--- title: What Does it Mean to Recover from Addiction? description: Most people who are addicted to drugs or alcohol recover without any treatment or self-help groups, and many don't quit entirely. canonical: https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/ author: Maia Szalavitz article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-09-29T18:43:36.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T10:21:35.372Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Rethinking What it Means to Recover from Addiction og:description: 'There’s another way to reconcile conflicting views of recovery: simply define it for yourself' og:url: https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt696b6c4f236c0112/698a1d59656a3f1cedbdbacd/GettyImages-1296901839.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2159 og:image:height: 1214 og:image:alt: White book with black letters word Recovery written on it og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Rethinking What it Means to Recover from Addiction twitter:description: 'There’s another way to reconcile conflicting views of recovery: simply define it for yourself' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt696b6c4f236c0112/698a1d59656a3f1cedbdbacd/GettyImages-1296901839.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Rethinking What it Means to Recover from Addiction > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2c9125d4-52fd-4a50-931c-1829976d7b5c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2c9125d4-52fd-4a50-931c-1829976d7b5c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=2c9125d4-52fd-4a50-931c-1829976d7b5c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Maia Szalavitz](https://time.com/author/maia-szalavitz/) ## Maia Szalavitz Sep 29, 2021 6:43 PM UTC  If we don’t start to view recovery more inclusively, we are denying hope and healing to those who benefit from approaches other than the 12 steps. If we don’t start to view recovery more inclusively, we are denying hope and healing to those who benefit from approaches other than the 12 steps. Getty Images by [Maia Szalavitz](https://time.com/author/maia-szalavitz/) ## Maia Szalavitz Sep 29, 2021 6:43 PM UTC When I kicked cocaine and heroin in 1988, I was told that there was only one way to get better: abstain forever from psychoactive substances including alcohol—and practice the 12 steps made famous by Alcoholics Anonymous. The only alternative, counselors and group members said, was “jails, institutions or death.” My addiction was so extreme that by the end, I was injecting dozens of times a day. So I grabbed the lifeline I was thrown and attended the traditional 12-step rehab program recommended by the hospital where I underwent withdrawal. But once I began to study the scientific data on addiction, I learned that these claims were not accurate. In fact, research shows that [most people](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/31/opinion/addiction-recovery-survivors.html) who meet full diagnostic criteria for having an addiction to [alcohol or other drugs](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227547/) recover without any treatment or self-help groups—and many do so not by quitting entirely, but by [moderating](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15733237/) their use so that it no longer interferes with their productivity or relationships. There is no “one true way” to end addiction—and the idea that “one size fits all” can be harmful and even deadly in some cases. Until we recognize this and celebrate the variety of recovery experiences, September’s National Recovery Month and similar efforts to promote healing will fail to reach millions of people who could benefit. During an overdose crisis that [killed more than 90,000 people](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs%5Fpress%5Freleases/2021/20210714.htm) in 2020 alone, a better understanding of how people really do overcome addiction is essential. Unfortunately, rehab hasn’t improved much since I attended in the late 20th century. At least two-thirds of American addiction treatment programs still focus on [teaching the 12 steps](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt35313/2020%5FNSSATS%5FFINAL.pdf) and promoting lifelong abstinence and meeting attendance as the only way to recover. (The steps themselves include admitting powerlessness over the problem, finding a higher power, making amends for wrongs done, trying to improve “character defects” and prayer—a moral program unlike anything else in medicine.) Moreover, despite the fact that the only treatment that is [proven to cut the death rate](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2780655) from opioid addiction by 50% or more is long-term use of either methadone or buprenorphine, only about one-third of residential programs even [permit](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2760443) these effective medicines, and [around half](https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt35313/2020%5FNSSATS%5FFINAL.pdf) of outpatient facilities use them, typically short-term. Worse: when they do allow medication, most treatment centers also push people with opioid use disorder to attend the 12-step program, Narcotics Anonymous. That creates what can be deadly pressure to stop the meds. The group’s [official literature](https://www.na.org/admin/include/spaw2/uploads/pdf/pr/2306%5Fna%5Fprmat%5F1021.pdf) says that people on methadone or buprenorphine are not “clean” and have only substituted one addiction for another. I have been contacted by more than one family who lost a loved one to overdose because their relative had rejected or prematurely ended medication based on this view. If we don’t start to view recovery more inclusively, we are denying hope and healing to those who benefit from approaches other than the steps. So, what does a more accurate and expansive view of recovery look like? To me, one of the most helpful definitions was devised by a group known as the Chicago Recovery Alliance (CRA), which founded the Windy City’s first needle exchange. CRA was also the first