten/) ## Otto Barten May 16, 2024 3:22 PM UTC  Demonstrator holding "No AI" placard Demonstrator holding "No AI" placard Getty Images by [Otto Barten](https://time.com/author/otto-barten/) ## Otto Barten May 16, 2024 3:22 PM UTC Only 16 months have passed, but the release of ChatGPT back in November 2022 feels already like ancient AI history. [Hundreds](https://qz.com/google-spend-100-billion-ai-development-deepmind-ceo-1851412787) of [billions](https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/20/saudi-arabia-in-talks-with-andreessen-horowitz-to-create-ai-fund.html) of dollars, both public and private, are pouring into AI. Thousands of AI-powered products have been created, including the new [GPT-4o](https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/13/openai-launches-new-ai-model-and-desktop-version-of-chatgpt.html) just this week. Everyone from students to scientists now use these large language models. Our world, and in particular the world of AI, has decidedly changed. But the real prize of human-level AI—or [artificial general intelligence (AGI)](https://time.com/6271657/a-to-z-of-artificial-intelligence/)—has yet to be achieved. Such a breakthrough would mean an AI that [can carry out](https://time.com/6338489/ai-work-jobs/) most economically productive work, engage with others, do science, build and maintain social networks, conduct politics, and carry out modern warfare. The main constraint for all these tasks today is cognition. Removing this constraint would be world-changing. Yet many across the globe’s leading AI labs [believe](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-dario-amodei.html) this technology could be a reality before the end of this decade. That could be an enormous boon for humanity. But AI could also be extremely dangerous, especially if we cannot control it. Uncontrolled AI could [hack](https://www.techspot.com/news/102701-gpt-4-can-exploit-zero-day-security-vulnerabilities.html) its way into online systems that power so much of the world, and use them to achieve its goals. It could gain access to our social media accounts and create tailor-made manipulations for large numbers of people. Even worse, military personnel in charge of nuclear weapons could be manipulated by an AI to share their credentials, posing a huge threat to humanity. It would be a constructive step to make it as hard as possible for any of that to happen by strengthening the world’s defenses against adverse online actors. But when AI can convince humans, which it is [already better at](https://www.newscientist.com/article/2424856-ai-chatbots-beat-humans-at-persuading-their-opponents-in-debates/) than we are, there is no known defense. For these reasons, many AI safety researchers at AI labs such as OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic, and at safety-minded nonprofits, have given up on trying to limit the actions future AI can do. They are instead focusing on [creating](https://openai.com/superalignment) “aligned” or inherently safe AI. Aligned AI might get powerful enough to be able to exterminate humanity, but it should not _want_ to do this. There are big question marks about aligned AI. First, the technical part of alignment is an unsolved scientific problem. Recently, some of the best researchers working on aligning superhuman AI [left OpenAI](https://www.businessinsider.com/jan-leike-ilya-sutskever-resignations-superalignment-openai-superintelligence-safe-humanity-2024-5?international=true&r=US&IR=T) in dissatisfaction, a move that does not inspire confidence. Second, it is unclear what a superintelligent AI would be aligned to. If it was an academic value system, such as utilitarianism, we might quickly find out that most humans’ values actually do not match these [aloof ideas](https://whatweowethefuture.com/), after which the unstoppable superintelligence could go on to act against most people’s will forever. If the alignment was to people’s actual intentions, we would need some way to aggregate these very different intentions. While idealistic solutions such as a U.N. council or AI-powered [decision aggregation algorithms](https://twitter.com/GoogleDeepMind/status/1598293523862032385) are in the realm of possibility, there is a worry that superintelligence’s absolute power would be concentrated in the hands of very few politicians or CEOs. This would of course be unacceptable for—and a direct danger to—all other human beings. **Read More:** [_The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down_](https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/) ## Dismantling the time bomb If we cannot find a way to at the very least keep humanity safe from extinction, and preferably also from an alignment dystopia, AI that could become uncontrollable must not be created in the first place. This solution, postponing human-level or superintelligent AI, for as long as we haven’t solved safety concerns, has the downside that AI’s grand promises—ranging from curing disease to creating massive economic growth—will need to wait. [Pausing