--- title: Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick description: For women, being more disappointing could be a lifesaver, writes Maytal Eyal. canonical: https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/ author: Maytal Eyal article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-10-03T11:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:03:32.812Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick og:description: For women, being more disappointing could be a lifesaver, writes Maytal Eyal. og:url: https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt506d037266ca3486/698a40c622fb8533b1e2f1b6/anna_no.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: anna_no og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick twitter:description: For women, being more disappointing could be a lifesaver, writes Maytal Eyal. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt506d037266ca3486/698a40c622fb8533b1e2f1b6/anna_no.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 --- # Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e25e590c-bdb1-4cb2-aea2-414f40f1c756&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e25e590c-bdb1-4cb2-aea2-414f40f1c756&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=e25e590c-bdb1-4cb2-aea2-414f40f1c756&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Therapists Raise Red Flags About Using 'Therapy Speak' Online [Watch (HLS stream): Therapists Raise Red Flags About Using 'Therapy Speak' Online](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/oxvh4VUE.m3u8) (4:07)  _Published 2023-08-24. The classic vision of therapy revolved around a person on a couch, supine, tapping into their deepest and darkest hopes and fears. A modern-day remix might look like this: a person still on a couch, but at home, scrolling through a constantly refreshing selection of mental-health content on social-media platforms like TikTok and Instagram._ Oct 3, 2023 11:00 AM UTC  Illustration by Anna Parini for TIME by [Maytal Eyal](https://time.com/author/maytal-eyal/) ## Maytal Eyal Oct 3, 2023 11:00 AM UTC “Be more disappointing” is not a piece of advice most people would pay money to hear, but in my therapy office, it’s often the most valuable guidance I can give. My clients are mostly women, and nearly all of them struggle with a fear of disappointing others. Our culture rewards women for being perpetually pleasant, self-sacrificing, and emotionally in control, and it can feel counterintuitive for my clients to say “no”—or firmly assert their wants and needs. But my work is about helping them realize that their health might literally depend on it. Today, women account for almost[ 80% of autoimmune disease](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292717/#:~:text=Eighty%20percent%20of%20all%20individuals,sex%20chromosomes%20and%20hormonal%20changes.) cases. They are at a higher risk of suffering from[ chronic pain](https://www.iasp-pain.org/advocacy/global-year/pain-in-women/#:~:text=Female%20Pain%20Issues,-Pain%20conditions%20affecting&text=Research%20has%20shown%20that%20women,longer%20lasting%20pain%20than%20men.),[ insomnia](https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/29/1/85/2708069?login=false),[ fibromyalgia](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425926/),[ long COVID](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs%5Fpress%5Freleases/2022/20220622.htm),[ irritable bowel syndrome](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175559/), and[ migraines](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704513/), and are twice as likely as men to[ die after a heart attack](https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-women-are-more-likely-to-die-after-a-heart-attack#Heart-attack-symptoms-in-women). Women experience[ depression](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478054/),[ anxiety](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3135672/), and[ PTSD](https://www.nami.org/Blogs/NAMI-Blog/October-2019/PTSD-is-More-Likely-in-Women-Than-Men) at twice the rate of men, and face a ninefold higher prevalence of[ anorexia](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30593698/#:~:text=Anorexia%20nervosa%20%28AN%29%20occurs%20nine,with%20anthropometric%20and%20metabolic%20traits.), the[ deadliest](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-new-brain/201103/the-deadliest-disorder-0) mental health disorder. Why is it that women are falling ill to these diseases at a rate so much higher than men? Such jarring disparities cannot be accounted for by genetic and hormonal factors alone; psychosocial factors play an important role as well. Specifically, it seems that the very virtues our culture rewards in women—agreeability, extreme selflessness, and suppression of anger—may predispose us to chronic illness and disease. **_Read More:_**[_The Case for Mediocrity_](https://time.com/6314076/case-for-mediocrity/) ### More From TIME In the late 1980s, Harvard-trained psychologist Dana Jack identified a recurring theme among female patients suffering from depression: a tendency to self-silence,[ defined](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8fc0e564aec17bf8b705635a057f40b7b8505f2a) as “the propensity to engage in compulsive caretaking, pleasing the other, and inhibition of self-expression in relationships in an attempt to achieve intimacy and meet relational needs.” Through [longitudinal research](https://blog.oup.com/2010/03/silencing-the-self/), Jack found that this learned behavior, strongly rooted in gender norms, was linked to an increased risk of depression. Since then, considerable evidence has revealed that female self-silencing isn’t just tied to psychological issues like depression and[ eating disorders](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247456/), but also to physical illness. For instance, in March of 2022 a team of researchers at the University of Pittsburgh[ discovered](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887577/) that women of color who strongly agreed with statements like “I rarely express my anger to those close to me,” were 70% more likely to experience increased carotid atherosclerosis, a cardiovascular plaque associated with higher risk of heart attack.