--- title: Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come description: Climate change and immigration will dramatically reshape the world's borders, writes James Crawford canonical: https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/ author: James Crawford article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-02-18T12:00:54.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:27:57.819Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come og:description: Climate change and immigration will dramatically reshape the world's borders, writes James Crawford og:url: https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb0b00c3198d6e68f/698a3a73b3fce308010ca342/GettyImages-1246399103.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-MIGRATION-BORDER-WALL og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come twitter:description: Climate change and immigration will dramatically reshape the world's borders, writes James Crawford twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb0b00c3198d6e68f/698a3a73b3fce308010ca342/GettyImages-1246399103.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eb6af15-beff-4c6d-ac70-9a896a5bbadd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eb6af15-beff-4c6d-ac70-9a896a5bbadd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4eb6af15-beff-4c6d-ac70-9a896a5bbadd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4eb6af15-beff-4c6d-ac70-9a896a5bbadd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [James Crawford](https://time.com/author/james-crawford/) ## James Crawford Feb 18, 2023 12:00 PM UTC  Looking like a train traveling across the desert, a long row of shipping containers stacked to create a wall between the United States and Mexico awaits removal in the Coronado National Forest near Hereford, Arizona, on January 20, 2023\. - A wall of shipping containers installed just a few months ago by the then-governor of Arizona at a $100 million cost to US taxpayers was being dismantled on January 20\. Republican Doug Ducey ordered the huge line of shipping containers to be placed at the frontier between the United States and Mexico, during the final months of his administration, in what he said was a bid to stem illegal immigration. But after being sued by Washington for putting the containers on federal land in the Coronado National Forest, Ducey Looking like a train traveling across the desert, a long row of shipping containers stacked to create a wall between the United States and Mexico awaits removal in the Coronado National Forest near Hereford, Arizona, on January 20, 2023\. - A wall of shipping containers installed just a few months ago by the then-governor of Arizona at a $100 million cost to US taxpayers was being dismantled on January 20\. Republican Doug Ducey ordered the huge line of shipping containers to be placed at the frontier between the United States and Mexico, during the final months of his administration, in what he said was a bid to stem illegal immigration. But after being sued by Washington for putting the containers on federal land in the Coronado National Forest, Ducey Robyn BECK-AFP by [James Crawford](https://time.com/author/james-crawford/) ## James Crawford Feb 18, 2023 12:00 PM UTC Our modern world now has more borderlines than ever before in human history. Not only that, but walls, barriers and fences, and the repressive border policies that go with them, are in clear view across the political, and consequently physical, landscape. At the end of the Cold War, just 12 border walls stood around the globe. Today that figure has risen to 74, with the majority constructed since the beginning of the 2000s. What is becoming less clear, however, is what they are actually dividing. While bordering has existed for millennia, how borders are conceived and operated has changed considerably. Our present system is only 350 years old, product of a peace treaty—the 1648 settlement of Westphalia—drawn up after decades of European religious war. Its basic principle established the right of a monarch’s exclusive authority over religion, government, taxation, law and the military _within a_ _specific geographical area_. Where previously political dominion in feudal Europe had been impossible to map spatially, borders offered clear lines of separation and control. Out of this came the concept of sovereignty and later the emergence of the nation state and nationalism. Borders were the conduits for shared stories of culture and belonging—for those inside the lines. But, as the supremacy of religion was replaced by the new god of industrialism, they also became the means of corralling resources, of establishing colonies, wealth and empire. For a time, borders were always on the move, being drawn and redrawn and rubbed out by expansionist powers: a process that culminated, ultimately, in the devastation of two World Wars. What we have today however (with the obvious exception of Russia’s war with Ukraine, a conflict driven by Vladimir Putin’s manic nostalgia to reclaim the borders of a long-lost motherland) is a calcification, a closing-off. Less of nation from nation, though, than of rich from poor. By the summer of 2022, the U.N. Refugee Agency (UNHCR) [reported](https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/insights/explainers/100-million-forcibly-displaced.html#:~:text=More%20than%20100%20million%20people%20are%20forcibly%20displaced&text=At%20the%20end%20of%202021,flee%20stood%20at%2089.3%20million.) that the global number of forcibly displaced people had passed 100 million for the first time. Largely, the rise of the latest generation of border walls is aimed at controlling, funnelling, and stemming the flow of these displaced (along with many others seeking to leave the borders within which they were born). Or, rather, the walls are aimed at _being seen_ to stem the flow. The efficacy of border barriers—particularly given the spectacular costs of their construction—is often limited when measured in terms of preventing movement and entry. The symbolism, on the other hand, is potent. Take the U.S.