--- title: Banning Russian Propaganda Is Harmful for Democracy: Column description: Democracies must understand that, in the digital age, it's impossible to shield citizens from hostile propaganda without compromising the values of democracy. canonical: https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/ author: Jacob Mchangama article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-08-12T18:37:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:36:46.061Z article:section: Ideas og:title: In A War of Ideas, Censorship Is a Lousy One og:description: The EU's ban on Russian propaganda doesn't serve democracy og:url: https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt05ec29d7612483a8/698a3495b3fce34bc30c98c5/sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: In A War of Ideas, Censorship Is a Lousy One twitter:description: The EU's ban on Russian propaganda doesn't serve democracy twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt05ec29d7612483a8/698a3495b3fce34bc30c98c5/sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # In A War of Ideas, Banning Russian Propaganda Does More Harm Than Good > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e0f99c5a-103a-4b30-a01a-37839605b340&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e0f99c5a-103a-4b30-a01a-37839605b340&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=e0f99c5a-103a-4b30-a01a-37839605b340&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Jacob Mchangama](https://time.com/author/jacob-mchangama/) ## Jacob Mchangama Aug 12, 2022 6:37 PM UTC  A man passes a control post of the Russia Today TV company in Moscow, June 2018\. Russian state-controlled media outlets RT and Sputnik will be banned in the European Union, announced European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in February 2022. A man passes a control post of the Russia Today TV company in Moscow, June 2018\. Russian state-controlled media outlets RT and Sputnik will be banned in the European Union, announced European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in February 2022. Yuri Kadobnov—AFP/Getty Images by [Jacob Mchangama](https://time.com/author/jacob-mchangama/) ## Jacob Mchangama Aug 12, 2022 6:37 PM UTC Seven years in prison was the sentence local Moscow politician [ Aleksei Gorinov received](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/07/russia-municipal-councillor-sentenced-to-seven-years-in-jail-for-opposing-the-ukraine-war/) for denouncing the Russian army´s massacre of civilians in Bucha. Other [journalists](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-journalist-protest-marina-ovsyannikova-b2038311.html) and [dissidents](https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/04/22/kremlin-critic-kara-murza-faces-prison-on-war-fakes-charges-a77462) have been detained and charged under the “fake news” [law](https://cpj.org/2022/03/proposed-russian-legislation-threatens-15-years-in-prison-for-fake-information-about-ukraine-invasion/) Russia passed to silence criticism and scrutiny of its war of aggression in Ukraine. But politicians in democratic societies are pushing for censorship as well. A few days after invasion, the European Union [suspended](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022R0350&from=EN) the broadcasting activities of the state-sponsored media outlets Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik on the ground that Russia was [engaging](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32022D0351&from=EN) in a “systematic, international campaign of media manipulation and distortion of facts” that threatened the democratic order in EU member states. On March 4, the European Commission [clarified](https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/26927483) that social media companies “must prevent users from broadcasting…any content of RT and Sputnik” — a clarification broad enough to include content posted by users attempting to counter Russian propaganda. The ban on RT and Sputnik was [upheld](https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-07/cp220132en.pdf) in July by the EU´s General Court, which called necessary to stop a “vehicle for propaganda” in support of Russian “military aggression.” The court held that the temporary nature of the prohibition did not violate the right to freedom of expression. It may be tempting to view the judgment as a “win against Russia.” After all, the core of free speech is to protect the weak against the powerful, not state-sponsored media outlets serving the interests of authoritarian regimes by spreading lies and propaganda. But freedom of expression is a human right that should only be restricted in truly exceptional circumstances, such as when the life of the nation is at risk. Neither EU member states nor the US are at war with Russia. And given the overwhelming [support](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP%5F22%5F2784) for Ukraine and the [unpopularity](https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/06/22/international-attitudes-toward-the-u-s-nato-and-russia-in-a-time-of-crisis/) of Putin in most Western democracies, it is highly doubtful that Russian propaganda is able to persuade large numbers of people that its war of aggression is justified. And history offers numerous examples of emergency speech restrictions threatening the very democracies they were supposed to protect. At the outbreak of World War I, Britain controlled nearly 60 percent of the world’s undersea cable networks, allowing it to establish the world’s [first global system of mass surveillance and censorship](http://www.freespeechhistory.com/2019/12/30/episode-37-expert-opinion-the-history-of-mass-surveillance-with-andreas-marklund/). “Cable censors” filtered traffic running through key nodes, with the aim of covering “all telegrams that touch British territory at any point.” The scope and purpose [quickly expanded](https://books.google.dk/books?id=VFFIEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT273&lpg=PT273&dq=%22any+department+of+human+activity+during+the+war+that+did+not+come+within+the+purview+of+the+cable+censorship%22&source=bl&ots=95yMMZ4Q0k&sig=ACfU3U2dFkpVuHIWoEqfqmvo1Xb8RWgSUg&hl=da&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiF84-1sLX5AhUH16QKHUFXCdsQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=%22any%20department%20of%20human%20activity%20during%20the%20war%20that%20did%20not%20come%20within%20the%20purview%20of%20the%20cable%20censorship%22&f=false) to the point where there was hardly “any department of human activity during the war that did not come within the purview of the cable censorship.” This included waging war on “rumors, propaganda and misinformation.” But the telegraph was also used to disseminate propaganda, with