<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/" -->

---
title: Biodiversity Needs To Be A Climate Priority
description: As COP15 commences, we need to set more ambitious goals to protect half our lands and oceans, write Julia Jackson and Eric Dinerstein.
canonical: https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/
author: TIME
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2022-12-07T11:00:39.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:44:44.323Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Biodiversity Needs To Be A Climate Priority
og:description: As COP15 commences, we need to set more ambitious goals to protect half our lands and oceans, write Julia Jackson and Eric Dinerstein.
og:url: https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2108
og:image:height: 1186
og:image:alt: Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Biodiversity Needs To Be A Climate Priority
twitter:description: As COP15 commences, we need to set more ambitious goals to protect half our lands and oceans, write Julia Jackson and Eric Dinerstein.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Biodiversity Needs To Be a Climate Priority

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="7b3a2acb-9be4-4608-ae43-cec2e7b92603" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7b3a2acb-9be4-4608-ae43-cec2e7b92603&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7b3a2acb-9be4-4608-ae43-cec2e7b92603&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=7b3a2acb-9be4-4608-ae43-cec2e7b92603&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/xkBy8TiW.m3u8" -->
## Video: Why Climate Protesters Are Throwing Food at Art

[Watch (HLS stream): Why Climate Protesters Are Throwing Food at Art](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/xkBy8TiW.m3u8) (1:55)

![Why Climate Protesters Are Throwing Food at Art](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/xkBy8TiW/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2022-11-14. European climate protesters have taken up a new tactic in the fight to curb global emissions: throwing food at famous paintings._


by [Julia Jackson](https://time.com/author/julia-jackson/) and [Eric Dinerstein](https://time.com/author/eric-dinerstein/)

Dec 7, 2022 11:00 AM UTC

![Sea otter floating in kelp](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Getty Images

by [Julia Jackson](https://time.com/author/julia-jackson/) and [Eric Dinerstein](https://time.com/author/eric-dinerstein/)

Dec 7, 2022 11:00 AM UTC

On Dec. 7, 2022, the United Nations will meet in Montréal to set targets to prevent mass extinction. It is the most important meeting you’ve likely never heard of. The decisions that will be made at the 15th U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (abbreviated as COP-15 or CBD) in Montréal will alter, and could even save, all of life on Earth. And yet some nations are trying to weaken the targets.

Human survival and global economies depend on a complex, interconnected web of millions of nonhuman species. Sea otters [double the amount](https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-09/sea-otters-are-unlikely-helpers-our-fight-against-climate-change) of carbon sequestered by ocean kelp forests by snacking on sea urchins that eat kelp. Elephants[ knock over](https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2020/12/pdf/how-african-elephants-fight-climate-change-ralph-chami.pdf) trees and shrubs that feed other animals while creating corridors that contain the spread of wildfires. Woodpeckers [eat disease-spreading pests](https://www.maine.gov/dacf/php/gotpests/othercritters/woodpeckers.htm) that other animals cannot reach, protecting the health of forests that capture and store carbon. Prairie dogs [aerate the soil and improve irrigation](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257839709%5FPrairie%5FDog%5FDecline%5FReduces%5Fthe%5FSupply%5Fof%5FEcosystem%5FServices%5Fand%5FLeads%5Fto%5FDesertification%5Fof%5FSemiarid%5FGrasslands) in the American Midwest, where over one-fifth of U.S. food production is now at risk due to [drought](https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/). We rely on bees and other insects to pollinate [three quarters](https://www.fao.org/3/i9527en/i9527en.pdf) of our crops. Mangroves sequester [four times](https://news.mongabay.com/2018/05/new-study-finds-mangroves-may-store-way-more-carbon-than-we-thought/amp/) the amount of carbon as tropical forests but are mowed down by commercial shrimping and developers of luxury beachfront hotels.

All these species, and countless more, remain endangered or under threat due to unchecked human industrial activity, deforestation, invasions of non-native species, industrial fishing, poaching, and human-caused climate change. A football field-sized area of forest is cut down [every second](https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/planet-earth/forests-and-deserts/rate-of-deforestation). According to the [Living Planet Report](https://livingplanet.panda.org/en-US/), we’ve lost an average of 69% of all vertebrate populations since 1970\. 150 species are lost [every day](https://www.cbd.int/doc/speech/2007/sp-2007-05-22-es-en.pdf), and one million species [could vanish](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/ipbes-un-biodiversity-report-warns-one-million-species-at-risk) in the coming decades. The sixth mass extinction event is now well underway.

