--- title: Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation description: The formula that has governed Hong Kong since 1997 has mostly worked, says former legislator Christine Loh, but deep dialogue is needed. canonical: https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/ author: Christine Loh article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-07-05T11:11:17.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:45:04.510Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation og:description: Both political leaders and young activists need to listen to each other og:url: https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e01627127ec703a/6989ff9686f68e7ce06ed2d3/gettyimages-1153325889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5000 og:image:height: 2813 og:image:alt: Demonstrators holding anti government placards and chanting og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation twitter:description: Both political leaders and young activists need to listen to each other twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e01627127ec703a/6989ff9686f68e7ce06ed2d3/gettyimages-1153325889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation In Order to Move Forward > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=af80b535-a9ad-4718-95a4-88eafb52c19b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=af80b535-a9ad-4718-95a4-88eafb52c19b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=af80b535-a9ad-4718-95a4-88eafb52c19b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Christine Loh](https://time.com/author/christine-loh/) ## Christine Loh Jul 5, 2019 11:11 AM UTC  Demonstrators in Hong Kong hold anti-government placards and chant slogans during a march on July 1, 2019. Demonstrators in Hong Kong hold anti-government placards and chant slogans during a march on July 1, 2019. Miguel Candela/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images by [Christine Loh](https://time.com/author/christine-loh/) ## Christine Loh Jul 5, 2019 11:11 AM UTC Hong Kong has a longstanding, admirable protest culture that is peaceful, but [recent acts of vandalism](https://time.com/longform/hong-kong-july-1-handover-china-protests-democracy/) have jolted the city. Having let off steam through orderly means on the one hand, and through violent means on the other hand, Hong Kong needs to ready itself for reflection on its predicament. The people of this city can peacefully protest in enormous numbers—ranging from tens and hundreds of thousands to two million—because they are pragmatic and gentle souls. The local protest culture represents global best practice in how to vent frustration in an impressively large but peaceful fashion. The [big marches](https://time.com/5607046/hong-kong-protest-extradition/) usually start after lunch on full stomachs. Despite fierce heat and humidity, people remain unfailingly patient—waiting for hours before moving along the well-trodden path from Victoria Park to government headquarters, because of the sheer size of the crowd. Shops stay open yet nothing is trashed along the way. Organizers need a permit from the police to demonstrate. The cooperative role of the police has been crucial to the development of Hong Kong’s protest culture. Permits are seldom denied because a part of the city’s shared political core values is the freedom of expression. Ordinary folk feel safe to join in; and the police ensure public safety through well-practiced crowd control and traffic diversions. Hong Kong people may be frustrated but there has never been much appetite for instability and disruptions. They have too much to lose by upsetting the socio-economic applecart. The vandalism of the Legislative Council building on July 1 was an exception and marred Hong Kong’s otherwise peaceful protest record. While some half a million marched along the usual route without incident, a small group besieged the complex for hours before finally breaking through and then wrecking the meeting chamber with media cameras beaming the destruction for the world to see. The trigger to both strands of protest was the Hong Kong government’s controversial [extradition bill](https://time.com/5607099/why-hong-kong-protests-extradition/) that would allow case-by-case renditions of alleged fugitive offenders from Hong Kong to other jurisdictions, including the Chinese mainland. The now suspended bill was a lightning rod that electrified Hong Kong people’s many anxieties—from relations with mainland China to local socio-economic problems ranging from land and housing supply to advancement for youth—and the July 1 march followed a row of big demonstrations in close succession. Hong Kong got a new sovereign power in 1997, when it ceased to be a British colony and became a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. But the real transition is still on-going. China has changed immensely since 1984, when the Sino-British Joint Declaration was signed and Britain agreed to hand Hong Kong back to China 13 years later. This tiny city’s GDP was more than 30 percent of China’s in the early 1980s. By 1997, it’s GDP was still around 20 percent of the size of the nation’s economy. Today, it is less than 3 percent; and the size of neighboring Shenzhen’s economy surpassed Hong Kong’s in 2018. Hong Kong is fortunate to have such a big, growing hinterland but the rise of China makes people feel relatively less significant than before; and they worry they might have lost their mojo when there is plenty of hungry talent just next door. This is, in fact, not just Hong Kong’s concern. China’s rise has spooked other places too. In their hearts, Hong Kong people know they have to reconcile with being a part of the People’s Republic but dealing with it has not been easy. There are major changes associated with Hong Kong’s post-1997 right to operate a separate legal and political system within China—a formula known as “One Country, Two Systems.” China’s experiment of allowing a free-wheeling capitalist enclave to exist inside its much bigger socialist system was based on a belief that, over time, as its own economic reforms take root, differences would narrow. It could be argued there are many aspects of this experiment that are positive. Nevertheless, the protests over the extradition bill showed that deep fault lines still exist between the two systems, [especially among youth](https://time.com/5615570/hong-kong-youth-protesters-democracy/). They have become highly politicized, and along with them, their parents too. It begun over how schools should teach civic education in 2012, and continued in 2014 through the [Umbrella Movement](https://time.com/3632739/hong-kong-umbrella-revolution-photos/)—a 79-day street occupation to call for electoral reform. The extradition bill re-opened unsettled matters. Hong Kong people want a more democratic system but they can also see it is not a full solution to solving problems. They are disappointed with the establishment and opposition political elites, who have not been able to provide inspiring leadership. The territory needs to have a deep dialogue of reconciliation in order to move forward within One Country. Beijing needs to allow it because it needs to hear the concerns of Hong Kong people, including the desire for greater democracy and respect for personal freedoms. The political elites need to listen, too, if they want the stability that undergirds Hong Kong’s prosperity. Grandstanding and finger-pointing at each other won’t solve problems. To accept that they are part of the problem might just make them better leaders. The mark of true leadership is whether it can transform a crisis into an opportunity that serves a wider cause. Young activists are going to be tested. Can they, too, listen to others and reflect the interests of the entire community? The precondition to deliberation and reconciliation is to listen first before firing off insults and repeatedly asserting positions. The mark of a civilized society is to be able to listen to people who disagree with you and not allow the disagreements to destroy goodwill. Hong Kong has much going for it. One Country, Two Systems has worked, albeit with some rough edges. The people of Hong Kong have always been reasonable and pragmatic. Their best practice in public protest shows that if anyone has the capacity to overcome political challenges, they do. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/"},"headline":"Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation In Order to Move Forward","datePublished":"2019-07-05T11:11:17.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:45:04.510Z","description":"Both political leaders and young activists need to listen","url":"https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/","keywords":["Hong Kong"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e01627127ec703a/6989ff9686f68e7ce06ed2d3/gettyimages-1153325889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Christine Loh","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/christine-loh/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e01627127ec703a/6989ff9686f68e7ce06ed2d3/gettyimages-1153325889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Demonstrators holding anti government placards and chanting","caption":"Demonstrators holding anti government placards and chanting","creditText":"Miguel Candela/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/hong-kong/","name":"Hong Kong"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5620924/hong-kong-china-protests-dialogue-reconciliation/","name":"Hong Kong Needs a Deep Dialogue of Reconciliation In Order to Move Forward"}}]}] ```