--- title: The Real Congress is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV description: I’ve long argued that most members of Congress, any Administration and most White Houses aren’t as extreme as the coverage of the capital suggests. canonical: https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-02-19T18:41:06.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T09:42:53.093Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Real Congress is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV og:description: I’ve long argued that most members of Congress, any Administration and most White Houses aren’t as extreme as the coverage of the capital suggests. og:url: https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte2a21dfba197e778/698a1760b21a9c77845048e6/congress-capitol-washington.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: US Capitol Building Riot Aftermath og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Real Congress is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV twitter:description: I’ve long argued that most members of Congress, any Administration and most White Houses aren’t as extreme as the coverage of the capital suggests. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte2a21dfba197e778/698a1760b21a9c77845048e6/congress-capitol-washington.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Real Congress Is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=45bc7bd8-5197-4841-acf3-a8bd06008a35&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=45bc7bd8-5197-4841-acf3-a8bd06008a35&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=45bc7bd8-5197-4841-acf3-a8bd06008a35&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Feb 19, 2021 6:41 PM UTC  The Capitol Building on Jan. 11, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Capitol Building on Jan. 11, 2021 in Washington, DC. Kent Nishimura—Los Angeles Times/Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Feb 19, 2021 6:41 PM UTC _This article is part of the The DC Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/newsletter%5Fopt-in?qs=3a19a0aa35903a2d9f214b74f69a37910b58de73cf3f2b89adc123fac024f0478c72f91010ae9d01f08f46c616068cab3e74726837cd2cce70dac3796e46c2b4) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox every weekday._ During normal times, when I’m visiting family and friends outside of Washington, the one question I am sure will always be asked is some variation of _Are they really as crazy as they seem on TV?_ And my reply is always a negative. My friends roll their eyes in skepticism and lament the lack of a fictional politician like [Jeff Smith](https://www.tcm.com/video/116189/mr-smith-goes-to-washington-senator-jefferson-smith/), [Jack Tanner](https://www.vox.com/culture/21377232/tanner-88-hbo-didion-review) or [Jed Bartlett](https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20201023-how-the-west-wing-foreshadowed-the-obama-era). Then I do my best to steer the conversation away from politics. I’ve long argued that most members of Congress, any Administration and most White Houses aren’t as extreme as the coverage of the capital suggests. The vast majority are closet idealists who come to D.C. to do good, fix problems and push their pet projects. They caught the bug for service and decided to split their time between home and decidedly unglamorous shared housing in Washington. Maybe they get quasi-semi-famous, which then lets them push their agenda with a juiced-up microphone. But my argument usually falls on deaf ears due to a handful of disdainful figures who think _House of Cards_ was a workable strategy memo. Drama is entertaining. A bipartisan mark-up of a water bill is not. It’s actually about as interesting as watching a puddle dry. Which is why the real work in Congress of taking ideas, making them into legislation that can pass and then sending them to the White House to implement gets far less attention than partisan attacks and clever memes. Which brings me to a [summary](https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/02/46218-news-transcripts-show-ideologically-extreme-politicians-get-more-airtime/?utm%5Fsource=CJR+Daily+News&utm%5Fcampaign=ea7aca8492-EMAIL%5FCAMPAIGN%5F2020%5F11%5F11%5F06%5F33%5FCOPY%5F01&utm%5Fmedium=email&utm%5Fterm=0%5F9c93f57676-ea7aca8492-174336341&mc%5Fcid=ea7aca8492&mc%5Feid=c76ab3671a) of a series of ongoing research projects from scholars at Louisiana State, the University of Mobile and Texas A&M. Their research, based on more than 46,000 network and cable transcripts from 2005 to 2013, finds that the producers and anchors of shows on the six major broadcast and cable networks highlight the extremes on both the left and right. The middle—where much of the country sits ideologically—often gets lost. Americans recognize less and less of themselves on TV, and Congress is typically portrayed as a coven of extremism. You wouldn’t know it from watching these broadcasts—or the broader hand-wringing about the divided country—but the center-right stasis in America is pretty strong. Pew [research](https://news.gallup.com/poll/328367/americans-political-ideology-held-steady-2020.aspx) finds