AI](https://time.com/6295879/ai-pause-is-humanitys-best-bet-for-preventing-extinction/) might seem like a radical idea to some, but it will be necessary if AI continues to improve without us reaching a satisfactory alignment plan. When AI’s capabilities reach near-takeover levels, the only realistic option is that labs are firmly required by governments to pause development. Doing otherwise would be suicidal. And pausing AI may not be as difficult as some make it out to be. At the moment, only a relatively small number of large companies have the means to perform leading training runs, meaning enforcement of a pause is mostly limited by political will, at least in the short run. In the longer term, however, hardware and algorithmic improvement mean a pause may be seen as difficult to enforce. Enforcement between countries would be required, for example with a treaty, as would enforcement within countries, with steps like stringent hardware controls. In the meantime, scientists need to better understand the risks. Although there is [widely-shared academic concern](https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk), no consensus exists yet. Scientists should formalize their points of agreement, and show where and why their views deviate, in the new [International Scientific Report on Advanced AI Safety](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-scientific-report-on-advanced-ai-safety-expert-advisory-panel-and-principles-and-procedures), which should develop into an “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for AI risks.” Leading scientific journals should open up further to existential risk research, even if it seems speculative. The future does not provide data points, but looking ahead is as important for AI as it is for climate change. For their part, governments have an enormous part to play in how AI unfolds. This starts with officially acknowledging AI’s existential risk, as has already been done by the [U.S](https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-vice-president-harris-call-action-threats-ai-2023-11-01/)., [U.K](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/25/no-10-acknowledges-existential-risk-ai-first-time-rishi-sunak)., and [E.U](https://twitter.com/EU%5FCommission/status/1702295053668946148)., and setting up [AI safety institutes](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute). Governments should also draft plans for what to do in the most important, thinkable scenarios, as well as how to deal with AGI’s many non-existential issues such as mass unemployment, runaway inequality, and energy consumption. Governments should make their AGI strategies publicly available, allowing scientific, industry, and public evaluation. It is great progress that major AI countries are constructively discussing common policy at biannual AI safety summits, including one [in Seoul](https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-republic-of-korea-to-build-on-legacy-of-bletchley-park) from May 21 to 22\. This process, however, needs to be guarded and expanded. Working on a shared ground truth on AI’s existential risks and voicing shared concern with all 28 invited nations would already be major progress in that direction. Beyond that, relatively easy measures need to be agreed upon, such as creating licensing regimes, model evaluations, tracking AI hardware, expanding liability for AI labs, and excluding copyrighted content from training. An [international AI agency](https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2023/04/18/the-world-needs-an-international-agency-for-artificial-intelligence-say-two-ai-experts) needs to be set up to guard execution. It is fundamentally difficult to predict scientific progress. Still, superhuman AI will likely impact our civilization more than anything else this century. Simply waiting for the time bomb to explode is not a feasible strategy. Let us use the time we have as wisely as possible. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/"},"headline":"How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late","datePublished":"2024-05-16T15:22:12.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:53:21.296Z","description":"The time bomb that is AI isn't as hard to stop as many think, while we better understand its civilizational risks.","url":"https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/","keywords":["Technology","Tech","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6bcee65fbdf2b50e/698a56e709208f253b41d27d/GettyImages-1469884525.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Otto Barten","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/otto-barten/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6bcee65fbdf2b50e/698a56e709208f253b41d27d/GettyImages-1469884525.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Demonstrator holding \"No AI\" placard","caption":"Demonstrator holding \"No AI\" placard","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6978790/how-to-pause-artificial-intelligence/","name":"How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late"}}]}] ```