--- title: Why CEOs Are Not Warming To Donald Trump In 2024 description: The narrative that CEOs “are softening towards Trump” is fast becoming a fact-free echo chamber, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. canonical: https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/ author: Jeffrey Sonnenfeld article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-02-07T20:01:29.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:52:38.949Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Column: It's Misguided to Say That CEOS Are Warming to Trump og:description: The narrative that CEOs “are softening towards Trump” is becoming a fact-free echo chamber, says Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. og:url: https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc0df1283d43605a5/698a4851b21a9c7b1f50878f/GettyImages-1924981694.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Closing Arguments Delivered In Trump's Civil Fraud Trial In NYC og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Column: It's Misguided to Say That CEOS Are Warming to Trump twitter:description: The narrative that CEOs “are softening towards Trump” is becoming a fact-free echo chamber, says Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc0df1283d43605a5/698a4851b21a9c7b1f50878f/GettyImages-1924981694.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # It's Misguided to Say That CEOS Are Warming to Trump. Here's Why > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7be96fdd-ad2c-4485-af50-9515f8c566bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7be96fdd-ad2c-4485-af50-9515f8c566bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=7be96fdd-ad2c-4485-af50-9515f8c566bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7be96fdd-ad2c-4485-af50-9515f8c566bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Jeffrey Sonnenfeld](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/) ## Jeffrey Sonnenfeld Feb 7, 2024 8:01 PM UTC  The notion that CEOs “are softening towards" Donald Trump, pictured here in Jan. 2024, is not an accurate representation of what's happening in the business world, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. The notion that CEOs “are softening towards" Donald Trump, pictured here in Jan. 2024, is not an accurate representation of what's happening in the business world, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. Michael M. Santiago—Getty Images by [Jeffrey Sonnenfeld](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/) ## Jeffrey Sonnenfeld Feb 7, 2024 8:01 PM UTC The narrative that the business community is hedging their bets and that CEOs “[are softening towards Donald Trump](https://abcnews.go.com/Business/top-ceos-opposed-trumps-2020-election-lies-now/story?id=106772856)” is escalating and fast becoming a fact-free echo chamber of unsupported pronouncements. Some commentators extrapolated too much from JPMorgan CEO [Jamie Dimon’s quip at Davos](https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/17/business/jamie-dimon-trump-maga/index.html) that “Trump was right about some issues.” Such anodyne remarks could even be shared by President Biden regarding Middle East challenges and the Mexican border. These words do not indicate that the [business community widely expects Trump to beat Biden](https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/18/davos-us-executives-see-a-trump-victory-in-2024.html) or that it is already focused on cozying up to Trump once more. Some have [implied](https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/18/davos-us-executives-see-a-trump-victory-in-2024.html) that Dimon has reversed course and that he speaks for all CEOs. Neither part of that presumption is accurate. In reality, Dimon avoids such public posturing, preferring to guide win/win solutions backstage. He never endorsed Trump, nor did he ever publicly condemn him—even after the [collapse](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-dissolves-business-advisory-councils-after-ceos-depart-n793216) of Trump’s business advisory councils in August 2017, triggered by the [exits of Merck’s Kenneth C. Frazier](https://fortune.com/2017/08/15/merck-ceo-ken-frazier/), Disney’s Bob Iger, and Unilever’s Paul Polman, among others horrified by Trump’s kind words to the [white nationalists at a Charlottesville rally.](https://time.com/charlottesville-white-nationalist-rally-clashes/) Dozens of CEOs [pulled out of White House initiatives](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/16/donald-trump-advisory-councils-disbanded-ceos-charlottesville) at that time—but Dimon never spoke or acted. Even when people inferred five years ago that he criticized Trump, Dimon [immediately apologized](https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/jp-morgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-apologizes-for-saying-he-could-beat-trump-in-election-1027530104) for anyone drawing that conclusion. The hunches that CEOs are enthusiastic for Trump’s return are not based upon any stated first-hand endorsements from CEOs. I have worked closely with the nation’s top 1000 CEOs for over 40 years. Trump support has [plummeted to virtually zero](https://www.marketwatch.com/story/not-one-s-p-500-ceo-is-donating-to-donald-trump-2642604b) among major CEOs and they largely want nothing to do with him now. At the same time, there is no incentive for them to condemn him in the absence of any current abuse of power, but they did not hesitate to do so before and, I feel sure, will not hesitate to speak out again should he act up. I have known Trump personally for 20 years and was among the [first to criticize him](https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB107818352467243459) in the media over his popular TV show _The Apprentice_ and among the [first, in print](https://fortune.com/2015/09/16/trump-president-interview/), to take his presidential candidacy [seriously in 2015](https://fortune.com/2016/07/19/power-sheet-the-man-who-predicted-a-trump-presidential-run/). He is not friendly with many major business leaders, and few saw him as a genuine peer—since he had not ever run a major global public