--- title: Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most description: A new study shows how mining, oil and gas extraction, and power plants will proliferate across crucial wildlife sites around the world. canonical: https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/ author: Ciara Nugent article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-03-23T15:51:34.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:37:45.550Z article:section: Climate og:title: Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most og:description: A new study shows how mining, oil and gas extraction, and power plants will proliferate across crucial wildlife sites around the world. og:url: https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc4d2ea7010cdb2c/698a3b5d16d884979cc3ba94/GettyImages-1171180956.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2120 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Blue-breasted kingfisher Budongo Forest og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most twitter:description: A new study shows how mining, oil and gas extraction, and power plants will proliferate across crucial wildlife sites around the world. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc4d2ea7010cdb2c/698a3b5d16d884979cc3ba94/GettyImages-1171180956.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2176a0d5-8c93-4fed-8b5f-58bea7f4077c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2176a0d5-8c93-4fed-8b5f-58bea7f4077c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=2176a0d5-8c93-4fed-8b5f-58bea7f4077c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2176a0d5-8c93-4fed-8b5f-58bea7f4077c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Ciara Nugent](https://time.com/author/ciara-nugent/)  ## Ciara Nugent Mar 23, 2023 3:51 PM UTC  A Blue-breasted kingfisher in the Budongo Forest reserve, a key biodiversity area in Uganda. A Blue-breasted kingfisher in the Budongo Forest reserve, a key biodiversity area in Uganda. Michele D'Amico—Getty Images  by [Ciara Nugent](https://time.com/author/ciara-nugent/)  ## Ciara Nugent Mar 23, 2023 3:51 PM UTC The world faces an incredibly tricky land crunch over the coming decades. On the one hand, we want to protect more wildlife, having realized the critical role nature plays in limiting climate change and sustaining human life. On the other hand, we want to generate more energy than ever before for fast-developing countries in the Global South, and transition the entire world to renewables. That’s going to require a lot of new power plants and mines, which can be devastating for wildlife. A study [published today](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320723000538?via%3Dihub) in the journal _Biological Conservation_ highlights that mammoth clash of interests. Researchers looked at a list of 15,150 areas of land that conservation groups have classed as [the world’s most important](https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/) for protecting biodiversity. They compared those areas with a map of all the mining and energy projects that exist or are planned globally. Already, 5% of the key biodiversity sites contain mines, 14% contain oil and gas infrastructure, and 2% contain power plants. If all the planned projects came to pass, that would increase to 20%, 24%, and 11% respectively. The overlap will be particularly bad in biodiversity hotspots like Brazil, central Africa, and parts of east and south Asia. That creates an enormous challenge for policymakers in those areas as they balance global conservation goals with the economic opportunity of energy generation and resource extraction. Fossil fuel projects, present and future, have the biggest footprint, and the harm they can do to plants and animals is well understood. Oil and gas infrastructure tends to be built in incredibly remote places, disrupting previously pristine habitats. Construction activity on two pipelines in Nigeria’s Niger Delta in the 2010s, for example, drove the clearing of more than 9 million trees and triggered a “colossal loss” of biodiversity, according to[ a 2014 study.](https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=49859) Even once finished, oil and gas wells and pipelines can leach potent chemicals into nearby ecosystems, or kill thousands of creatures in a few seconds during major spills. But the researchers noted that a large chunk of the future threat to wildlife will come from efforts to transition to renewables and combat climate change. Clean energy sources like solar, wind, and hydropower require much larger areas of land to produce the same amount of energy as fossil fuels. Clean technologies like electric vehicles, batteries, and wind turbines require vast amounts of metals and minerals, which is driving a new global mining boom. Clean energy infrastructure doesn’t necessarily need to be as harmful to wildlife as its fossil fuel predecessors. The lithium mining sector, whose huge water consumption has dried up the sources that humans and wildlife depend on in South America, for example, is trying to develop [more sustainable methods ](https://time.com/6200372/lithium-mining-technology-argentina-gold/)of extraction. Meanwhile, some wind power companies are trying to [reduce their industry’s toll](https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200302-how-do-wind-farms-affect-bats-birds-and-other-wildlife) on bird populations by choosing sites less visited by birds, and trialing sensor technologies to prevent collisions with threatened species. But the study’s authors say authorities need to do more to make sure those kinds of efforts become mandatory. “More effective application and wider adoption of biodiversity policies by both governments and the financial sector is needed to ensure global infrastructure development avoids impacts on biodiversity,” they write. “We recognise that infrastructure is essential to human development, but it’s about building smartly,” said Ash Simkins, a Zoology PhD student at the University of Cambridge who led the study. “This means ideally avoiding or otherwise minimizing infrastructure in the most important locations for biodiversity. If the infrastructure must be there, then it should be designed to cause as little damage as possible, and the impacts more than compensated for elsewhere.” **_A version of this story also appears in the_** **Climate is Everything** **_newsletter. To sign up,_** [**_click here_**](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/newsletters/?newsletter%5Fname=climate&source=onsite)**_._** ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/"},"headline":"Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most","datePublished":"2023-03-23T15:51:34.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:37:45.550Z","description":"A new study shows how mining, oil and gas extraction, and power plants will proliferate across crucial wildlife sites around the world.","url":"https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/","keywords":["Conservation","climate change","embargoed study","healthscienceclimate"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc4d2ea7010cdb2c/698a3b5d16d884979cc3ba94/GettyImages-1171180956.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ciara Nugent","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/ciara-nugent/"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc4d2ea7010cdb2c/698a3b5d16d884979cc3ba94/GettyImages-1171180956.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Blue-breasted kingfisher Budongo Forest","caption":"Blue-breasted kingfisher","creditText":"Michele D'Amico—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/conservation/","name":"Conservation"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6265474/energy-mining-biodiversity-hotspots/","name":"Where Mining and Energy Projects Will Hurt Wildlife the Most"}}]}] ```