<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/" -->

---
title: How America&#x27;s Safety Nets Managed to Do Just the Opposite
description: The coronavirus outbreak has exposed the shambles of how the U.S. has structured its safety nets since the Great Depression.
canonical: https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/
author: Zachary Karabell
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2020-05-21T10:28:02.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T08:46:52.491Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: A Safety Net Should Help People Feel Safe. The U.S. Managed to Do the Opposite
og:description: The virus has exposed the shambles of how the U.S. has structured its safety nets since the Great Depression
og:url: https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2400
og:image:height: 1350
og:image:alt: us-safety-nets-coronavirus
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: A Safety Net Should Help People Feel Safe. The U.S. Managed to Do the Opposite
twitter:description: The virus has exposed the shambles of how the U.S. has structured its safety nets since the Great Depression
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# A Safety Net Should Help People Feel Safe. The U.S. Managed to Do the Opposite

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="fd43dd27-8e71-48cd-974c-89a94d1cb90f" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=fd43dd27-8e71-48cd-974c-89a94d1cb90f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=fd43dd27-8e71-48cd-974c-89a94d1cb90f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=fd43dd27-8e71-48cd-974c-89a94d1cb90f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Zachary Karabell](https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/)


## Zachary Karabell


May 21, 2020 10:28 AM UTC

![A boarded-up storefront in Las Vegas, in May](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

A boarded-up storefront in Las Vegas, in May, where the jobless rate is estimated at 25%

A boarded-up storefront in Las Vegas, in May, where the jobless rate is estimated at 25% Sean Murray

by 

[Zachary Karabell](https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/)


## Zachary Karabell


May 21, 2020 10:28 AM UTC

An additional 2.98 million people filed for unemployment in the beginning of May, bringing the total lost jobs to at least 36 million by official tallies, and likely significantly more once discouraged and gig workers are factored in. Until this March, the most unemployment claims ever filed in one week was fewer than 700,000.

The primary reason for this massive surge in unemployment is of course the pandemic and the economic shutdowns to contain it. But government policy is also to blame.

The virus has exposed the shambles of how the U.S. has structured its safety nets since the Great Depression. It is a system that barely works in stable times but which in a crisis creates incentives for companies to fire people even if they intend to rehire them several months later. We have managed, in a few short weeks, to design the worst of all possible worlds: a massive aid package (the $2 trillion CARES Act) that incentivizes unemployment (despite the loans that came too late to keep some workers on payroll), pays people more than they would if they stayed employed (thanks to extra money for un-employment benefits) and makes everyone from large companies to gig workers more insecure about the future. The goal of a safety net is to help people feel … safe. Ours doesn’t.

People are deeply apprehensive. Part of that is unequivocal fear of the virus. No amount of government spending could alleviate that quickly. Economic anxiety is another matter. The contrast with the E.U. and Asia is striking. In many of those nations, governments have guaranteed the majority of worker payrolls and salaries. As a result, most companies have had no need or incentive to fire workers en masse, at least not immediately, and they’ll be able to restart operations faster.


Compare the situation in the U.S. Say you had a restaurant business with several outlets and a hundred employees in March that was modestly profitable prepandemic. Faced with months of no revenue, you could pay your workers and rent perhaps for a month before cash ran out. The CARES Act wasn’t passed until the end of March, about a week after the start of the shutdowns, but those funds didn’t start flowing till a few weeks later. But you knew that regular unemployment benefits would come quickly and would at least provide your workers with basic income. So you furlough them, allowing them to maintain health insurance, or you fire them outright. And then, when that extra $600 kicks in, and you know those payments will last until at least the end of July, it makes no sense to rehire them right now.

Then take a megacompany like Disney, which furloughed tens of thousands of employees. The Federal Reserve lending program for companies doesn’t help you because you are too big, and you’ve closed theme parks with no reopening date. So you do the same as that small business. And for medium-size companies, the Fed’s lending program doesn’t have a launch date yet, so given the urgent need to conserve cash, you too furlough or fire. And that’s in large part why we have 36 million filing for unemployment.


While some of the unemployed will do as well with the government benefits as they would have with a job, we know that getting fired can be traumatic and being unemployed is a recipe for insecurity and caution. Added to that is the uncertainty about costs of health care. The instinct is to save and conserve and cut back to essentials, which is individually rational but collectively disastrous for the economy.

We can’t undo what’s been done. But we can improve in the future. With warnings of a second wave in the fall, planning for a next round of shutdowns is essential, as is restructuring government aid programs going forward. Some hiring will return in the coming months, and to ensure that those jobs don’t once again get eliminated precipitously, government at both the federal and state levels needs to be ready to open the spigot quickly and directly so that companies have neither the incentive nor the need to fire employees. Having a streamlined process of turning on emergency relief the moment it is needed, with clear and simple rules that all businesses and workers understand in advance, is essential–and possible if there is the political will to do things differently.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/"},"headline":"A Safety Net Should Help People Feel Safe. The U.S. Managed to Do the Opposite","datePublished":"2020-05-21T10:28:02.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T08:46:52.491Z","description":"The coronavirus outbreak has exposed the shambles of how the U.S. has structured its safety nets since the Great Depression.","url":"https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/","keywords":["COVID-19","Magazine","feature"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Zachary Karabell","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb22a12daf7eba50f/698a0e524ee2626306317839/us-safety-nets-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"us-safety-nets-coronavirus","caption":"A boarded-up storefront in Las Vegas, in May","creditText":"Sean Murray","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5840189/us-safety-nets-coronavirus/","name":"A Safety Net Should Help People Feel Safe. The U.S. Managed to Do the Opposite"}}]}]
```