organization in the world to widely distribute the overdose reversal drug naloxone—and train drug users to save each other’s lives by using it. Naloxone (also known as Narcan) is a pure antidote to opioids: it restores the drive to breathe in overdose victims but must be given rapidly to be effective. (If used in error, it is safe: it won’t hurt people with other medical problems and typically works even if opioids have been combined with other drugs.) CRA’s approach is called [harm reduction](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/23/opinion/harm-reduction-covid.html), and it defines recovery as making “any positive change.” This means that anything from starting to use clean needles to becoming completely abstinent counts. From this perspective, if someone quits smoking crack, gets a job and reconciles with her family, she counts as being in recovery—even if she stills smokes marijuana daily. Or, if someone goes from drinking a bottle of Scotch a day to having a daily glass of wine—or from drinking daily to binging only on weekends—these too are positive changes, not just “active addiction.” Here, recovery is a process, not an event. It’s difficult to learn any new skill without trial and error, and this includes developing coping skills to manage or end drug use. For most people, even with behaviors short of addiction, big changes take time. This broad definition obviously includes people who take addiction medications. Doing so is a positive change because it dramatically reduces the risk of death, even for those who continue to take other substances. Moreover, those who do quit nonmedical use and [stabilize](https://www.nap.edu/resource/25310/032019%5FOUDhighlights.pdf) on an appropriate dose of these meds can drive, connect with others and work as well as anyone else. They are not intoxicated or numb—just like people taking other psychiatric drugs as prescribed. While patients on methadone or buprenorphine remain physically dependent on medication to avoid withdrawal, they no longer meet criteria for addiction. According to psychiatry’s diagnostic manual and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, [addiction](https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/drug-misuse-addiction) must include compulsive behavior despite negative outcomes—it’s not simply needing something to function. Of course, for people steeped in traditional abstinence-oriented recovery, CRA’s “any positive change” definition can be challenging. In the 12-step world, members who have maintained continuous abstinence for many years are revered—the longer their time away from alcohol and other drugs, the higher their status tends to be. The lure of such social acclaim helps some avoid relapse. Granting the status of “recovering” to those who have not quit entirely seems unfair from this perspective. However, it could save lives. In 12-step programs, people who break continuous abstinence—even for just one day after 20 years—are seen as returning to square one, and their “sober time” and its associated status is completely erased. Research shows that having such a [binary](http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1868965,00.html) view of recovery can actually make relapses more dangerous. That’s because people figure that, since they’ve blown it already, their small slip might as well be a massive spree. Since most people do relapse at least once, moving away from the idea that only continuous abstinence matters—not quality of life, not the ability to maintain relationships and contribute to society—would likely be healthier for everyone. But there’s another way to reconcile conflicting views of recovery, which preserves traditional ideas for those who prefer them. That is, simply define it for yourself and let others do likewise. If you’ve heard someone identify themselves by saying, “I’m a person in long-term recovery and for me, that means abstinence,” you’ve seen this idea in practice. My own perspective has changed over time. From 1988 through 2001, I was continuously abstinent from drugs other than caffeine, including alcohol. Since then, I have used alcohol and cannabis responsibly, without difficulty. However, I have no illusions that I could moderate either cocaine or heroin use—so I continue to avoid these drugs and count myself among the recovering. Now, though, I suspect that my recovery probably started before my abstinence—when I was taught to use bleach to clean my needles in 1986 and began to fight to get HIV prevention information and equipment to other injectors. That positive change likely helped prepare me for further transformation, including seeking rehab. It almost certainly helped me avoid AIDS. What really matters is not whether someone recovers via medication or moderation or 12-step programs or anything else. It’s that, like me, most people do get better. And even more of us can if we recognize and support many roads to recovery. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/"},"headline":"Rethinking What it Means to Recover from Addiction","datePublished":"2021-09-29T18:43:36.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T10:21:35.372Z","description":"If we don’t start to view recovery more inclusively, we are denying hope and healing to those who benefit from approaches other than the steps.","url":"https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/","keywords":["health"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt696b6c4f236c0112/698a1d59656a3f1cedbdbacd/GettyImages-1296901839.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Maia Szalavitz","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/maia-szalavitz/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt696b6c4f236c0112/698a1d59656a3f1cedbdbacd/GettyImages-1296901839.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"White book with black letters word Recovery written on it","caption":"White book with black letters word Recovery written on it","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6102343/recovering-from-addiction/","name":"Rethinking What it Means to Recover from Addiction"}}]}] ```