**_Read More:_** [_Healthy Biodiversity Is The Reason To Fight Climate Change_](https://time.com/6234466/healthy-biodiversity-climate-change/)

The main platform for global action on this issue is the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity. Unlike annual U.N. climate talks to reduce emissions (the most recent being [COP27](https://time.com/6235427/climate-cop27/) in Egypt), negotiations to protect biodiversity happen only once every two years and get far less attention despite being as critical to tackling climate change as curbing our extraction and combustion of fossil fuels. Our forests, oceans, and soils can capture and store vast amounts of this carbon. Protecting these ecosystems, and the millions of plant and animal species that animate them, is imperative if we are to meet the U.N.’s [goal](https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-change/#:~:text=To%20limit%20warming%20to%201.5,to%20net%20zero%20by%202050.) of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Many [parties](https://www.hacfornatureandpeople.org/home), from Costa Rica and France to the United Kingdom and United States, have been calling for a “[30×30” target](https://www.nature.org/en-us/what-we-do/our-insights/perspectives/effective-area-based-biodiversity-conservation-defra/)—protecting only 30% of lands and oceans to be protected by 2030—but it’s simply not enough.


---

### More from TIME

---

In 2020, scientists analyzed the world’s remaining natural lands in a [landmark report](https://www.globalsafetynet.app/), concluding that “…50% of the terrestrial realm, if conserved, would reverse further biodiversity loss, prevent CO2 emissions from land conversion, and enhance natural carbon removal.” Numerous subsequent studies have landed on a target between 40-50% as necessary to preserve biodiversity and the ecosystem services upon which the entire world relies. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (through the [Motion 101](https://wild.org/motion-101/) initiative), the International Panel on Climate Change, and several parties of the CBD (including the Vatican), have called for a global target of 50% that safeguards the rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). A [recent report](https://report.territoriesoflife.org/) by the ICCA, a global association supporting recognition of indigenous and community conserved territories, found that over 40% of land vital for biodiversity is governed by IPLCs. When combined with existing government protected areas, the world is already protecting and conserving 34% of the world’s land. With the current mass extinction crisis, it’s clear that a far more ambitious target is necessary.


The job of the U.N. member countries is to set policies to protect global security and peace, not by settling for what industry lobbyists have deemed “possible,” but by uniting to achieve what is necessary. The cold, hard scientific truth is that we must set more ambitious, urgent targets to protect half of our lands and oceans, and in a faster timeframe than 2050\. Over 100 Indigenous groups, a large coalition of civil society organizations, and over [3 million people](https://www.globaldealfornature.org/) worldwide have called for global leaders to commit to this 50% target. We need even more people to join this growing chorus in the lead-up to CBD.

Funding for developing nations to protect their biodiversity continues to be a major point of division in U.N. negotiations, but it shouldn’t be. Many of the world’s most biodiverse regions are in under-resourced nations who will need support from wealthier nations to meet the targets set in Montréal. According to U.N.’s 2021 [_State of Finance for Nature report_](https://www.unep.org/resources/state-finance-nature), committing just 0.1% of global GDP would avoid the breakdown of life-sustaining ecosystems. However, current funding commitments from developed nations [leave a $4 trillion gap](https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/36147/SFN%5FInf3.pdf), putting targets to protect half of nature well out of reach.


It is in developed nations’ economic and security interests to support developing countries with adequate funding to meet global biodiversity targets. Because natural ecosystems and human economies are interconnected, biodiversity loss in even one part of the world can quickly cascade into an economic crisis for us all. [Half of global GDP](https://www.weforum.org/press/2020/01/half-of-world-s-gdp-moderately-or-highly-dependent-on-nature-says-new-report/) depends on healthy biodiversity, from medicine and food supply to clean air and water, and a stable climate.

If CBD negotiations continue to happen out of the public spotlight, polluting industries, multinational corporations, and bad actors have seemingly free reign to shape the future of our lands, our oceans, and our climate. We need more climate activists to take U.N. biodiversity talks as seriously as we take U.N. climate talks, and we need more climate journalists to cover these negotiations to hold our world leaders accountable.

The decisions made in Montréal this Dec. may be the most consequential in human history. Everyone should pay attention.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/"},"headline":"Biodiversity Needs To Be a Climate Priority","datePublished":"2022-12-07T11:00:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:44:44.323Z","description":"As COP15 commences, we need to set more ambitious goals to protect half our lands and oceans, write Julia Jackson and Eric Dinerstein.","url":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/","keywords":["climate change","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Julia Jackson","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/julia-jackson/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Eric Dinerstein","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/eric-dinerstein/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt470c843c7f5d0e7f/698a389486f68e2c546f1f98/Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Biodiversity-Cop15-Sea-Otter-Kelp","caption":"Sea otter floating in kelp","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/","name":"Biodiversity Needs To Be a Climate Priority"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Why Climate Protesters Are Throwing Food at Art","description":"European climate protesters have taken up a new tactic in the fight to curb global emissions: throwing food at famous paintings.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/xkBy8TiW/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2022-11-14T21:20:03.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/xkBy8TiW.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/","duration":"PT1M55S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6239146/biodiversity-climate-priority-cop15/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

