Researchers used an experimental gene therapy to develop a possible treatment for a rare and deadly immune disorder known as “bubble boy” disease, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced Wednesday.
Because of a gene mutation, babies who are born with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) do not develop immune cells properly, leaving them highly susceptible to infections. The condition, which strikes up to one in 50,000 newborns, primarily affects boys and requires extreme measures to prevent infection. In one famous case, a boy with SCID, David Vetter, lived in a sterile plastic “bubble” until his death at age 12 — hence the disease’s nickname.
Until now, the best treatment for these difficult cases relied on using bone marrow transplants from tissue-matched siblings to restore immunity. But since many patients do not have a sibling who’s a match, doctors often resort to other donors. Such donations can improve patients’ health, but they often can’t produce full immunity, the NIH says — which is why gene therapy has seemed so promising. Still, previous gene therapy techniques either did not fully restore immune function or resulted in side effects as serious as leukemia.
Now, a gene therapy advance described in a small New England Journal of Medicine study seems to have safely produced a robust immune response in eight young patients, offering families and doctors new hope.
Eight infants with X-SCID took part in the trial. All were between 2-14 months, none had a sibling donor match and many had preexisting infections. Four were treated at St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital, and four were treated at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital. (UCSF Benioff is supported by Marc and Lynne Benioff, the co-chairs and owners of TIME.)
Doctors took samples of each baby’s bone marrow to collect blood-forming stem cells, then each baby received doses of busulfan, a chemotherapy agent, in order to wipe out their existing immune systems. That prepared them to rebuild healthy ones from corrected copies of the mutated gene that caused X-SCID, which the researchers inserted into the babies’ blood-forming stem cells using an inactive virus. These were then infused into the newborns in hopes that it would spur normal immune function.
Three to four months later, seven of the babies were producing multiple types of normal immune cells, including some that had never been produced before in X-SCID patients treated with gene therapy. (The eighth baby produced a healthy immune response after another dose of gene therapy, researchers report.) Many of the babies’ preexisting infections also cleared.
The therapy worked well enough that four of the babies were eventually able to stop getting antibody infusions, which doctors often use to boost immunity. Three also show normal responses to childhood vaccines, another sign that their immune systems are healthier. The babies were growing and developing normally during up to two years of follow-up, which ended in September.
The results are preliminary, and more research is needed — as is long-term follow-up of the existing patients. But researchers are hopeful that the technique could offer a brighter future to families who receive this traumatic diagnosis.
“These exciting new results suggest that gene therapy may be an effective treatment option for infants with this extremely serious condition, particularly those who lack an optimal donor for stem cell transplant,” says Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in a statement. “This advance offers them the hope of developing a wholly functional immune system and the chance to live a full, healthy life.”
- The Fight to Save the Salmon
- Inside the World of Black Bitcoin, Where Crypto Is About Making More Than Just Money
- The 'Great Resignation' Is Finally Getting Companies to Take Burnout Seriously. Is It Enough?
- Suddenly, Everyone on TV Is Very Rich or Very Poor. What Happened?
- Colin Powell Reflects on His Mistakes in Unpublished TIME Interview
- Business Travel's Demise Could Have Far-Reaching Consequences
- If the U.S. Spends Big on Climate, the Rest of the World Might Follow