--- title: The Supreme Court Should Not Favor an Abortion 'Compromise' description: Alexis McGill Johnson of Planned Parenthood and Anthony D. Romero of the ACU write that abortion opponents are making a states' rights argument that could have far-reaching effects if the Supreme Court accepts it. canonical: https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-12-16T21:21:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:06:46.516Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Serious Threat of a 'Mississippi Compromise' on Abortion og:description: "There is simply no way to pull one thread without risk of unraveling the entire tapestry." og:url: https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c39ebd6aae8f5f6/698a20ce86f68ed6596f0b8f/Mississippi-Compromise.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: Supreme Court Hears Mississippi Abortion Case og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Serious Threat of a 'Mississippi Compromise' on Abortion twitter:description: "There is simply no way to pull one thread without risk of unraveling the entire tapestry." twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c39ebd6aae8f5f6/698a20ce86f68ed6596f0b8f/Mississippi-Compromise.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A 'Mississippi Compromise' on Abortion Would Threaten All Our Freedoms ## Video: True Stories, Hard Choices: Part 1 [Watch (HLS stream): True Stories, Hard Choices: Part 1](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/fF6xepgj.m3u8) (12:23)  _Published 2016-09-28. Filmmaker Dawn Porter looks at the racial politics of abortion in America today._ by [Alexis McGill Johnson](https://time.com/author/alexis-mcgill-johnson/) and [Anthony D. Romero](https://time.com/author/anthony-d-romero/) Dec 16, 2021 9:21 PM UTC  Activists with The Center for Popular Democracy Action hold photos of U.S. Supreme Court justices as they block an intersection during a demonstration in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, a case about a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks. With the addition of conservative justices to the court by former President Donald Trump, experts believe this could be the most important abortion case in decades and could undermine or overturn Roe v. Wade. Activists with The Center for Popular Democracy Action hold photos of U.S. Supreme Court justices as they block an intersection during a demonstration in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, a case about a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks. With the addition of conservative justices to the court by former President Donald Trump, experts believe this could be the most important abortion case in decades and could undermine or overturn Roe v. Wade.Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images—2021 Getty Images by [Alexis McGill Johnson](https://time.com/author/alexis-mcgill-johnson/) and [Anthony D. Romero](https://time.com/author/anthony-d-romero/) Dec 16, 2021 9:21 PM UTC The last 100-plus days of [a ban on most abortions after six weeks in Texas](https://time.com/6093905/texas-abortion-ban-abortion-rights/) have made painfully clear the future anti-abortion extremists want, not just in Texas, but across the country. And now a majority of Supreme Court Justices, [having failed to put an end to Texas’s ban](https://time.com/6121289/supreme-court-lets-texas-abortion-law-stand/), seem poised to [let Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban stand](https://time.com/6124416/supreme-court-abortion-oral-arguments-mississippi/) or perhaps even to reverse Roe v. Wade completely. We are headed toward a world in which our zip codes will determine our freedom, [our right to control our bodies](https://time.com/6074553/abortion-supreme-court-limbo/) and our ability to make decisions about our future. That’s why the line of reasoning we heard from the Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart –– and the line of questioning from Justice Brett Kavanaugh — during oral arguments in [_Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health_ ](https://time.com/6048930/supreme-court-mississippi-abortion-roe-v-wade/)was so alarming. Abortion opponents are explicitly making a states’ rights argument against the right to access abortion, telling the Court that it is a “compromise” to overrule nearly 50 years of enshrined law, and to leave decisions about our rights up to the states. This is a new bargain for our bodies: the Mississippi Compromise. Why does this feel so familiar? Because we’ve been here before. When given the opportunity, states have often played with definitions of humanity for political expediency, to bolster their power, or to confer an advantage on a specific group. Historically, they call these power grabs “compromises” — but every time, they’ve been at the expense of freedom. [As Justice Sonia Sotomayor made clear](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-463%5F3ebh.pdf), the Texas law “echoes the philosophy of John C. Calhoun, a virulent defender of the slaveholding South who insisted that States had the right to ‘veto’ or ‘nullif\[y\]’ any federal law with which they disagreed.” **_Read More:_**[_Inside Mississippi’s Last Abortion Clinic—and the Biggest Fight for Abortion Rights in a Generation_](https://time.com/6116072/mississippi-abortion-supreme-court-jackson-womens-health/) So-called “compromises” about abortion are being made at the same time that Texas and other state lawmakers have implemented some of the most egregious [voting restrictions](https://time.com/6083223/texas-democrats-washington-voting-rights/) and civil rights violations. They’re systematically stripping people — particularly women, Black, Latino and Indigenous communities, people