moderates and conservatives are roughly the same share of the nation’s voters. About 35% of Americans identified as moderate in 2020, compared with 36% as conservative. The lawmakers in Washington representing this large middle ground may be doing a good job at responsible governance, but they make for lousy TV. Having the hard numbers about the fringes’ dominance to confirm my hunch helps my case that, no, Congress isn’t broken. But the national media covering it does reward bad behavior. And that has a trickle-down effect to local news consumers. Local newsrooms are [half](https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/20/u-s-newsroom-employment-has-dropped-by-a-quarter-since-2008/) the size as they were in 2008, and the result is Americans are getting their information about politics from national outlets, including the broadcast and cable networks. Treating the news like entertainment has consequences and it has pushed each side’s extremes further afield as they chase buzz. The scholars reach this conclusion with about as clean a statement as I can imagine: “The Congress that people see on their televisions is not the same one, ideologically, that exists in the Capitol Building,” they write. (The study is behind a firewall for the Journal of Communication, but many libraries have access to it via the Oxford University Press Journals database. The headline? “As Seen on TV? How Gatekeeping Makes the U.S. House Seem More Extreme.” A public-facing summary is [here](https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/02/46218-news-transcripts-show-ideologically-extreme-politicians-get-more-airtime/?utm%5Fsource=CJR+Daily+News&utm%5Fcampaign=ea7aca8492-EMAIL%5FCAMPAIGN%5F2020%5F11%5F11%5F06%5F33%5FCOPY%5F01&utm%5Fmedium=email&utm%5Fterm=0%5F9c93f57676-ea7aca8492-174336341&mc%5Fcid=ea7aca8492&mc%5Feid=c76ab3671a).) The [argument](https://time.com/5879641/democrats-nomination-moderate-ticket/) for a return to American centrism helped Joe Biden win the Democratic nomination over more progressive firebrands like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. Democrats, wanting more than anything to defeat Donald Trump, went with the most middle-of-the-road white guy they could find. (Later, the party’s left wing was pleasantly surprised as Biden fleshed out his agenda with the most [progressive](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/10/27/bidens-temperament-is-moderate-his-agenda-is-transformative/) posture ever put forward by a major-party nominee.) In the end, his persona as Middle Class Joe helped him calm skittish voters who just wanted Trump to be gone. But had Biden not been the Democratic nominee, he probably wouldn’t have gotten much airtime. Reasonable isn’t the same as juicy. There’s zero reason to think journalists will abandon the sensational for the mundane. This newsletter has spent its own fair share of time considering polarizing figures Donald Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Larry Summers, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley and Bernie Sanders since the new year began. And it’s been at the expense of vehement chasers of compromise like Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Cory Gardner and Rob Portman, who are routinely and statistically the [most bipartisan](https://www.thelugarcenter.org/ourwork-Bipartisan-Index.html?gclid=Cj0KCQiAvbiBBhD-ARIsAGM48bwh3wUupCgJRScF67s1IUx5SyUYdIuM7tHg-JJv6lF4%5FfhOiTjEisQaApNuEALw%5FwcB) members of the Senate. But it’s a good reminder to us all to look for the headlines not being written. In fact, there’s a pretty good chance your member of Congress is working on something in your own backyard. It probably isn’t sexy. But it’ll be front-and-center when he or she runs for re-election and is asked the sure-to-be-asked question, _What have you done for the district?_ That’s a question any winning politician needs to have an answer for. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the daily D.C. Brief newsletter._](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/politics?source=dc%5Farticle) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/"},"headline":"The Real Congress Is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV","datePublished":"2021-02-19T18:41:06.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T09:42:53.093Z","description":"I’ve long argued that most members of Congress, any Administration and most White Houses aren’t as extreme as the coverage of the capital suggests.","url":"https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","feature"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte2a21dfba197e778/698a1760b21a9c77845048e6/congress-capitol-washington.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte2a21dfba197e778/698a1760b21a9c77845048e6/congress-capitol-washington.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US Capitol Building Riot Aftermath","caption":"US Capitol Building Riot Aftermath","creditText":"Kent Nishimura—Los Angeles Times/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5941099/congress-media-coverage/","name":"The Real Congress Is Kinder, Gentler Than What You See on TV"}}]}] ```