company. Plus, they found his conduct so abhorrent that when I brought him to a large CEO program at New York’s Waldorf Astoria in 2006, many of the biggest names on the guest list walked out in protest. As the timeless adage goes, just “follow the money” to see how unenthusiastic CEOs are for Trump. Most CEOs are still Republican—between 60 and 70 [percent in every decade since the 1980s](https://time.com/6261170/big-business-fell-out-love-with-gop/) and even before then; and it is hardly surprising that _Fortune_ 100 CEOs have traditionally favored Republicans in their political donations, especially in presidential elections. To break it down: [42 of the _Fortune_ 100 CEOs](https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/1434-top-ceos-give-10-times-more-to-mccain-than-to-obama/) contributed to George W. Bush in 2004, [29 to](https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/1434-top-ceos-give-10-times-more-to-mccain-than-to-obama/) John McCain in 2008, [and 28 ](https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fortune-100-ceos-back-republican-donald-trump-1474671842)to Mitt Romney in 2012\. But not a [single _Fortune_ 100 CEO](https://www.marketwatch.com/story/not-one-s-p-500-ceo-is-donating-to-donald-trump-2642604b) has contributed to Trump so far in the 2024 election cycle, just like how [no CEO donated](https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fortune-100-ceos-back-republican-donald-trump-1474671842) a single penny to Trump in 2016\. In 2020, only [two _Fortune_ 100 CEOs](https://www.wsj.com/articles/few-fortune-100-ceos-donate-to-biden-trump-11604059201) donated to Trump, a remarkably weak showing for an incumbent U.S. President.  Courtesy of Jeffrey Sonnenfeld The money trail, or lack thereof, speaks to the frayed ties between Trump and the business world. Whatever personal ties remained between Trump and the business community despite the chaos of his first term were [firmly broken](https://time.com/6111845/woke-big-business-dumps-trump/) in the days after the 2020 election, when CEOs collectively came out in [strong opposition](https://time.com/6111845/woke-big-business-dumps-trump/) to Trump’s election denialism. As soon as Trump claimed election fraud from the lectern of the White House two days after the vote, my phone began buzzing with messages from leading CEOs who could not believe what they were witnessing. With formal organizations such as the Business Roundtable unable to act quickly enough, I was asked to assemble a meeting of 100 top CEOs by Zoom for 7 a.m. the following morning, which [catalyzed](https://time.com/6111845/woke-big-business-dumps-trump/) the release of a highly-publicized statement from these CEOs merely hours afterward, re-affirming Biden’s victory and the importance of a peaceful transfer of power. The same exercise repeated itself in the days following the[ Jan. 6 insurrection ](https://time.com/6137604/history-insurrection-jan-6/)and storming of the Capitol, with CEOs pledging a [moratorium on campaign donations](https://fortune.com/2022/02/15/political-donations-corporate-congressional-fundraising-election-objectors-jan-6-republicans-gop/) to election objectors in Congress, a moratorium which they [largely upheld](https://chiefexecutive.net/ceo-voices-facts-vs-fantasy/), with the most prominent election objectors now totally dependent on individual, not corporate, contributions. The stark lack of enthusiasm from CEOs for Trump is also because the business community has already learned its lesson from 2017, when the initial goodwill of CEOs rushing to join new Trump advisory panels and aligning themselves with the new Administration after his election quickly fizzled amid realizations of the perils of being too close to Trump. This was spurred by substantive policy disputes over trade, tariffs, and immigration, alongside issues of moral leadership ranging from Charlottesville to racial justice. Representatives from the nation’s major aerospace companies, automakers, pharma companies, and others complained to me during the entirety of Trump’s tenure over his dysfunctional antics trying to [pit rival firms against](https://chiefexecutive.net/how-business-leaders-can-alter-trumps-trade-war/) each other in WWE-style slapdowns; General Motors vs. Ford, Lockheed Martin vs. Boeing, Pfizer vs. Merck, etc. CEOs are not political partisans and need to forge constructive relations with leaders across parties. I suspect none of them will endorse Trump in the abstract, nor will they preempt the electorate and condemn him. However, out of patriotism, moral values, and enlightened self-interest, they will likely act when they see autocratic power abuses and assaults upon the national character, should Trump create another catastrophic moment which tears at the fabric of American society. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/"},"headline":"It's Misguided to Say That CEOS Are Warming to Trump. Here's Why","datePublished":"2024-02-07T20:01:29.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:52:38.949Z","description":"The narrative that CEOs “are softening towards Trump” is fast becoming a fact-free echo chamber, writes Jeffrey Sonnenfeld.","url":"https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/","keywords":["Donald Trump","News desk edits"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc0df1283d43605a5/698a4851b21a9c7b1f50878f/GettyImages-1924981694.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Sonnenfeld","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-sonnenfeld/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc0df1283d43605a5/698a4851b21a9c7b1f50878f/GettyImages-1924981694.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Closing Arguments Delivered In Trump's Civil Fraud Trial In NYC","caption":"Closing Arguments Delivered In Trump's Civil Fraud Trial In NYC","creditText":"Michael M. Santiago—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/donald-trump/","name":"Donald Trump"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6692523/ceos-business-world-donald-trump-2024/","name":"It's Misguided to Say That CEOS Are Warming to Trump. Here's Why"}}]}] ```