--- title: Removing Online Anonymity Won't End Racist Abuse of Athletes description: Outlawing online anonymity and enforcing users to prove their identities is not the recipe for a more respectful and prejudice-free world canonical: https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/ author: Melody Patry article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-07-21T18:25:41.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:52:27.128Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Removing Online Anonymity Won't End Racist Abuse of Athletes og:description: Outlawing online anonymity and enforcing users to prove their identities is not the recipe for a more respectful and prejudice-free world og:url: https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt48ec68fb6a28997f/698a1b2d656a3fad79bdb724/GettyImages-1328872318-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain - Previews og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Removing Online Anonymity Won't End Racist Abuse of Athletes twitter:description: Outlawing online anonymity and enforcing users to prove their identities is not the recipe for a more respectful and prejudice-free world twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt48ec68fb6a28997f/698a1b2d656a3fad79bdb724/GettyImages-1328872318-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Online Anonymity Isn't Driving Abuse of Black Sports Stars. Systemic Racism Is > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8344881c-d4e3-4c09-857c-79c3ab1fc184&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8344881c-d4e3-4c09-857c-79c3ab1fc184&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=8344881c-d4e3-4c09-857c-79c3ab1fc184&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Melody Patry](https://time.com/author/melody-patry/) ## Melody Patry Jul 21, 2021 6:25 PM UTC  Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain and Mercedes GP looks on as the prototype for the 2022 F1 season is unveiled during previews ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain at Silverstone on July 15, 2021 in Northampton, England Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain and Mercedes GP looks on as the prototype for the 2022 F1 season is unveiled during previews ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain at Silverstone on July 15, 2021 in Northampton, England Michael Regan—Getty Images by [Melody Patry](https://time.com/author/melody-patry/) ## Melody Patry Jul 21, 2021 6:25 PM UTC On Sunday, Formula One driver [Lewis Hamilton was racially abused on social media](https://news.sky.com/story/lewis-hamilton-receives-racist-abuse-after-celebrating-silverstone-win-while-max-verstappen-was-still-in-hospital-12358585) after winning the British Grand Prix. It was just the latest in a series of noxious incidents where Black athletes in the U.K. have been targeted by racists online following high-profile sporting events. How the athletes themselves perform doesn’t seem to matter. As writer and podcaster Kelechi Okafor put it in a [haiku on Twitter](https://twitter.com/kelechnekoff/status/1417132241214398467?s=20), for many people of colour on the internet, and especially Black people, “Win or Lose The Outcome Is Abuse”. After Black soccer players drew attention to the abuse they regularly receive several months ago, teams and players staged a [four-day boycott of social media](https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/apr/24/footballers-to-boycott-social-media-in-mass-protest-over-racist-abuse) demanding, among other policy changes, that social media platforms implement real-name policies, outlawing the anonymity that allows bigots to spout their vile rhetoric online in total impunity. An online [petition](https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/575833) making that demand received almost 700,000 signatures. High profile athletes are now [raising the idea again](https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/15585855/harry-maguire-social-media-giants-bosses-making-easy-vile-racists-online/). It might sound tempting. But outlawing online anonymity and enforcing users to prove their identities is not the secret recipe for a more respectful, equal, and prejudice-free world. Not only would it fail to eliminate racism, it would also put many people around the world at risk. For human rights defenders, lawyers, dissidents, journalists and whistleblowers, anonymity is a shield that allows them to expose injustice and preserve the truth with a reduced risk of persecution. This week’s outrageous [revelations of state-sponsored surveillance abuse](https://time.com/6081433/pegasus-spyware-monitored-journalists-activists/) by the Israeli spyware firm NSO Group, and the leaking of a 50,000-strong list of potential targets, lays the global scale of governments’ tracking out to bear. When your government is out to get you, anonymity online isn’t a privilege, it is a lifeline. **Read more**: [_Black Soccer Players Are Being Racially Abused on Social Media. How Can the Platforms Do Better?_](https://time.com/6079964/england-footballers-racist-abuse-social-media/) If social media companies and governments forced users to reveal their legal identity it would cause severe harm, particularly to those already most at-risk — such as people of colour, women, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. For many people who have long been excluded from physical and online spaces, or who are already marginalised and targeted, anonymity is a tool of survival. [Access Now’s Digital Security Helpline](https://www.accessnow.org/help/) was recently working with a media outlet focusing on news for the LGBTQ+ community. Their audience comes mostly from places where merely existing outside the heteronorm is criminalized, and where the risk of physical attacks—whether from state actors or neighbours—is immense. For these people to engage with the media, express themselves, and share information relatively safely online, anonymous accounts are the only option. Similarly, survivors of domestic violence [have found safe places online](https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/issue/gender/all/cultivating-violence-through-technology) thanks to their ability to connect and exchange while preserving their identity. There is a [plethora of research and testimonies](https://jilliancyork.com/2021/01/14/everything-old-is-new-part-2-why-online-anonymity-matters/) showing how for millions of people, anonymity online is essential to individual safety, and a facilitator of freedom. There’s also plenty of evidence that shows banning anonymity to encourage “civility” online simply [does not work](https://www.accessnow.org/access-intervenes-at-ecthr-for-the-right-to-be-anonymous-online/). When the Republic of Korea attempted a real-name policy in 2007, it left the government with lackluster results, proving to be ineffective at preventing “abusive” comments, with only a 0.9 percent decrease after one year. Just like offline spaces, many abusers online proudly share their real identities, or don’t actively try to conceal who they are. Anonymity isn’t the problem here; racism is. To truly create impact, we must look into the incentives that encourage people to hate, and be hateful online: if not anonymity, what — and who — ignites the flames? We don’t have to start from scratch — there have already been [numerous studies exploring hateful rhetoric, especially from politicians and high profile figures](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/04/09/how-hateful-rhetoric-connects-to-real-world-violence/), and the role it plays in inciting violence, whether it manifests on or offline. Social media platforms have more to do, too. Automated amplification has also played a role in emphasising incendiary content and companies still have a long way to go to provide transparency in ranking algorithms so we make sure as a society that hatred is not being actively promoted for clicks. Likewise, review by and appropriate training of human moderators for flagged content is key. We have the know-how, we just need the will. So let’s stop focusing on the wrong things. Blaming the Internet for racism and other societal issues that predate it is an easy way to avoid accountability. Hoping that we can [“instagram our way out of racism”](https://www.instagram.com/p/CRRN5m3MMq6/) by banning anonymous accounts, or sharing a black square on our feed, is techno-solutionism. It is also reductionist in that it negates the oppressing systems at play. Finally, it offers a convenient distraction for politicians — or heads of sports federations, universities, or other institutions — who don’t want to address the root of the problem: systemic racism. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/"},"headline":"Online Anonymity Isn't Driving Abuse of Black Sports Stars. Systemic Racism Is","datePublished":"2021-07-21T18:25:41.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:52:27.128Z","description":"Forcing social media users to provide I.D. hurts people who genuinely need to stay anonymous, and won't help solve racism","url":"https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/","keywords":["Technology","Tech"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt48ec68fb6a28997f/698a1b2d656a3fad79bdb724/GettyImages-1328872318-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Melody Patry","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/melody-patry/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt48ec68fb6a28997f/698a1b2d656a3fad79bdb724/GettyImages-1328872318-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain - Previews","caption":"F1 Grand Prix of Great Britain - Previews","creditText":"Michael Regan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6082318/social-media-abuse-online-anonymity/","name":"Online Anonymity Isn't Driving Abuse of Black Sports Stars. Systemic Racism Is"}}]}] ```