-Mexico border wall. In recent years, there have been two bizarre attempts to have fragments of it designated as national monuments of special cultural significance. The first, in late 2017, was a piece of satire by a Swiss conceptual artist proposing that the Trump-administration’s border wall prototypes be preserved as land art. The second, in April 2021, came from former Republican Congressional Representative, Madison Cawthorn, who put forward a [draft bill](https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2021/04/13/rep-madison-cawthorn-introduces-donument-act-to-protect-trumps-border-wall/?sh=3ed1f2424610) for designating 400 miles of border wall in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas as a national monument with “permanent protection from alteration.” The sad prospect of a line of rusting steel being held up as an icon of national identity tells us much about the shifting nature of borders. Walls appeal to voter bases who want to see strength on the frontiers. They offer up images of power and security which the barriers themselves—relics of a simpler era before globalisation and the internet—simply cannot guarantee. Meanwhile, the real bordering increasingly happens elsewhere, far beyond the lines of national territory. The British government’s attempt to [transfer refugees](https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-61782866) washing up on its shores to the African state of Rwanda, 4,000 miles to the south, is, in essence, a bid to “outsource” its borderline for those it deems ineligible for direct entry. U.S. Border Patrol has operated not just at the southern border with Mexico, but also beyond Mexico’s own southern border: an initiative begun in 2019 saw agents deployed to Guatemala with the specific objective of working with local law enforcement to help decrease the flow of migrants to the U.S. In 2021 the E.U.’s dedicated border agency Frontex was accused of training and equipping the Libyan Coast Guard as a proxy border force, dedicated to ensuring that migrants crossing the Mediterranean were returned to Africa, to be held in appalling conditions in militia-run prisons or detention camps that were indirectly supported by E.U. humanitarian aid. This trend of reaching beyond national borders—beyond traditional sovereignty—was driven in no small part by the goal of identifying potential terror threats in the wake of 9/11\. But over time it has evolved into something else: a mechanism for projecting buffer zones, virtual borders, far out across the world. Making what were once migrant jumping-off points, like the North African coast, into migrant stopping points. Alongside this has emerged a new data landscape. As our governments gather and store ever more information about us—often now sharing it with other states as part of joint security arrangements—the process of international travel is as much about the journey of our digital surrogates as it is about our ‘analogue’ selves. In July 2022, when the British Home Secretary announced an initiative to create a ‘contactless digital border’ so that the U.K. border could become the ‘most effective in the world’, these implications were made plain. And, in January this year, when the Biden administration outlined its new measures for border enforcement to ‘expand and expedite legal pathways for orderly migration’, a key component was an online portal for migrants— with a smartphone app that can begin the process of digitising the undocumented. Borders are pushing outwards, but they are also, simultaneously, looking inwards. Focussing on the unique terrain of the individual. Such developments—particularly in the wealthy, data-obsessed global north—are surely inevitable. But it does beg the question: what happens to people from less technologically advanced parts of the world? Could those who have no digital presence, the poorest and most unfortunate, be ‘bordered’ out of large swathes of the earth? (And might this be the point?). And even for the data-rich citizen, the implications are unclear. The importance of the individual has always been at the heart of the development of universal human rights. At the same time, as we have seen in China, data-driven state-surveillance has become a tool for exercising all-encompassing authoritarian social control—bordering behaviours, rewarding the patriotic and punishing the non-patriotic. This is a long way from guards on a wall, looking out for intruders on the horizon. The reality is that borders as we know them—_or as we thought we knew them—_are fracturing and failing. While many may cling to the illusion offered by walls and fences, these barriers, and the cartographical lines that they mark, have already become semi-symbolic spaces, as the political focus shifts beyond them towards managing and arresting the global movement of the displaced, or zooms in on the minutiae of the personal. What all this ignores, of course, is that humanity does have one true, indisputable borderline. As a 2020 research study revealed, for the past 6,000 years at least, the vast majority of people have lived in the same, strikingly narrow slice of the total available climate space on earth (where mean annual temperature is between 11 and 15C). Yet, with the impacts of global warming, this human climate niche, is projected to move more in the next 50 years than in the previous six millennia. The study posed the hypothetical notion that, if humans in the future are to avoid living in places where they, by and large, have never lived, and follow the migration of the niche, then you get the staggering figure of 3.5 billion on the move. And if people don’t move then, by 2070, potentially one third of humanity will be living in conditions currently found in only a handful of places, most of which are currently in the Sahara Desert. Many other species are already migrating _en masse—_plants and animals heading towards the poles, retreating from valleys to places higher up hills and mountains. Many (although not all) are almost entirely unencumbered by walls and political borders. Humanity long ago renounced such unfettered freedom of movement. And as our species niche drifts rapidly across the hemispheres, what will our artificial borders do? Flex or open? Harden? Or break apart completely under the strain? ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/"},"headline":"Why Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come","datePublished":"2023-02-18T12:00:54.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:27:57.819Z","description":"Climate change and immigration will dramatically reshape the world's borders","url":"https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/","keywords":["society","climate change","freelance","Excerpt"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb0b00c3198d6e68f/698a3a73b3fce308010ca342/GettyImages-1246399103.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"James Crawford","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/james-crawford/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb0b00c3198d6e68f/698a3a73b3fce308010ca342/GettyImages-1246399103.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-MIGRATION-BORDER-WALL","caption":"US-POLITICS-MIGRATION-BORDER-WALL","creditText":"Robyn BECK-AFP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/society/","name":"society"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6256611/borders-as-we-know-them-wont-survive-the-century-to-come/","name":"Why Borders as We Know Them Won’t Survive the Century to Come"}}]}] ```