<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/" -->

---
title: Presidential Election Will Be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory
description: The 2024 political campaign will be about how we remember the pandemic
canonical: https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/
author: Jacob Steere-Williams
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2023-03-23T11:00:39.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T12:41:40.188Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Presidential Election Will Be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory
og:description: The 2024 political campaign will be about how we remember the pandemic
og:url: https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: Anti-Vaccine Demonstration On The National
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Presidential Election Will Be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory
twitter:description: The 2024 political campaign will be about how we remember the pandemic
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# The Next U.S. Presidential Election will be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="bdc7da3e-c096-48fb-a7bb-c9fae256a38c" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bdc7da3e-c096-48fb-a7bb-c9fae256a38c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bdc7da3e-c096-48fb-a7bb-c9fae256a38c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=bdc7da3e-c096-48fb-a7bb-c9fae256a38c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by [Jacob Steere-Williams](https://time.com/author/jacob-steere-williams/) and [Gavin Yamey](https://time.com/author/gavin-yamey/)

Mar 23, 2023 11:00 AM UTC

![Anti-Vaccine Demonstration On The National](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Demonstrators march to the Lincoln Memorial during an anti-vaccine mandate rally on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Sunday, Jan. 23, 2022.

Demonstrators march to the Lincoln Memorial during an anti-vaccine mandate rally on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Sunday, Jan. 23, 2022. Eric Lee-Bloomberg/Getty Images

by [Jacob Steere-Williams](https://time.com/author/jacob-steere-williams/) and [Gavin Yamey](https://time.com/author/gavin-yamey/)

Mar 23, 2023 11:00 AM UTC

When Ron DeSantis, Florida’s Republican governor and 2024 presidential hopeful, was inaugurated for a second term in February, DeSantis centered his vision for the next four years on the idea that “freedom lives” in the Sunshine State. Baked into DeSantis’ speech was an emerging battle for the public memory of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Over the past few years,” he said, “as so many states in our country grinded their citizens down, we in Florida lifted our people up. When other states consigned their people’s freedom to the dustbin, Florida stood strongly as freedom’s linchpin.”

Yet behind this soaring rhetoric of liberty lies a very uncomfortable fact that DeSantis wants us to forget: Florida has been among the worst-performing states when it comes to protecting people from COVID-19 deaths.

As Oliver Johnson, mathematician at the University of Bristol, England, [noted](https://twitter.com/BristOliver/status/1602986416371277824?s=20&t=yzEpI0qwN0t7ZJaaxnZopg) last December, if Florida were a country, its COVID-19 death rate would put it at “10th worst in the world, behind Peru and various East European countries that got slammed pre-vaccine.”

It’s true that Florida has a high proportion of older people, who face the greatest risk of death from COVID-19 if infected by the coronavirus, and the state’s performance looks better if its COVID-19 death rate is [adjusted for age](https://covid19florida.mystrikingly.com/deaths). And when you examine deaths from all causes (known as “all-cause mortality”) over the full three years of the pandemic, Florida’s performance is only [a little worse](https://twitter.com/Marco%5FPiani/status/1635963364420599809?s=20) than that of California. But Florida is doing extremely poorly at vaccinating its most vulnerable citizens. Booster coverage among elderly residents of nursing facilities in Florida is the [second lowest](https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/entering-the-winter-season-how-many-nursing-facility-residents-and-staff-were-up-to-date-with-their-covid-19-vaccines/) among all U.S. states, and general booster rates are among the [worst](https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/states-ranked-by-booster-rates.html) in the nation. These critical public health indexes are unlikely to improve, given DeSantis’s [embrace](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/379/bmj.o3061.full.pdf) of anti-vaccine rhetoric. Such rhetoric plays well with the conservative base that he needs to excite if he is to beat Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary.


Across the country, Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, [rumored](https://calmatters.org/politics/election-2022/2022/10/gavin-newsom-campaign-president/) to be a possible presidential candidate if President Biden doesn’t run for a second term, was also sworn in for a second term. He too campaigned under the rhetorical glint of freedom, upheld by his version of the history of the pandemic; and he too had his own struggles curbing the COVID-19 pandemic.

“In our finest hours,” Newsom boasted, “California has been freedom’s force multiplier. Protecting liberty from a rising tide of oppression taking root in statehouses.” Newsom’s version of freedom includes a protection of reproductive rights, access to health care, and green growth, which he contrasted with the January 6th, 2021 attack on the White House amidst turmoil over pandemic policies. In a statement seemingly hurled directly at DeSantis, Newsom argued that “Red state politicians, and the media empire behind them,” are “selling regression as progress, oppression as freedom.”


The context for the continued debates over COVID-19 policy in the U.S. is in part the ongoing death toll of around 2,700 deaths every week. But the subtext is the looming 2024 presidential election. Both likely seeking their respective party’s nomination, DeSantis’ and Newsom’s political platforms squarely rest on a calculated set of claims about how they see the history of the past three years.