[ Other studies](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020764018814271) have connected self-silencing to irritable bowel syndrome, HIV, chronic fatigue syndrome, and cancer among women. Most jarringly, women’s self-silencing has also been linked to higher risk of premature death. In one[ study](https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Y39MCAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA399&ots=I5TNawDl1c&sig=PeEfN939i55wkneI%5FJ6YSTb6KbI#v=onepage&q&f=false), researchers followed nearly 4,000 people in Framingham, Massachusetts over 10 years. They found that women who didn’t express themselves when they had fights with their spouses were four times more likely to die than those who did.[ ](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939772/)This was true even when factors such as age, blood pressure, smoking, and levels of cholesterol were taken into account. When women push their feelings down and cast their needs aside, their health suffers. But it can be difficult for women to do otherwise in a culture that celebrates these self-silencing practices. While young women are praised for “being chill,” moms are revered for being painstakingly altruistic to the point of self-abnegation. These unspoken standards establish a vicious cycle. For many women, it feels easier—beneficial, even—to silence their needs at the expense of their own health, rather than swim against the prevailing cultural current. In his best-selling book,[ _The Myth of Normal_](https://drgabormate.com/book/the-myth-of-normal/), physician and author Gabor Mate writes that many of our society’s most “normalized ways of being”—the qualities we regard as “admirable strengths rather than potential liabilities”—are, in fact, incredibly toxic. “That ‘not listening to self’ in order to prioritize others’ needs is a significant source of the health-impairing roles women assume,” Mate explains. “It is among the medically overlooked but pernicious ways in which our society’s ‘normal’ imposes a major health cost on women.” It seems that the virtues of womanhood are not really virtuous after all; instead, they are wreaking havoc on our bodies and our health. And the way they often do so is through these seemingly “normal,” daily experiences that slowly, over time, chip away at our vitality and erode our well-being. My clients tell me things like, “I don’t deserve to put my needs first. I’m not the breadwinner,” or “I said ‘yes,’ even though I didn’t want to.” In their gradual attempt to be what society considers “good,” they run the risk of compromising their health. As a psychologist, it can sometimes feel challenging to help my clients take back their emotional and physical health when they are contending against a complex cultural system that is reinforcing them to do the opposite. However, I have found that there are some tangible changes that really do, in practice, make a difference. It can be paradigm shifting to understand that behind every emotion exists a need. Anger, for example, can signify the desire to change our current circumstances. Rather than women treating our emotions as inconvenient, bodily malfunctions best to be muted and ignored, we can teach ourselves to view them as windows of insight. Instead of casting away our anger, a valuable question we can ask ourselves in moments of frustration is: what am I needing right now? Another practice, closely related, is boundary setting. For women, who have been unconsciously taught to view our likability as our greatest asset, boundary setting can often feel counterintuitive. Many of us fear that if we honestly communicate our needs and limitations, this will threaten our relationships. But it’s the contrary that’s true: when we set heathy boundaries (rather than toxic ones that can lead to [radical individualism](https://time.com/6271915/self-love-loneliness/)) our relationships actually become stronger and healthier. And having healthy relationships is integral to our physical well-being; one [meta-analysis](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20668659/) showed that people with more supportive social relationships have a 50% lower risk of premature death. To reshape the virtues of womanhood, a new “normal” needs to emerge—one in which we honor our emotions, prioritize our needs, and actively communicate our boundaries. Such a shift requires change on both the individual and societal level, and will by no means by easy. But it’s certainly worth it—after all, women’s lives depend on it. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/"},"headline":"Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick","datePublished":"2023-10-03T11:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:03:32.812Z","description":"For women, being more disappointing could be a lifesaver, writes Maytal Eyal.","url":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/","keywords":["Psychology","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Maytal Eyal","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/maytal-eyal/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/psychology/","name":"Psychology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/","name":"Self-Silencing Is Making Women Sick"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Therapists Raise Red Flags About Using 'Therapy Speak' Online","description":"The classic vision of therapy revolved around a person on a couch, supine, tapping into their deepest and darkest hopes and fears. A modern-day remix might look like this: a person still on a couch, but at home, scrolling through a constantly refreshing selection of mental-health content on social-media platforms like TikTok and Instagram.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/oxvh4VUE/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2023-08-24T19:27:11.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/oxvh4VUE.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/","duration":"PT4M7S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6319549/silencing-women-sick-essay/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```