--- title: Montana's Anti-Abortion Referendum Rejected by Voters description: Montana was one of five states with abortion-related ballot measures on Tuesday, and in all cases, voters chose to protect abortion access. canonical: https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/ author: Katie Reilly article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-11-10T23:06:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:02:15.929Z article:section: Politics og:title: Montana's Anti-Abortion Referendum Rejected by Voters og:description: Montana was one of five states with abortion-related ballot measures on Tuesday, and in all cases, voters chose to protect abortion access. og:url: https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb23b8cd4105ecb25/698a37c3e6e84af4bd2af8ee/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5000 og:image:height: 2813 og:image:alt: Abortion rights activist holds a placard saying, Vote for og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Montana's Anti-Abortion Referendum Rejected by Voters twitter:description: Montana was one of five states with abortion-related ballot measures on Tuesday, and in all cases, voters chose to protect abortion access. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb23b8cd4105ecb25/698a37c3e6e84af4bd2af8ee/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Voters Rejected Montana’s Anti-Abortion Referendum. Here’s What it Means > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=edcebe93-edb1-45b2-bc88-b0dafd07be08&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=edcebe93-edb1-45b2-bc88-b0dafd07be08&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=edcebe93-edb1-45b2-bc88-b0dafd07be08&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Nov 10, 2022 11:06 PM UTC  An abortion-rights activist holds a sign protesting a state abortion ban in Bloomington, Ind., on Sept. 15, 2022. An abortion-rights activist holds a sign protesting a state abortion ban in Bloomington, Ind., on Sept. 15, 2022. Jeremy Hogan—Getty Images  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Nov 10, 2022 11:06 PM UTC Voters in Montana rejected a ballot measure that would have declared an embryo or fetus a legal person entitled to medical care if they are “born alive” at any stage of development, including after attempted abortions. Montana was [one of five states](https://time.com/6231690/abortion-election-results-2022/) with abortion-related ballot measures on Tuesday, and was the only one left unresolved. In all five cases, voters moved to protect abortion access—a victory for abortion-rights advocates, even in the conservative states of Kentucky and Montana. The Montana referendum, which about 53% of voters opposed, would have imposed “criminal penalties on health care providers who do not act to preserve the life of such infants, including infants born during an attempted abortion.” Health care providers who violated the law would have faced a fine of up to $50,000 and 20 years in prison. Proponents of the referendum argued it would protect infants. But critics said it would limit the kind of care doctors can provide and was unnecessary, given that infanticide is already illegal under state law. They also warned it would “elevate a false anti-abortion narrative.” Experts note that abortions after fetal viability are very rare. Just 1% of abortions in the U.S. occur at or after 21 weeks of pregnancy, according to analysis by the [Kaiser Family Foundation](https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/abortions-later-in-pregnancy/). And [CDC data show](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health%5Fpolicy/mortality-records-mentioning-termination-of-pregnancy.htm) that rare cases of a fetus surviving an abortion and then dying often involve severe fetal health conditions or pregnancy complications. “I think voters may also have kind of thought this was a solution in search of a problem,” says Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis and an expert on abortion politics. “It’s yet another signal that voters in conservative states, who are certainly not necessarily open to voting for Democratic candidates, are open to voting for access to abortion when the question is presented to them directly.” Montana has a Republican governor and a Republican-controlled state legislature, but other states have [stronger abortion restrictions](https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/montana/abortion-policies). The state bans abortion at fetal viability, which is about 24 to 26 weeks into pregnancy. By comparison, the neighboring states of Idaho and South Dakota have some of the country’s most restrictive abortion laws, banning abortion entirely with limited exceptions. The ballot measure was opposed by several medical groups, including the Montana chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, which said it would have “criminalized doctors, nurses and health care workers for providing compassionate care for infants,” interfered with parents’ challenging decisions, and hindered care for newborns with fatal health conditions.. “Born alive” arguments have been a focus of anti-abortion advocates for decades. (A 2002 federal law, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, already classifies every infant as a person.) And Ziegler sees the Montana referendum as more of a “rhetorical tool” aimed at stigmatizing abortion than as an effort to directly restrict abortion access. But the results of the referendum could be a signal to anti-abortion advocates that pursuing ballot measures might not be an effective strategy moving forward. Voters in more conservative states might not be willing to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution yet—as voters in Vermont, Michigan and California did this week. But this outcome suggests they’re also not willing to support as many restrictions as anti-abortion advocates had hoped. “I think it does tell you that most voters—even in red states, and certainly in purple and blue states—are unhappy with what’s going on with abortion rights,” Ziegler says. “To some degree, Republicans overplayed their hand.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/"},"headline":"Voters Rejected Montana’s Anti-Abortion Referendum. Here’s What it Means","datePublished":"2022-11-10T23:06:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:02:15.929Z","description":"Montana was one of five states with abortion-related ballot measures on Tuesday, and in all cases, voters chose to protect abortion access.","url":"https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/","keywords":["2022 Midterm Elections","abortion","Second click","nationpod"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb23b8cd4105ecb25/698a37c3e6e84af4bd2af8ee/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Katie Reilly","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb23b8cd4105ecb25/698a37c3e6e84af4bd2af8ee/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Abortion rights activist holds a placard saying, Vote for","caption":"Abortion rights activist holds a placard saying, Vote for","creditText":"Jeremy Hogan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/2022-midterm-elections/","name":"2022 Midterm Elections"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6232659/montana-abortion-referendum-fails-midterms-2022/","name":"Voters Rejected Montana’s Anti-Abortion Referendum. Here’s What it Means"}}]}] ```