--- title: Durham Report Is a Choose-Your-Own-Reality Adventure description: Responses to the Durham Report and the earlier Mueller Report lay bare the self-perpetuating partisan outrage machinery that runs Washington canonical: https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-05-17T21:49:58.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:51:12.870Z article:section: Politics og:title: Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Reality Adventure og:description: The responses to the Durham Report and the earlier Mueller Report lay bare the self-perpetuating partisan outrage machinery that hinders Washington og:url: https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt124930341606262c/698a3d194ee2622fb131b683/GettyImages-1241097983-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Clinton Attorney Michael Sussman Acquitted Of Charge Of Lying To The F.B.I. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Reality Adventure twitter:description: The responses to the Durham Report and the earlier Mueller Report lay bare the self-perpetuating partisan outrage machinery that hinders Washington twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt124930341606262c/698a3d194ee2622fb131b683/GettyImages-1241097983-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Political-Reality Adventure > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c4017829-ec1a-49e8-a076-18240358dcfd&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Twice a week | time.com/newsletters, September 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c4017829-ec1a-49e8-a076-18240358dcfd&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=c4017829-ec1a-49e8-a076-18240358dcfd&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c4017829-ec1a-49e8-a076-18240358dcfd&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Chris Sununu's Thoughts and Predictions About the 2024 Election [Watch (HLS stream): Chris Sununu's Thoughts and Predictions About the 2024 Election](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/de7zsW7x.m3u8) (1:34)  _Published 2023-04-25. Chris Sununu, Governor of New Hampshire, spoke to TIME Editor in Chief Sam Jacobs about the upcoming 2024 election at the Time 100 Summit on April 25._  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent May 17, 2023 9:49 PM UTC  Special Counsel John Durham arrives at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on May 26, 2022 in Washington, DC Special Counsel John Durham arrives at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on May 26, 2022 in Washington, DC Ron Sachs—Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent May 17, 2023 9:49 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ No serious player really wanted it, so a special counsel gets the tap on the shoulder. Mostly unlimited in scope, budget, and remit, the office has about as long a leash as exists in the current environment. Years upon years of work later, the project releases its final report. One side finds the results indisputably damning. The other insists the damning part is how little was found. Washington has played out this routine on a loop. First came the release of the [Mueller Report](https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/). Then, this week, the [Durham Report](https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf). Each focused on different aspects of the Trump orbit’s interactions with Russia and the FBI investigation that followed. Mueller’s report yielded convictions, plea deals, and jail time, but nothing that stuck to Trump. Durham’s report yielded two acquittals, one plea deal, and a ton of second guessing. More than anything, both gave partisans fodder for hours of trolling. Taken together, they reveal how our self-perpetuating partisan outrage machinery makes it harder for Washington to get anything constructive done with the fruits of investigations that cost tens of millions of dollars. Maybe it’s entirely our fault. We are a suppositioning sort. Where there are blanks, we fill them in, often in ways to match our existing biases. In fact, those vagaries allow many of us to arrive at book club meetings with very different interpretations of the same work based on the assumptions we brought to the plot and characters. The holes actually make for more compelling conversations than the agreed-upon facts. --- ### More from TIME --- It’s no different in politics, which relies on storytelling as much as policy. The gray area can sometimes be the most colorful. Special counsel John Durham, who then-Attorney General William Barr tapped to investigate those who had investigated his boss, released his much-awaited final [report](https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf) on Monday. Democrats largely shrugged off its 300 pages of findings as old news, recycled from [reports](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-doj-inspector-generals-report-on-the-fbis-russia-probe) from the Department of Justice inspectors general and three criminal cases that arose from the investigation. (Two of those cases ended in not guilty verdicts; a third defendant pleaded guilty to altering an email for a wiretap application.) Republicans, meanwhile, screamed bloody murder and political oppression so foul that one contender for the White House [suggested](https://www.foxnews.com/video/6327603316112) it was time to dismantle the FBI. The response has been an almost perfect reflection of the reaction to Robert Mueller’s two-volume [report](https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download) on the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia. In that case, Democrats spotted sin after sin committed by Trump and his crew while Republicans brushed it off as fake news that was, at best, old. The facts were damning, the indictments seemingly self-writing, the consequences manifestly missing. None of this is new, and little of it will be surprising for those who have watched special prosecutors wield almost unlimited power to produce lackluster results, time and time again. (Did we learn [nothing](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/us/politics/ken-starr-dead.html) from the Bill Clinton era?) But that doesn’t make the instinctive reaction to such findings any less a threat to society in which facts are ignored in service of a political agenda. While the timing was dodgy, the [findings](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-report-on-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-email-probe) of