--- title: Feinstein Fight: Democrats Ignored Problem as it Got Worse description: Both Republicans and Democrats are struggling with issues rooted in their tendency to ignore a problem until it becomes a full-blown crisis. canonical: https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-04-13T18:54:58.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:44:12.244Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Washington Way: Ignore a Problem Until It's a Crisis og:description: Both Republicans and Democrats are struggling with issues rooted in their tendency to ignore a problem until it becomes a full-blown crisis. og:url: https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltadbce7ee8689ec31/698a3bffb3fce30c7f0ca5d2/GettyImages-1247148570.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Senator Dianne Feinstein Announces She Will Not Seek Re-election og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Washington Way: Ignore a Problem Until It's a Crisis twitter:description: Both Republicans and Democrats are struggling with issues rooted in their tendency to ignore a problem until it becomes a full-blown crisis. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltadbce7ee8689ec31/698a3bffb3fce30c7f0ca5d2/GettyImages-1247148570.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Washington Way: Ignore a Problem Until it Becomes a Crisis > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=741526b3-4757-44aa-9611-fe51425981e9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=741526b3-4757-44aa-9611-fe51425981e9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=741526b3-4757-44aa-9611-fe51425981e9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=741526b3-4757-44aa-9611-fe51425981e9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Apr 13, 2023 6:54 PM UTC  Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) arrives at the Senate Chamber for a vote at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 14, 2023 in Washington, DC. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) arrives at the Senate Chamber for a vote at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 14, 2023 in Washington, DC. Kent Nishimura—Los Angeles Times via Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Apr 13, 2023 6:54 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ At some point, everyone in Washington has to earn their keep by proving they can double as an ostrich, shoving their head in the sand and hoping no one can see them. There’s no more tried and true practice in politics than hoping a problem will go away by itself. But that way of life is not durable, and in the end, a ballooning interest payment always comes due. Delayed penance is Catechism, not democracy. This month, both Republicans and Democrats are facing situations where the reflex is to embrace ostrich behavior. One side did exactly that. The other side may be finally facing their surroundings for what they are. The Democrats are in the latter group, as Senator Dianne Feinstein announced late Wednesday that she wanted to temporarily step away from her spot on the powerful Judiciary Committee amid growing calls for her resignation. The 89-year-old icon from California has been away from Washington for more than a month, missing 58 votes and counting. But the issue that has made her position untenable is how her absence has left her committee stuck in neutral on confirming federal judges, the one thing Democrats in Congress can currently do to meaningfully advance their agenda. Feinstein’s declining performance has been atop the most unspoken issues in Washington for [quite some time](https://time.com/6167598/dianne-feinstein-age-congress/). She’s the oldest member of the Senate and, as such, is given tremendous deference. Still, things need to get done, and there are no signs if or when she might return from an absence attributed to a bad case of shingles. Democrats, long wary of seeming insensitive or ageist to their colleague, ultimately seemed to be forced into an honest assessment of the situation, led this week by Rep. Ro Khanna, who has already said Feinstein’s compromise solution of stepping down from the Judiciary Committee [isn’t enough](https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3948398-khanna-feinstein-offer-to-be-temporarily-replaced-on-key-panel-not-enough/). For Republicans, the problem isn’t coming from inside the Capitol, but the ballot box. Earlier this month, an unabashed liberal notched an 11-point [victory](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/04/us/politics/wisconsin-supreme-court-protasiewicz.html) in a Wisconsin state Supreme Court race that left Republicans stunned and the [high court](https://time.com/6173931/wisconsin-abortion-roe-supreme-court/) in Democrats’ hands. Janet Protasiewicz ran hard as a champion for abortion rights, capturing a seat that stands to restore abortion rights to Wisconsin. Given the stakes, it’s no surprise that the race ended as the most expensive state court race in American history. The Republican on the ballot, Dan Kelly, had the backing of the state’s biggest anti-abortion rights groups. Some Republicans took the rebuke as a wake-up call that their hard stance on abortion in a post-_Roe_ world is no longer sustainable, especially with younger voters. Among all voters, roughly 6-in-10 say abortion rights should be legal in some or all cases; look at a map right now, and only [38%](https://www.guttmacher.org/united-states/abortion) of women ages 13-44 live in a state supportive of abortion rights. But the response from Republicans with any power to adjust their party’s stance has been to instead double-down. A [few](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/11/us/politics/abortion-republicans-elections.html), like Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, are trying, and failing, to convince their party that they are setting themselves up for more losses. For further proof of Republicans’ head-in-the-sand mentality, there was the GOP’s deafening silence to a ruling out of Texas from a Trump-appointed federal judge around so-called abortion pills. Judge Mathew Kacsmaryk unilaterally [decided](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/11/us/abortion-pill-ruling.html) his [judgment](https://www.npr.org/2023/04/07/1159220452/abortion-pill-drug-mifepristone-judge-texas-amarillo) about a medication used for more than two decades superseded that of the Food and Drug Administration His unusual and aggressive ruling is hardly going to be the final word—an appeals court late Wednesday [seems](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/appeals-court-partially-blocks-ruling-imperils-access-key-abortion-pil-rcna79144) to have put that effort on hold, at least for now—but it did send Republican staffers trying to figure out how their bosses should respond to a ruling that even much of their base thinks is wrong-headed. But before the critics of denialism puff up their chest and declare the Republican Party the vastly more troubled entity—after all, Rep. George Santos [remains](https://time.com/6248641/drag-queen-george-santos-republicans/) a member of the House—it’s worth considering that Democrats are far from completely removing their heads from their sandboxes. They may be finally addressing the Feinstein question, but they still refuse to acknowledge the Biden one. The 80-year-old president is [seemingly](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/us/politics/biden-2024-election-running.html) the anointed nominee-in-waiting for 2024, but his age remains a persistent problem, one that will only become harder to ignore as next year’s primaries draw closer. And even Republicans may not be as myopic as they seem. This week, as a [school shooting](https://time.com/6270473/what-i-saw-nashville-covenant-school-shooting/) in [Tennessee](https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/03/27/us/nashville-shooting-covenant-school) and a [bank shooting](https://time.com/6269965/louisville-kentucky-shooting/) in [Louisville](https://www.nytimes.com/article/louisville-bank-shooting.html) prompted another round of Republican gnashing on gun safety, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican, [signed](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/tennessee-gop-governor-signs-executive-order-background-checks-rcna79227) an executive order that strengthened background checks for gun sales and told his legislature that he would also sign a red-flag law if it comes to his desk. It was an extraordinary move in a deep-red state, but one that suggests, at least for a fleeting moment, a seemingly intractable issue like the crisis of gun violence doesn’t have to always be framed as a partisan one. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/"},"headline":"The Washington Way: Ignore a Problem Until it Becomes a Crisis","datePublished":"2023-04-13T18:54:58.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:44:12.244Z","description":"For Democrats, the problem is one of their own. For Republicans, it's an unwillingness to adjust to a changing electorate.","url":"https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","democrats","republicans","Congress","Second click"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltadbce7ee8689ec31/698a3bffb3fce30c7f0ca5d2/GettyImages-1247148570.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltadbce7ee8689ec31/698a3bffb3fce30c7f0ca5d2/GettyImages-1247148570.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Senator Dianne Feinstein Announces She Will Not Seek Re-election","caption":"Senator Dianne Feinstein Announces She Will Not Seek Re-election","creditText":"Kent Nishimura—Los Angeles Times via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6271727/dianne-feinstein-absence-abortion-washington/","name":"The Washington Way: Ignore a Problem Until it Becomes a Crisis"}}]}] ```