--- title: Kevin Rudd: We Must Set Aside Nationalism to Learn the Truth About COVID-19 description: Any investigation into the coronavirus must answer three deeply uncomfortable questions, or it will simply degenerate into a crudely nationalist exercise, writes former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. canonical: https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/ author: Kevin Rudd article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-05-06T06:57:43.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:52:09.160Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Kevin Rudd: We Must Set Aside Crude Nationalism to Learn the Truth About COVID-19 og:description: "The Australian government’s proposal for an 'independent global investigation' into the origins of COVID-19 looks reasonable in principle, despite serious questions about Canberra’s strategy to bring it about. og:url: https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt432f76c7a12ca302/698a0db422fb85c1e9e2af45/kevin-rudd-coronavirus-investigation.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Kevin Rudd In Conversation With Stan Grant og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Kevin Rudd: We Must Set Aside Crude Nationalism to Learn the Truth About COVID-19 twitter:description: "The Australian government’s proposal for an 'independent global investigation' into the origins of COVID-19 looks reasonable in principle, despite serious questions about Canberra’s strategy to bring it about. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt432f76c7a12ca302/698a0db422fb85c1e9e2af45/kevin-rudd-coronavirus-investigation.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # We Must Set Aside Crude Nationalism If We Want to Learn the Truth About COVID-19's Origins – and Stop the Next Pandemic > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7c402497-179d-4cba-acd5-0647ed8ae337&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7c402497-179d-4cba-acd5-0647ed8ae337&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=7c402497-179d-4cba-acd5-0647ed8ae337&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Australia's Scott Morrison Stands Firm On Call For Inquiry Into COVID-19 [Watch (HLS stream): Australia's Scott Morrison Stands Firm On Call For Inquiry Into COVID-19](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/os4FKvtK.m3u8) (1:38)  _Published 2020-05-01. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Friday stood firm on his call for an inquiry into the new coronavirus and denied any motivation other than to prevent such a pandemic from happening again._  by [Kevin Rudd](https://time.com/author/kevin-rudd/)  ## Kevin Rudd May 6, 2020 6:57 AM UTC  Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, pictured Oct. 27, 2017 in Canberra, Australia. Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, pictured Oct. 27, 2017 in Canberra, Australia. Michael Masters–Getty Images  by [Kevin Rudd](https://time.com/author/kevin-rudd/)  ## Kevin Rudd May 6, 2020 6:57 AM UTC As we come to grips with the sheer magnitude of [COVID-19’s destructive impact](https://time.com/5815367/coronavirus-deaths-comparison/), there is a legitimate and ultimately irresistible demand for the world to establish the facts as to how this disaster came about. This involves three sets of deeply uncomfortable questions. First, did China [fulfill its international legal obligations](https://time.com/5813628/china-coronavirus-statistics-wuhan/) under the International Health Regulations to provide immediate, complete and transparent advice to the [World Health Organization (WHO)](https://time.com/5827383/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization/), and did it take all necessary national measures to contain the virus’ spread? Second, [did the WHO](https://time.com/5822078/china-wins-trumps-who-funding-cut/) provide all member states with the earliest and most complete advice possible as to the nature and scale of the unfolding threat? And finally, [did member states themselves](https://time.com/5829383/asia-reopening-coronavirus/) take early and effective action to contain the virus within their own national jurisdictions? If our objective is to get to the truth so that we are properly [equipped for future pandemics](https://time.com/5820607/nathan-wolfe-coronavirus-future-pandemic/) (including any second-wave effects from the current virus, or a mutation of it), any effective investigation must deal with all three questions. Otherwise, it will simply degenerate into a crudely nationalist or geopolitical exercise, while the long-suffering peoples of the world are once again left defenseless. The Australian government’s proposal on April 19 for an “independent global investigation” into the origins of COVID-19 looks reasonable in principle, despite serious questions about Canberra’s strategy to bring it about. China responded with maximum aggression, resorting to its now-infamous “wolf warrior” diplomacy. The Chinese ambassador threatened direct economic retaliation against Australian exports of agriculture, education and tourism services. It’s a not-insignificant threat; China is by far Australia’s largest trading partner, taking [38% of total Australian exports](https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/australia-s-export-share-to-china-hits-record-high-38pc-20190930-p52w9y). The Australian call occurs within the wider context of the growing blame game between Washington and Beijing over the origins of the virus. First, there was China’s unsubstantiated and unbelievable claim that the virus originated with the U.S. military. This was followed by U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo [peddling their favored theory](https://time.com/5830990/happens-next-us-china-rivalry/) that the virus escaped from a Wuhan laboratory. They have