--- title: The Problem With Polling Ahead of the 2022 Midterm Elections description: Polls have given Democrats too much of a leg up in recent cycles. And there may be more garbage data in the stream. canonical: https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-10-21T18:40:49.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-14T09:40:57.904Z article:section: Politics og:title: Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely og:description: Polls have given Democrats too much of a leg up in recent cycles. And there may be more garbage data in the stream. og:url: https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4407dd72966a28d7/698a369c86f68e6cf46f1bf5/GettyImages-1240732295.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: North Carolina Holds Midterm Primary Elections og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely twitter:description: Polls have given Democrats too much of a leg up in recent cycles. And there may be more garbage data in the stream. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4407dd72966a28d7/698a369c86f68e6cf46f1bf5/GettyImages-1240732295.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7f454f68-fe83-4e7a-8194-29e972deb1ce&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7f454f68-fe83-4e7a-8194-29e972deb1ce&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=7f454f68-fe83-4e7a-8194-29e972deb1ce&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7f454f68-fe83-4e7a-8194-29e972deb1ce&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Americans Cast Midterm Ballots at Record Rates [Watch (HLS stream): Americans Cast Midterm Ballots at Record Rates](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/BKwn3ZE9.m3u8) (2:24)  _Published 2022-10-21. In 2018, with Donald Trump in the White House and Democrats desperate to regain power in Congress, nearly half of eligible voters cast ballots, achieving the highest turnout rate for a midterm election in more than a century. This year, the turnout could be even higher._  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Oct 21, 2022 6:40 PM UTC In 2018, with Donald Trump in the White House and Democrats desperate to regain power in Congress, nearly half of eligible voters cast ballots, achieving the highest turnout rate for a midterm election in more than a century. This year, the turnout could be even higher.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Oct 21, 2022 6:40 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ For most of any two-year election cycle, but especially as we get closer to Election Day, we are flying blind. Despite all the campaign ads and rehearsed speeches and faux scandals and, in some rare cases, actual [in-person debates](https://time.com/6222878/ohio-senate-debate-2022-hostile/), we don’t know which team is going to do better turning their side out. We don’t like sitting with that uncertainty, so we turn to the political junkie’s drug of choice: polls. Voting began way back in the tail end of summer, when the most aggressive early-voting states of [Minnesota](https://www.vote.org/state/minnesota/) and [South Dakota](https://www.vote.org/state/south-dakota/) started casting ballots in September. The first batch of real results don’t come until after polls close on [Election Day](https://time.com/6219362/midterms-local-races-politics/), and at that point, they come with such ferocity that it’s easy to lose track of surprise wins—and losses—as all 435 [House](https://time.com/6220732/house-races-to-watch-midterms-democrats/) seats, roughly a third of the [Senate](https://time.com/6220060/senate-races-to-watch-midterms-trump/), and three dozen [governorships](https://time.com/6219633/governors-races-to-watch-midterms-trump/) are decided. In lieu, those of us who make careers in the political ecosystem substitute proxies: campaign finance reports, TV ad reservations, digital and social outlays, candidate visits, voter-registration data, even consultant gossip about who’s in and who’s out. But we lean more on polling than any of those other vices. And the problem there is that what should be just another informative input has become treated as predictive. “You’re reading these as tea leaves. They’re hieroglyphics,” one pollster texted me back yesterday. “If you don’t know how to read them, you’re doing major harm.” That’s not an uncommon grievance among polling pros. And for good reason. And I am as guilty as anyone. Public-opinion surveys have become a substitute for actual analysis. Take, for instance, the shift in a recent New York _Times_/ Siena poll’s most-predictive question. When asked who should control Congress next year, Republicans appeared to have a 4-point advantage over Democrats; [read](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/17/upshot/midterms-poll-republicans-lead.html) the actual numbers, it’s closer to 2.5 points. Negligible? Sure. But not entirely a rounding error. Go a little down-stream in the polling numbers, and it gets far dicier. The _Times’_ September [poll](https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2022/10/17/the-poll-that-stirred-the-pot-00062094) showed independent women favoring Democrats by a fulsome 14 points. A month later, they’re backing Republicans by 18 points. That’s an epic 32-point swing, one that is almost impossible to imagine in practice. But then you look at the details; the embedded margin of error for the [small](https://twitter.com/geoffreyvs/status/1582024685159866368) sample size is 20 points. Put simply: they didn’t talk to enough of those independent women to know what they’re talking about, but the rest of us can’t shut up about it. And this is the problem with polling right now: we treat it as Gospel. Polls have [consistently](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/03/midterm-polls-undercount-republicans/)—with the exception of 2012—given Democrats too much of a leg up in recent cycles. Pollsters have missed the turn-out universe by factors of two to eight points. The Trump era contributed to a surge in voters refusing to engage with pollsters, [resulting](https://www.usnews.com/news/elections/articles/2022-10-17/why-is-22-proving-to-be-so-unpredictable-the-old-rules-dont-apply) in bogus numbers. The pros are already [anticipating](https://www.vox.com/2022/9/23/23353634/polls-bias-democrats-midterms) garbage data in the stream. And fickle analysis has left confidence in the polls shaky at best and ruinous in reality. Still, most of the armchair political analysts [look](https://rollcall.com/2022/09/27/for-those-tempted-to-predict-the-midterms-dont/) at the numbers as though they hold answers. Frank talk: they do not. They inform part of the discussion. They spot which campaigns might be toast. The polls can help decide whether a campaign should follow Twitter’s advice and make social justice the hill to die on or to stick with the [economy](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/17/elections-republicans-inflation-crime-polling/). Kitchen-table issues like inflation and gas prices have dinged Democrats plenty hard, but it’s also been a half century since abortion was as in play as it is now. Polling provides some hints as to what is resonating and what isn’t, but no politician who wants to be seen as a leader defaults to what a pollster tells them. In this, Speaker Nancy Pelosi wasn’t wrong when, in recent weeks, she began telling allies that every single race is its own universe with its own peculiarities. National headwinds don’t necessarily [blow](https://time.com/6189438/virginia-primaries-2022/) so hard in the Richmond suburbs, for instance. If the GOP [holds](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/08/us/politics/senate-midterm-elections.html) every seat that was in Trump’s column in 2020 _and_ carries all of the Biden districts that Biden won by five points or less, Republicans will still only have a six-seat majority—hardly a landslide. While there’s plenty—emphasis: plenty—of reason to roll eyes at the assertion that Democrats actually could gain seats this cycle, there’s at least a rational argument that things might not be turn out as dire as national forecasts anticipate. Anecdotally, things don’t _feel_ so despondent out there for liberals, but there’s no real evidence to back that up. At least no evidence beyond the notions fed by polling. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/"},"headline":"Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely","datePublished":"2022-10-21T18:40:49.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-14T09:40:57.904Z","description":"Polls have given Democrats too much of a leg up in recent cycles. And there may be more garbage data in the stream.","url":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","democrats","Congress","Voting","2022 Midterm Elections"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4407dd72966a28d7/698a369c86f68e6cf46f1bf5/GettyImages-1240732295.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4407dd72966a28d7/698a369c86f68e6cf46f1bf5/GettyImages-1240732295.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"North Carolina Holds Midterm Primary Elections","caption":"North Carolina Holds Midterm Primary Elections","creditText":"Sean Rayford—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/","name":"Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Americans Cast Midterm Ballots at Record Rates","description":"In 2018, with Donald Trump in the White House and Democrats desperate to regain power in Congress, nearly half of eligible voters cast ballots, achieving the highest turnout rate for a midterm election in more than a century. This year, the turnout could be even higher.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/BKwn3ZE9/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2022-10-21T20:42:26.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/BKwn3ZE9.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/","duration":"PT2M24S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6223908/problem-with-polling-midterms-2022/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```