As we enter what promises to be a fierce campaign cycle, Americans will be voting for more than their next president. They are voting over the public memory of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both Republican and Democratic nominees will present a vision of the past three years that panders to their respective bases and distorts the history of the pandemic. Pandemic memories, in other words, are jarringly malleable political weapons.

Despite an uptick in COVID-19 cases in the 2022-23 holiday season, around [6 in 10 Americans](https://today.yougov.com/topics/international/articles-reports/2023/01/12/bipartisan-support-requiring-negative-covid-test) say they think the worst of the pandemic is behind us. But how do we reckon with the mass death, disability, and orphanhood that COVID-19 caused in the U.S.? As Yea-Hung Chen, epidemiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, [told](https://www.npr.org/2023/01/28/1152313347/three-years-after-covid-19-started-scientists-have-learned-valuable-lessons) NPR: “There are neighborhoods & communities in the U.S. where you have COVID deaths maybe every three homes. It’s just been numbingly awful.”


Some U.S. politicians are attempting to memorialize what we have been through. Kentucky governor, Andy Beshear, for instance, [announced](https://www.state-journal.com/opinion/editorial-covid-memorial-will-be-welcome-addition-to-capitol-grounds/article%5F1a7dff98-95cd-11ed-a6a3-2b87c001a876.html) in January that state officials are constructing a COVID-19 memorial on the capitol grounds in Lexington to honor the nearly 18,000 Kentuckians who have died of COVID-19\. One Houston couple, Mohammed and Ruth Nasrullah, have curated a virtual memorial, “COVID-19 Wall of Memories,” sharing personal stories of 15,000 Americans whose lives were lost to the pandemic.

As we enter a new phase of the pandemic, one centered on how to remember, we might look towards the past. Reeling from World War I and the devastating impact of the 1918 influenza pandemic, Ohio’s Republican Senator Warren G. Harding spoke before the Home Market Club of Boston on May 14th, 1920, in what became a hallmark speech, “Back to Normal.” His speech is credited as helping him win a convincing victory in the Presidential Election in November 1920 over Democratic candidate James Cox (Harding won 60% of the popular vote). “Poise has been disturbed, and nerves have been wracked, and fever has rendered men irrational,” Harding began. “America’s present need,” he urged, “is not heroics, but healing; not nostrums, but normalcy; not revolution, but restoration; not agitation, but adjustment; not surgery, but serenity.”


Taking aim squarely at former president Woodrow Wilson’s progressive foreign and domestic policies, and set against the context of race riots in Chicago, strikes in the steel and meat packing industries, and controversial attempts by local authorities to ban public gatherings and institute mask mandates to curb the flu pandemic, Harding jabbed that “the world needs to be reminded that all human ills are not curable by legislation.” “Let’s get out of the fevered delirium,” Harding concluded, and head towards the “normal forward stride of the American people.”

Harding struck a chord that many Americans wanted to hear in 1920, campaigning on freedom, resiliency, and, above all else, normalcy. And in part it worked, ushering in a wave of so-called post-pandemic normalcy, a term coined in 1976 by historian Alfred Crosby in _America’s Forgotten Pandemic._ Many Americans today, gripped by the collective trauma of the COVID-19 pandemic of the past three years, will likely resonate with the same campaign promises, which is why on both sides of the political aisle, DeSantis and Newsom are gearing up their campaigns under the banner of freedom. But, like Harding’s victory in 1920, the deeper battle this election cycle will be over pandemic memory.


The U.S. ended 2022 with something of a cultural amnesia over the ongoing pandemic, with a wish to forget the past three years. Throughout the pandemic, one common, nonpartisan frustration has been: “why does the pandemic have to be so political?” The answer is that politics always permeates public health. What we need to brace for now is the politics of historical memory. How will the first three years of the pandemic be remembered? How will they be forgotten?

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/"},"headline":"The Next U.S. Presidential Election will be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory","datePublished":"2023-03-23T11:00:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T12:41:40.188Z","description":"The 2024 political campaign will be about how we remember the pandemic","url":"https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/","keywords":["COVID-19","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jacob Steere-Williams","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jacob-steere-williams/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Gavin Yamey","jobTitle":"Yamey is a physician and professor of global health and public policy at Duke University","url":"https://time.com/author/gavin-yamey/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt332624b6d0193557/698a3b4f22fb856a1ce2e820/GettyImages-1237943031.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Anti-Vaccine Demonstration On The National","caption":"Anti-Vaccine Demonstration On The National","creditText":"Eric Lee-Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6264942/political-battle-over-pandemic-memory/","name":"The Next U.S. Presidential Election will be a Battle Over Pandemic Memory"}}]}]
```