been backed by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation through Fox News in America and its far-right counterparts in the Australian print and television media. However, the “Chinese laboratory” claim has now been publicly disputed by not only the [U.S. national intelligence community](https://time.com/5830420/trump-china-rivalry-coronavirus-intelligence/) but also by[ America’s Five Eyes intelligence partners](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/04/five-eyes-network-contradicts-theory-covid-19-leaked-from-lab) including Australia. All this points to the need to get to the bottom of what actually occurred. Australia is not alone in calling for an investigation. The Swedish government has indicated it will raise a similar request with the European Commission in Brussels. In Berlin, the ever-cautious Angela Merkel has effectively backed her International Development Minister’s call for an inquiry. And now the new president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has also expressed support. The problem with the Australian proposal is that it seems to have been cobbled together on the run after Prime Minister Scott Morrison blurted out that what was needed was the WHO equivalent of U.N. “weapons inspectors” to deal with disease outbreaks in the future. This was curious given Morrison’s stated hostility to international organizations having powers at the expense of national sovereignty. The government has since weighed in and elevated Morrison’s thought bubble—lifted straight from the political rhetoric of the right-wing American commentariat—into something designed to look like a serious public policy proposal. Unfortunately, this all seems to have been put together in a rush, with no details on how such an inquiry could be executed, let alone the diplomacy needed to build a formal coalition to sponsor such an initiative. Then there’s the critical question of how it might actually be possible to get Beijing to cooperate—which will be essential for a substantive outcome, as opposed to simple political positioning. So how might such an inquiry be executed? Of course, the WHO itself has powers of investigation, but leaving aside the attacks on its impartiality in the earliest stages of the crisis, there is also the real problem of “Caesar judging Caesar.” Various international legal actions have already been launched against China, but they are likely to fall foul of China’s claim to “sovereign immunity.” The U.N. Security Council is another avenue. That would draw a veto from Beijing, and probably Russia, which could well argue that the 2009 H1N1 pandemic that resulted in 240,000 deaths did not provoke demands for an independent international inquiry into Mexico, the country of origin. So why now? That leaves the U.N. General Assembly, perhaps adopting a resolution, with terms of reference along the three-part lines suggested above, requesting the U.N. Secretary-General to convene a high-level panel of inquiry. This might even be done with Chinese co-sponsorship. Alternatively, the Secretary-General could commission such an inquiry at his own initiative. It could be composed of both Chinese and other members (although all should be scientists). These could be also be appointed by the Secretary-General who should also chair it. Sooner or later the entire international community will need to come clean on all these questions. And once we have well and truly flattened the global curve in the current pandemic, the U.N. should step into the breach. After all, that’s why we invented it in the first place. The alternative is stasis, crisis or worse. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/"},"headline":"We Must Set Aside Crude Nationalism If We Want to Learn the Truth About COVID-19's Origins – and Stop the Next Pandemic","datePublished":"2020-05-06T06:57:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:52:09.160Z","description":"Any investigation into the origins of the coronavirus must ask deeply uncomfortable questions not just of China, but of the WHO and the global response, or it will degenerate into a crudely nationalist exercise, writes former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd","url":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/","keywords":["COVID-19","feature","overnight"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt432f76c7a12ca302/698a0db422fb85c1e9e2af45/kevin-rudd-coronavirus-investigation.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kevin Rudd","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/kevin-rudd/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt432f76c7a12ca302/698a0db422fb85c1e9e2af45/kevin-rudd-coronavirus-investigation.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Kevin Rudd In Conversation With Stan Grant","caption":"Kevin Rudd In Conversation With Stan Grant","creditText":"Michael Masters–Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/","name":"We Must Set Aside Crude Nationalism If We Want to Learn the Truth About COVID-19's Origins – and Stop the Next Pandemic"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Australia's Scott Morrison Stands Firm On Call For Inquiry Into COVID-19","description":"Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Friday stood firm on his call for an inquiry into the new coronavirus and denied any motivation other than to prevent such a pandemic from happening again.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/os4FKvtK/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2020-05-01T10:07:43.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/os4FKvtK.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/","duration":"PT1M38S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5832600/kevin-rudd-china-coronavirus-investigation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```