with low incomes, and the LGBTQ+ community — of their freedoms. For more than two-thirds of American history, this country has failed to confer full rights on women and people of color. If the Supreme Court empowers states to decide who is free and who is not, then once again, people’s bodies will count toward representation and political power, but their voices — which are calling for freedom, full citizenship, the ballot and bodily autonomy — will be silenced through [gerrymandered legislative maps](https://time.com/6109213/texas-redistricting-lawsuit-history/) and [attacks on voting rights](https://time.com/5954792/voting-rights-moral-issue/). This has never been about the will of the people. It’s about who controls the levers of power. And it’s no coincidence that the [architects](https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2021/10/01/this-group-helped-dream-up-texas-vigilante-abortion-ban/) of the most egregious abortion bans are also behind attacks on same-sex marriage, bills that target trans youth, and challenges to COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They’ve set fires everywhere to keep us preoccupied as they systematically dismantle our institutions. In the last decade, we’ve witnessed the [decimation of the Voting Rights Act](https://time.com/6077449/supreme-court-voting-rights/), the rise of disinformation, and an [onslaught](https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2021/07/state-policy-trends-midyear-2021-already-worst-legislative-year-ever-us-abortion) of abortion restrictions. **_Read More:_**[_What We Fear in the Wake of the Texas Abortion Law_](https://time.com/6101739/abortion-access-alabama/) Anti-abortion policies force people to continue their pregnancy, while the same politicians simultaneously shred the social safety net. Taken together, these attacks will send more people into the trap of debt and [poverty](https://www.ansirh.org/research/ongoing/turnaway-study), while limiting women’s ability to direct their own lives. At the same time, they’re forcing disenfranchisement, gerrymandering us out of meaningful representation and instituting undemocratic voting restrictions. They intend to strip us of our rights, as part of a broader agenda designed to consolidate power. Because let’s be clear: we can’t vote our way out of this if we can’t vote. We can’t make our voices heard if we can’t [freely assemble and protest](https://www.npr.org/2021/04/19/988791175/florida-adopts-nations-toughest-restrictions-on-protests). We can’t teach our children how we got here if schools are banned from [honestly discussing history.](https://time.com/6075193/critical-race-theory-debate/) There’s much more at stake than just our right to abortion –– every liberty interest under the Fourteenth Amendment is on the line. If the states can decide if you can have an abortion, it would open the door for states to decide whom you can marry –– or whether contraception is available to you, and what kind. If _Roe_ can be overruled, why not _Griswold_ or [_Obergefell_](https://time.com/5324824/supreme-court-anthony-kennedy-obergefell/)? There is simply no way to pull one thread without risk of unraveling the entire tapestry. **Read More:** [_Inside The Small Group of Doctors Who Risked Everything to Provide Abortions in Texas_](https://time.com/6106537/texas-doctors-performing-abortions-ban-halted/) Take nothing for granted: because in a world where politics trump precedent, there are no safe states. That rage you feel? That’s your power. Use it. The courts may not save us. But our freedom and dignity are not up for debate. There is no compromising on basic human rights. We will not go back. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/"},"headline":"A 'Mississippi Compromise' on Abortion Would Threaten All Our Freedoms","datePublished":"2021-12-16T21:21:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:06:46.516Z","description":"Alexis McGill Johnson of Planned Parenthood and Anthony D. Romero of the ACU write that abortion opponents are making a states' rights argument that could have far-reaching effects if the Supreme Court accepts it.","url":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/","keywords":["politics","freelance","nationpod"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c39ebd6aae8f5f6/698a20ce86f68ed6596f0b8f/Mississippi-Compromise.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alexis McGill Johnson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alexis-mcgill-johnson/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Anthony D. Romero","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/anthony-d-romero/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c39ebd6aae8f5f6/698a20ce86f68ed6596f0b8f/Mississippi-Compromise.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Supreme Court Hears Mississippi Abortion Case","caption":"Supreme Court Hears Mississippi Abortion Case","creditText":"Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images—2021 Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/","name":"A 'Mississippi Compromise' on Abortion Would Threaten All Our Freedoms"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"True Stories, Hard Choices: Part 1","description":"Filmmaker Dawn Porter looks at the racial politics of abortion in America today.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/fF6xepgj/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-09-28T20:39:55.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/fF6xepgj.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/","duration":"PT12M23S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6129401/abortion-compromise-supreme-court-mississippi/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```