the FBI’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s private email [server](https://time.com/3943578/hillary-clinton-emails-personality/) were as clear as the Durham and Mueller probes—and carrying the same gaps that we tend to fill in with our own armchair indictments. Give us a gap, we will fill it with what we think we already know. As Durham rightly notes early in his report, efforts to bring criminal charges against anyone based on his investigation would face an uphill trek: “The law does not always make a person’s bad judgment, _even horribly bad judgment_, standing alone, a crime,” he writes. (Emphasis added.) “Nor does the law criminalize all unseemly or unethical conduct that political campaigns might undertake for tactical advantage, absent a violation of a particular federal criminal statute. Finally, in almost all cases, the government is required to prove a person’s actual criminal intent—not mere negligence or recklessness—before that person’s fellow citizens can lawfully find him or her guilty of a crime.” In other words, poor choices alone don’t automatically become legally criminal, no matter how much partisan outrage those choices may provoke. We can _There Ought To Be a Law_ things to death, but absent a relevant law, sketchy decisions about [doctored](https://apnews.com/article/durham-report-fbi-trump-clinton-2016-campaign-f3039e651eeb35a09091c363419e6766), [damning](https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/18/clinton-mueller-report-1282174), or [deleted](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/upshot/did-comey-cost-clinton-the-election-why-well-never-know.html) emails, often skirt by just fine. The wrongdoing can be spelled out as plainly as possible in these reports, but special counsels traditionally have been fairly unsatisfactory, especially when the missing pieces remain in desk drawers and off legislative calendars. It’s as if the [expired](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/special-counsel-less-independent-under-expired-watergate-era-law-n761311) law that made special counsels possible has rotted on the vine, and incompetence seems to breed plenty of reasons to think this is sadly normalizing. So, as yet another special counsel has found, people—even smart people in powerful positions—make boneheaded decisions. Yet unless they’re explicitly against the law and the fool knows it, those actions don’t rise to the level of crime. Add in the question of [conviction](https://time.com/6269056/trump-indictment-not-celebrity-trial/), and it’s terribly tough for these special counsels to yield anything approaching anything resembling consequences. Which is why, yet again, partisans will reach for the PDFs of these final reports and sketch their own indictments in the blank spaces. It is a Choose Your Own Adventure [approach](https://time.com/6237229/trump-dinner-nick-fuentes-kanye/) to political realities, one that may feel good to everyone involved but bad for the larger system, to boot. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ## Transcript To the current president. He just released a video announcing his, his second campaign from Office. The first word he used in that video was Freedom. He's framing this election is a choice between a book for the Democratic vote for Biden, vote, for more freedom. A vote for whoever the Republican candidate is about for gas Freedom. As a political analyst, what do you think of that? Is obviously, we're all folks will disagree, but you can't be out there like Joe Biden trying to increase the size of government. More rules, and regulations more barriers and say we're about freedom because it's a nice tagline. Is it? How Are we more free? Jaime? I I don't, I don't get it. You have to actually put something behind, you have to achieve what your, what your quote on quote fighting for I say this about, you know, people in the Republicans say we need Donald Trump cuz we need a fighter. Everybody wants a fighter, but what's the use of having a fight? If you never win the fight, right wife. He said he was going to drain the swamp unit drain the swamp. He said he was going to fix Healthcare. Do that? You said, is going to secure the borders. Republican, I support him and 16 in support of a 20. Thank you for the service, but we gotta move on to folks that I should get stuff done. I'm a governor I'm 24/7. The phone is always on them. Always held accountable. Not just my words. Exactly following. If he's the candidate in 24 and Joe Biden is the other candidate who you vote for for Trump. Don't worry. Trump is not going to be the nominee but there's a long way to go before that. But I'll also say I don't think you'll find is the number to either. I don't I think someone's going to challenge and probably right through New Hampshire to ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/"},"headline":"Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Political-Reality Adventure","datePublished":"2023-05-17T21:49:58.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:51:12.870Z","description":"The responses to the Durham Report and the earlier Mueller Report lay bare the self-perpetuating partisan outrage machinery that runs Washington","url":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt124930341606262c/698a3d194ee2622fb131b683/GettyImages-1241097983-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt124930341606262c/698a3d194ee2622fb131b683/GettyImages-1241097983-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Clinton Attorney Michael Sussman Acquitted Of Charge Of Lying To The F.B.I.","caption":"Clinton Attorney Michael Sussman Acquitted Of Charge Of Lying To The F.B.I.","creditText":"Ron Sachs—Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/","name":"Durham Report Is Latest Choose-Your-Own-Political-Reality Adventure"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Chris Sununu's Thoughts and Predictions About the 2024 Election","description":"Chris Sununu, Governor of New Hampshire, spoke to TIME Editor in Chief Sam Jacobs about the upcoming 2024 election at the Time 100 Summit on April 25.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/de7zsW7x/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2023-04-25T21:16:00.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/de7zsW7x.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/","duration":"PT1M34S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6280754/durham-report-trump-russia-mueller/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```