--- title: Why Don't We Have a COVID-19 Variant Called Pi? description: Newer SARS-CoV-2 variants have been considered relatives of Omicron. Here's why we don't yet have a Pi variant in the COVID-19 pandemic. canonical: https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/ author: Jamie Ducharme article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-07-15T16:05:56.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:30:21.935Z article:section: Health og:title: Why We Don't Have a Pi Variant Yet—Even After So Much Omicron og:description: The Greek alphabet and COVID-19 variants aren't always in sync og:url: https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3a80a48cf1365a76/698a33bd86f68e19196f16bf/SARs-CoV-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Coronavirus Illustration og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why We Don't Have a Pi Variant Yet—Even After So Much Omicron twitter:description: The Greek alphabet and COVID-19 variants aren't always in sync twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3a80a48cf1365a76/698a33bd86f68e19196f16bf/SARs-CoV-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why We Don't Have a Pi Variant Yet—Even After So Much Omicron > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f5b559fe-1fc5-4185-bb4c-369002df23f0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f5b559fe-1fc5-4185-bb4c-369002df23f0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=f5b559fe-1fc5-4185-bb4c-369002df23f0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f5b559fe-1fc5-4185-bb4c-369002df23f0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/)  ## Jamie Ducharme Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Jul 15, 2022 4:05 PM UTC  An illustration of SARS-CoV-2 created at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An illustration of SARS-CoV-2 created at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/Alissa Eckert, MSMI, Dan Higgins, MAMS/Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images  by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/)  ## Jamie Ducharme Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Jul 15, 2022 4:05 PM UTC In May 2021, [the World Health Organization (WHO) announced](https://www.who.int/news/item/31-05-2021-who-announces-simple-easy-to-say-labels-for-sars-cov-2-variants-of-interest-and-concern) that key variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, would be assigned names from the Greek alphabet, in addition to their scientific designations, to give people around the world a simple, non-stigmatizing way to talk about them. (Previously and problematically, variants were often referred to depending on where they were first detected.) That system led to household names like Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. But after Omicron was first detected in late 2021, variants started to sound a lot more technical, with names like [BA.2](https://time.com/6160259/ba2-covid-19-surge/), [BA.2.12.1](https://time.com/6174005/ba-2-12-1-variant-covid-19/), [BA.4](https://time.com/6187762/ba-4-ba-5-omicron-subvariants-symptoms-risk/), [BA.5](https://time.com/6193890/ba-5-omicron-dominant/), and, most recently, BA.2.75\. Why all these complex names when there’s still no variant known as Pi? All along, there have been far more SARS-CoV-2 variants than have gotten Greek names; the WHO assigns alphabetical names only to variants of concern that are significantly different from previous ones. “At the time Omicron was emerging, there were hundreds of sublineages of Delta that we were tracking,” explains Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s technical lead for COVID-19\. Compared to those, Omicron represented a drastic shift in the virus’ evolution, with a “substantial” number of mutations, Van Kerkhove says. As we now know, those mutations made Omicron more contagious but a bit less severe than Delta. While there are differences between BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, and the rest of the Omicron subvariants, they’re all fairly similar to each other and the original Omicron strain. That’s why they’re considered descendants of Omicron rather than their own distinct variants with different Greek names to match, Van Kerkhove says. But some experts think that system needs an update. Trevor Bedford, a professor in the vaccine and infectious disease division at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, says it would be better to give significant subvariants names of their own, at least from a public communications perspective. When you say “‘Omicron subvariant BA.2.12.1,’ people tune out,” Bedford says. The evolutionary jump from Delta to Omicron was large, and the virus may not change that dramatically again for years—if ever, Bedford says. So, in his opinion, there should be a lower bar for assigning new alphabetical names. [BA.2 was about 30% more transmissible](https://time.com/6143069/new-omicron-variant-ba2/) than the original Omicron strain, he points out, which was a meaningful shift. BA.5, our current tormentor in the U.S., seems to be the most contagious yet. “If you have a variant that is driving a sizable epidemic in multiple places throughout the world,” Bedford says, “it’s easy to give these a label and would help with everyone understanding what’s going on.” Van Kerkhove stresses that the WHO still considers and treats Omicron relatives as variants of concern, even if they haven’t been assigned new names. She adds that scientists around the world continue to monitor the virus’ evolution—but that’s getting increasingly difficult because [testing and surveillance efforts have fallen by the wayside](https://time.com/6168809/at-home-covid-19-test-results-should-i-report/) as many countries relax pandemic precautions and home testing grows more popular. But that doesn’t mean the virus has stopped mutating. There were 5.7 million cases reported globally last week alone, Van Kerkhove notes. Widespread transmission means not only that lots of people will get sick and potentially die, but also that the virus will have chances to keep mutating—perhaps into yet more gradations of Omicron, or perhaps into a variant different enough to earn the label of Pi. “The virus is under pressure to change,” Van Kerkhove says. “We should be prepared for subtle changes…but we \[also\] have to be prepared for a completely different virus.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/"},"headline":"Why We Don't Have a Pi Variant Yet—Even After So Much Omicron","datePublished":"2022-07-15T16:05:56.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:30:21.935Z","description":"The Greek alphabet and COVID-19 variants aren't always in sync","url":"https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/","keywords":["COVID-19","COVID Questions","healthscienceclimate"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3a80a48cf1365a76/698a33bd86f68e19196f16bf/SARs-CoV-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jamie Ducharme","jobTitle":"Ducharme is a contributor to TIME.","url":"https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3a80a48cf1365a76/698a33bd86f68e19196f16bf/SARs-CoV-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Coronavirus Illustration","caption":"Coronavirus Illustration","creditText":"CDC/Alissa Eckert, MSMI, Dan Higgins, MAMS/Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6197597/who-names-covid-19-variants-pi/","name":"Why We Don't Have a Pi Variant Yet—Even After So Much Omicron"}}]}] ```