censors and journalists often working side by side to curate pro-British viewpoints on the global stage. After the war ended, cable censorship proved too addictive to ditch. It was repurposed to counter anti-colonial dissent throughout the British empire. The United States also resorted to systematic censorship during World War I. The [Espionage Act](https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1045/espionage-act-of-1917) banned a long list of false information deemed harmful to US war efforts, sending droves of anti-war activists — and even a [presidential candidate](https://www.nytimes.com/1921/12/24/archives/harding-frees-debs-and-23-others-held-for-war-violations-socialist.html) — to prison for peaceful opposition to US participation in the war. The government even created a censorship board to filter all communication between the US and foreign countries and to prevent “false” and “demoralizing” statements. By the end of the war, the [board had compiled](https://books.google.dk/books?id=EVwMJlhJXbMC&q=censorship+board#v=snippet&q=censorship%20board&f=false) a list of the names and addresses of more than 250,000 potential suspects. After World War II, the UN held an [international Conference on Freedom of Information](https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3806839) tasked with developing global standards, a consensus having formed that propaganda and false information constituted a threat to world peace. But the East Bloc, led by the USSR, was adamant that true freedom of information and the press required government control and censorship to combat “Fascist or aggressive propaganda, or the dissemination of false or distorted news.” The US, as leader of the democratic West, rejected restrictions and underlined the importance of free speech and access to information as the best remedy against propaganda and fake news. But there were also differences of opinion that prefigured today’s debate. Princeton professor John B. Whitton [argued](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/united-nations-conference-on-freedom-of-information-and-the-movement-against-international-propaganda/871C8E7A8992F8EEA7256D8EE2330B9A) that a John Stuart Mill-style belief approach to free speech “may have been sound a hundred years ago, \[but\] they are of very doubtful validity in the age of the short-wave radio and the ‘beamed’ program of subversive and revolutionary propaganda.” The celebrated First Amendment theorist and Harvard professor Zechariah Chafee [strongly disagreed](https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2423&context=lcp). “We never know that a statement is false,” he argued, “but only that the tribunal decides it is false.” Chafee maintained that establishing truth was “a task for a historian and not for a law court.” The same holds true in our digital age, with all the propaganda and disinformation swirling online. Freedom of expression protects not only the right of the speaker, after all, but also the right of a reader, viewer or listener to access information. One problem with the EU’s strategy is that it impedes the [online collaborative efforts](https://time.com/6155869/bellingcat-eliot-higgins-ukraine-open-source-intelligence/) that not only document Russian war crimes, but that also [expose](https://time.com/6150884/ukraine-russia-attack-open-source-intelligence/) and debunk Russian propaganda and disinformation in real-time. Digital forensic reporters such as [Bellingcat](https://www.bellingcat.com/) and [Oryx](https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/) rely on open sources — including Russian media — to find nuggets of information that can be pieced together to provide a more accurate picture of what is happening on the ground. This includes providing evidence of [war crimes](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bellingcat-tiktok-ukraine-60-minutes-2022-05-15/) and [horrific human rights](https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2022/08/05/tracking-the-faceless-killers-who-mutilated-and-executed-a-ukrainian-pow/) abuses. Banning such access to information [may thus hurt](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2022/04/14/why-a-push-to-exclude-russian-state-media-would-be-problematic-for-free-speech-and-democracy/) those most likely to effectively combat Russian propaganda. What’s more, when modern democracies censor, they provide legitimacy to censorship by authoritarian regimes. In March, Russia [cut access](https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/russia-restricts-access-bbc-russian-service-radio-liberty-ria-2022-03-04/) to Western state-sponsored media such as the BBC and Deutsche Welle whom the Kremlin accused of spreading “false information” and “anti-Russian” views about the war in Ukraine. After the General Court upheld the EU´s ban of RT and Sputnik a Kremlin spokesperson [responded](https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220727-russian-anger-after-eu-court-upholds-ban-on-rt), “Of course, we will take similar measures of pressure on Western media that operate in our country” and added, that “Europeans are trampling on their own ideals.” Democracies must understand that, in the digital age, it’s impossible to effectively shield citizens from hostile propaganda and disinformation without compromising the egalitarian and liberal values of democracy. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/"},"headline":"In A War of Ideas, Banning Russian Propaganda Does More Harm Than Good","datePublished":"2022-08-12T18:37:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:36:46.061Z","description":"The EU's ban on Russian propaganda doesn't serve democracy.","url":"https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/","keywords":["russia"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt05ec29d7612483a8/698a3495b3fce34bc30c98c5/sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jacob Mchangama","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jacob-mchangama/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt05ec29d7612483a8/698a3495b3fce34bc30c98c5/sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"sputnik-rt-russian-outlets-censorship","caption":"A man passes a control post of the Russia Today TV company in Moscow, June 2018. Russian state-controlled media outlets RT and Sputnik will be banned in the European Union, announced European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in February 2022.","creditText":"Yuri Kadobnov—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/russia/","name":"russia"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6205645/russian-propaganda-censorship-history/","name":"In A War of Ideas, Banning Russian Propaganda Does More Harm Than Good"}}]}] ```